19.01.2013 Views

AREA A/B ENGINEERING REPORT - Waste Management

AREA A/B ENGINEERING REPORT - Waste Management

AREA A/B ENGINEERING REPORT - Waste Management

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

3.5.3 Key Environmentally Protective Features of Gas Control Systems<br />

Geosyntec Consultants<br />

Both active and passive gas management systems play a major role in protecting human health<br />

and environmental media at a landfill. The major environmental benefits of installing a GMS can<br />

be broadly categorized as follows:<br />

• Control of subsurface gas migration in the vadose zone, which<br />

leads to protection of on-site or adjacent buildings and<br />

structures, protects groundwater from potential impact from<br />

water-soluble pollutants contained in LFG, and reduces<br />

vegetative stress in landfill buffer areas; and<br />

• Control of surface gas emissions and nuisance odors, protecting air quality<br />

and reducing vegetative stress on the cover system.<br />

In addition, as discussed further in Section 7.3, because of its rich methane content, LFG<br />

offers numerous opportunities to provide renewable, green energy through landfill<br />

gas-to-energy (LFGTE) strategies. Landfill methane may also be used directly to fuel<br />

boilers, furnaces, engines, and vehicles, or as a feedstock for chemical processes.<br />

3.5.4 Long-Term Performance of Gas <strong>Management</strong> Systems<br />

Because an active GMS is an operational system in which all components can<br />

be repaired or replaced as necessary, its long-term performance and<br />

operational efficiency is most closely related to its level of maintenance.<br />

Similarly, the long-term performance of a passive GMS is directly related to<br />

maintenance – passive systems will continue to perform as designed for as long as<br />

they are properly maintained. Because many passive LFG management strategies rely wholly on<br />

natural processes such as methane oxidation in soil covers, landfill designers can develop very low<br />

maintenance or even self-sustaining passive systems.<br />

As first discussed in Section 1.4.1, LFG generation from MSW landfills decreases with waste age;<br />

LFG generation rates typically reach a peak about one year after cessation of waste placement<br />

(closure) before tapering off following a well-documented exponential decay curve. Peak LFG<br />

generation and the rate at which LFG generation decreases is affected by how much water<br />

infiltrates the landfill and is available for waste biodegradation processes. Therefore, the<br />

duration for which significant LFG management will be required at a site is largely driven by two<br />

factors:<br />

• Operational conditions (most significantly, whether the landfill was operated as a “wet”<br />

landfill to enhance biodegradation rates or as a conventional “dry” landfill); and<br />

• Cover system design and maintenance.<br />

As the supply of LFG from an aging landfill decreases, a landfill operator may be able to phase<br />

MD10186.doc 53 29 March 2009

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!