19.01.2013 Views

AREA A/B ENGINEERING REPORT - Waste Management

AREA A/B ENGINEERING REPORT - Waste Management

AREA A/B ENGINEERING REPORT - Waste Management

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

A4. LONG-TERM TRENDS IN LANDFILL GAS GENERATION AND COMPOSITION<br />

A4.1 Technical Synopsis<br />

Geosyntec Consultants<br />

• The primary factors affecting LFG generation are similar to those affecting waste<br />

degradation;<br />

• Methane generation from MSW landfills decreases after closure, typically peaking<br />

about one year after cessation of waste placement before tapering off in exponential<br />

form; and<br />

• Concentrations of non-methane organic compounds (NMOC) in LFG at closed landfills<br />

decrease at rates that are similar to, or in advance of, the rate of decline in methane<br />

concentration.<br />

Seminal Supporting References: Farquhar & Rovers (1973); Pohland & Harper, 1986;<br />

Barlaz, et al, 1990 and 2004; SWANA, 2002; Sullivan & Michels, 2000; Soltani-Ahmadi,<br />

2002; Sullivan, et al, 2004.<br />

A4.2 Summary of Supporting Body of Knowledge<br />

The primary factors affecting LFG generation are similar to those affecting waste degradation as<br />

described in Section A1.1 (i.e., mass of waste, percentage of total organic material in the waste<br />

when placed, as-placed moisture content of waste, and temperature). It is well documented (e.g.,<br />

Pohland & Harper, 1986; Barlaz, et al, 1990) that methane generation from MSW landfills<br />

decreases with waste age (i.e., after closure). Under normal conditions, LFG generation rates<br />

typically reach a peak about one year after cessation of waste placement before tapering off in<br />

exponential form. Although the total quantity of LFG that can be generated is fixed by the mass<br />

and nature of the MSW in place, it is well known that the rate of LFG production can be<br />

enhanced by liquid injection into a landfill (van Zanten & Sheepers, 1995; Sullivan & Stege,<br />

2000; SWANA, 2002). In addition, a number of researchers (e.g., Hsin-Mei & Kuo, 2000; Green,<br />

et al, 2000; Sullivan, et al, 2004) have demonstrated declining concentration trends for nonmethane<br />

organic compounds (NMOC) in LFG at closed landfills under a wide range of conditions,<br />

operational practices, and timeframes, and at rates that are similar to, or in advance of, the rate<br />

of decline in methane concentration. This body of knowledge forms an important technical basis<br />

for using the trends in LFG quantity and quality as an indicator that evaluation of LFG generation<br />

(and associated pressure buildup) as the principal cause of uncontrolled surface emissions or<br />

subsurface LFG migration may be based upon a first-order decay curve for LFG production after<br />

closure.<br />

The data used by USEPA to develop default values for NMOC production were collected mainly<br />

during the 1980s (i.e., prior to RCRA’s hazardous waste exclusion rules) and have not been<br />

MD10186.doc 115 29 March 2009

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!