19.01.2013 Views

AREA A/B ENGINEERING REPORT - Waste Management

AREA A/B ENGINEERING REPORT - Waste Management

AREA A/B ENGINEERING REPORT - Waste Management

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Geosyntec Consultants<br />

Although leachate generation rates are anticipated to be very low after landfill closure, LCSs are<br />

conservatively designed to rapidly convey large leachate flows to sumps (Rowe, 1998)<br />

throughout the operating and PCC periods. Flow rates in LCSs are typically high enough to<br />

function even after accumulation of leachate particles in the drainage layer and pipes. Cleanout<br />

pipes that connect to the main LCS pipes in the landfill are incorporated into the design to flush<br />

debris from the main LCS pipes, if necessary. In addition, the high design flow rates reduce the<br />

potential for the LCS to have sustained periods of saturation, decreasing the potential for<br />

development of biological and chemical clog material in the LCS.<br />

The potential for LCS clogging in MSW landfills has been considered by a large number of<br />

researchers (e.g., Bass, et al., 1983; Koerner & Koerner, 1989, 1990, 1991, and 1995; Rohde &<br />

Gribb, 1990; Brune, et al., 1991; Craven, et al., 1999; Fleming, et al., 1999; Fleming & Rowe,<br />

2004; Van Gulck & Rowe, 2004; Rowe and Van Gulck, 2004; Cooke et al., 2005; Rowe, 2005).<br />

These studies indicate that clog material forms “by biologically induced processes that involve the<br />

removal of some of the organic leachate constituents (as implied by the reduction in COD) and<br />

precipitation of some inorganic leachate constituents (as implied by the reduction in calcium<br />

concentration)” followed by “an accumulation of inorganic particles originally suspended in the<br />

leachate” (Rowe, 2005). They also suggest that the potential for clogging depends on the amount<br />

and composition of leachate and on the details of the design of the LCS.<br />

Based on the above studies, for clogging to occur, the following two conditions generally need to<br />

exist: (i) inadequate design of a sand or geotextile filter; and/or (ii) unexpectedly high rate of<br />

relatively high strength leachate produced in the landfill that keeps the LCS near saturation. The<br />

first condition is mitigated by properly designing the filter to resist physical clogging. A LCS<br />

generally includes a geotextile filter that is wrapped around LCS pipe bedding gravel; it may<br />

also include a sand or geotextile filter between the drainage layer and the overlying soil or<br />

waste layer. Methods for design of filters are well established, and there is extensive information<br />

in the technical literature on sand and geotextile filter design (e.g., Giroud, 1982 and 1996;<br />

Lafleur, et al., 1989; Luettich, et al., 1992; Koerner, 1998). The second condition for clogging of<br />

LCSs in landfills is primarily related to the rate of leachate generation. The lower the leachate<br />

generation rate, the lower the potential for clogging (other factors being equal). Given the<br />

significant decrease in leachate generation rates after landfill closure, the potential for biological<br />

clogging of the LCS decreases after the landfill is closed with a final cover system. The second<br />

condition can therefore be avoided through good landfill operation (to limit unnecessary leachate<br />

generation) and prompt application (as required under Subtitle D) of a suitably designed cover<br />

system after site closure, supplemented with knowledge of leachate compositional trends (as<br />

described in detail in Appendix A).<br />

MD10186.doc 129 29 March 2009

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!