AREA A/B ENGINEERING REPORT - Waste Management
AREA A/B ENGINEERING REPORT - Waste Management
AREA A/B ENGINEERING REPORT - Waste Management
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Geosyntec Consultants<br />
Although leachate generation rates are anticipated to be very low after landfill closure, LCSs are<br />
conservatively designed to rapidly convey large leachate flows to sumps (Rowe, 1998)<br />
throughout the operating and PCC periods. Flow rates in LCSs are typically high enough to<br />
function even after accumulation of leachate particles in the drainage layer and pipes. Cleanout<br />
pipes that connect to the main LCS pipes in the landfill are incorporated into the design to flush<br />
debris from the main LCS pipes, if necessary. In addition, the high design flow rates reduce the<br />
potential for the LCS to have sustained periods of saturation, decreasing the potential for<br />
development of biological and chemical clog material in the LCS.<br />
The potential for LCS clogging in MSW landfills has been considered by a large number of<br />
researchers (e.g., Bass, et al., 1983; Koerner & Koerner, 1989, 1990, 1991, and 1995; Rohde &<br />
Gribb, 1990; Brune, et al., 1991; Craven, et al., 1999; Fleming, et al., 1999; Fleming & Rowe,<br />
2004; Van Gulck & Rowe, 2004; Rowe and Van Gulck, 2004; Cooke et al., 2005; Rowe, 2005).<br />
These studies indicate that clog material forms “by biologically induced processes that involve the<br />
removal of some of the organic leachate constituents (as implied by the reduction in COD) and<br />
precipitation of some inorganic leachate constituents (as implied by the reduction in calcium<br />
concentration)” followed by “an accumulation of inorganic particles originally suspended in the<br />
leachate” (Rowe, 2005). They also suggest that the potential for clogging depends on the amount<br />
and composition of leachate and on the details of the design of the LCS.<br />
Based on the above studies, for clogging to occur, the following two conditions generally need to<br />
exist: (i) inadequate design of a sand or geotextile filter; and/or (ii) unexpectedly high rate of<br />
relatively high strength leachate produced in the landfill that keeps the LCS near saturation. The<br />
first condition is mitigated by properly designing the filter to resist physical clogging. A LCS<br />
generally includes a geotextile filter that is wrapped around LCS pipe bedding gravel; it may<br />
also include a sand or geotextile filter between the drainage layer and the overlying soil or<br />
waste layer. Methods for design of filters are well established, and there is extensive information<br />
in the technical literature on sand and geotextile filter design (e.g., Giroud, 1982 and 1996;<br />
Lafleur, et al., 1989; Luettich, et al., 1992; Koerner, 1998). The second condition for clogging of<br />
LCSs in landfills is primarily related to the rate of leachate generation. The lower the leachate<br />
generation rate, the lower the potential for clogging (other factors being equal). Given the<br />
significant decrease in leachate generation rates after landfill closure, the potential for biological<br />
clogging of the LCS decreases after the landfill is closed with a final cover system. The second<br />
condition can therefore be avoided through good landfill operation (to limit unnecessary leachate<br />
generation) and prompt application (as required under Subtitle D) of a suitably designed cover<br />
system after site closure, supplemented with knowledge of leachate compositional trends (as<br />
described in detail in Appendix A).<br />
MD10186.doc 129 29 March 2009