19.01.2013 Views

AREA A/B ENGINEERING REPORT - Waste Management

AREA A/B ENGINEERING REPORT - Waste Management

AREA A/B ENGINEERING REPORT - Waste Management

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Geosyntec Consultants<br />

secondary, and tertiary processes. 12 Approaches that are sufficient as primary treatment in one<br />

case may be appropriate as a tertiary stage for “polishing” of pretreated effluent prior to<br />

discharge at another site.<br />

For example, at an older closed landfill, an<br />

engineered wetland or reed bed in which<br />

leachate is physically and biologically treated<br />

may be capable of providing effective<br />

treatment of leachate to achieve surface water<br />

discharge standards. A sustainable LMS<br />

strategy at a newer active landfill might involve<br />

the use of wetlands for effluent polishing;<br />

however, in this application, pre-treatment using<br />

a more active treatment system is typically<br />

required if influent leachate constituent<br />

concentrations are well above surface water<br />

quality standards. As previously discussed,<br />

untreated leachate or treated effluent may be<br />

Constructed vertical wetlands provide a passive<br />

method by which leachate can be treated prior to<br />

discharge. The system design also offers added<br />

value as a potential wildlife habitat.<br />

recirculated back into the landfill depending on the waste degradation strategy or other<br />

potential beneficial use strategy of the landfill (e.g., gas-to-energy plant). Most treated effluent<br />

also has other beneficial uses (e.g., use for dust suppression on access roads within the landfill<br />

footprint or as flush water for toilet facilities).<br />

Because the characteristics of MSW leachate at a landfill are well understood and are<br />

predictable in terms of both their expected quantity and quality over time (see Section 1.4 and<br />

discussion in Appendix A), it is becoming standard practice to design a LMS that considers<br />

changes in long-term leachate management obligations in defining goals for sustainable landfill<br />

operation at the managed modern landfill.<br />

3.4 Landfill Cover Systems<br />

The landfill cover system is designed to promote surface water runoff, minimize erosion, prevent<br />

direct exposure to waste, and control gas emissions and odors. A secondary objective is to<br />

provide an aesthetically pleasing final appearance for the landfill. In this regard, the cover can<br />

be designed to be compatible with the local ecosystem to broaden the potential end uses of the<br />

property. The landfill cover system provides ongoing protection of human health and the<br />

environment, improves the collection efficiency of the gas management system, and serves an<br />

important function in onsite liquids management.<br />

12 A number of technical publications deal extensively with leachate treatment technologies, including USEPA (1995a),<br />

and U.K. Environment Agency (2007), as well as Robinson (1999), Robinson, et al. (2003), and Robinson & Olufsen<br />

(2004).<br />

MD10186.doc 44 29 March 2009

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!