19.01.2013 Views

AREA A/B ENGINEERING REPORT - Waste Management

AREA A/B ENGINEERING REPORT - Waste Management

AREA A/B ENGINEERING REPORT - Waste Management

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

3.6.1 Landfill Gas Collection Efficiency<br />

Geosyntec Consultants<br />

The majority of potential GHG emissions from a landfill are controlled by the LFG management<br />

system, as previously discussed in Section 3.5. The collection efficiency of a gas control system is<br />

the percentage of the total LFG generated in the landfill that is recovered by the<br />

system. Gas collection systems at modern landfills with well-engineered final<br />

cover systems have been demonstrated to have very high efficiencies and thus<br />

are proficient at reducing GHG emissions 18 . However, gas collection efficiencies<br />

are dependent on the type of cover being used during the operation of the<br />

landfill. State-of-the-practice literature regarding gas collection efficiencies under different<br />

cover conditions are summarized in the recently completed study published by SWICS (2009),<br />

which also provides collection efficiency values obtained from a comprehensive field-testing<br />

program.<br />

Effects of Cover Conditions: The conclusions of the field tests performed for SWICS (2009)<br />

relating gas collection efficiencies to cover conditions are summarized below (it should be noted<br />

that test data on daily soil covers was limited, as stated by the experts involved with the creation<br />

and review of that document):<br />

• Daily Cover: Collection efficiencies are in the range of 50-70 percent, with a mid-range<br />

default of 60 percent, for portions of a landfill that are under daily soil cover with an<br />

active LFG collection system installed;<br />

• Intermediate Cover: Collection efficiencies are in the range of 54-95 percent, with a<br />

mid-range default of 75 percent, for a landfill or portions of a landfill that contain an<br />

intermediate soil cover with an active LFG collection system installed; and<br />

• Final Cover: Collection efficiencies are in the range of 90-99 percent, with a mid-range<br />

default of 95 percent, for landfills that contain a final soil and/or geomembrane cover<br />

system with an active LFG collection system.<br />

Effects of Gas System Design and Operation: The effectiveness of a gas collection system is<br />

dependent upon its intended design and mode of operation. If a gas collection system is<br />

designed for compliance with the USEPA’s New Source Performance Standards (NSPS), or to meet<br />

similar air quality requirements, it will likely be capable of greater collection efficiencies than a<br />

system whose design basis was to control subsurface gas migration. Similarly, a landfill with a<br />

gas collection system installed voluntarily as part of an energy utilization project may not be<br />

capable of collection efficiencies as high as NSPS-compliant systems simply because it is often<br />

difficult to maximize gas quality (needed for optimal energy production) at maximized levels of<br />

gas collection across the entire wellfield.<br />

In summary, the actual collection efficiency of the LFG collection system is dependent on the<br />

operational phase of landfill development and the type of cover in place. A recent white paper<br />

18 Appendix B provides an in-depth discussion and several references regarding the ability of landfills to control<br />

methane emissions through effective gas collection.<br />

MD10186.doc 55 29 March 2009

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!