Geosyntec Consultants Shimaoka T., Lee N., Matsufuji Y., Hanashima M. (1993) “Self-Purification Capacity of the Existing Solid <strong>Waste</strong> Layers in Landfills.” Proc. Sardinia 1993, 4 th Int. Landfill Symp., 11-15 October 1993, Cagliari, Italy. Solid <strong>Waste</strong> Association of North America (2002) “The solid waste manager’s guide to the bioreactor landfill.” SWANA Applied Research Foundation (revised June 2003). Solid <strong>Waste</strong> Association of North America (2004) “The Effectiveness of Municipal Solid <strong>Waste</strong> Landfills in Controlling Releases of Heavy Metals into the Environment.” SWANA Applied Research Foundation, March 2004. Soltani-Ahmadi H (2002) “A Review of the Literature Regarding Non-methane and Volatile Organic Compounds in MSW Landfill Gas,” MSW Magazine, September/October 2002. Statom R.A., Thyne G., McCray J.E. (2007) “Temporal Changes in Leachate Chemistry of a Municipal Solid <strong>Waste</strong> Landfill in Florida, USA.” DRAFT – Submitted for publication to Hydrogeology Journal. Sullivan P.S., Michels M.S. (2000) “The Time is Now for Changes to the AP-42 Section on Landfills.” Proc. SWANA’s 23th Annual Landfill Gas Symp., March 2000, La Jolla, CA. Sullivan P.S., Stege G.A. (2000) “An evaluation of air and greenhouse gas emissions and methane-recovery potential from bioreactor landfills.” MSW Magazine, September/October 2000. Sullivan P.S., Obereiner J., Clarke H.S., Fourie G. (2004) “Estimating the trend for NMOC generation and emissions after closure of MSW landfills.” Proc. SWANA’s 27th Annual Landfill Gas Symp., 22-25 March 2004, San Antonio, TX. Tchobanoglous G., Theisen H., Vigil S. (1993) “Integrated Solid <strong>Waste</strong> <strong>Management</strong>: Engineering Principles and <strong>Management</strong> Issues,” McGraw-Hill, New York, NY. United States Environmental Protection Agency (1993) “Solid <strong>Waste</strong> Disposal Facility Criteria: Technical Manual,” EPA530-R-93-017. USEPA Office of Solid <strong>Waste</strong>, Washington DC, USA, November 1993 (revised 13 April 1998). United States Environmental Protection Agency (2007) “Analysis of 40 Potential TSDs: Potential RCRA Treatment, Storage, and Disposal Facilities Proposed to the Superfund National Priority List after 1990,” USEPA Office of Solid <strong>Waste</strong>, 19 January 2007. Van Zanten B., Sheepers M.J.J. (1995) “Modeling of landfill gas potentials.” Proc. SWANA’s 18th Annual Landfill Gas Symp., March 1995, New Orleans, LA. Van Zomeren, A., van der Sloot, H.A. and Hoede, D. (2003) “Laboratory, pilot and field studies on stabilized waste produced at the VBM Site for recipe development, quality control and support of regulation.” In: Ortiz de Urbina, G. and Goumans, J.J.J.M. (Eds.) Proceedings of WASCON 2003 <strong>Waste</strong> Materials in Construction. 4-6 June, 2003, San Sebastian, Spain. Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources (2006) “Plan of Operation and Closure Plans for Landfills - Miscellaneous requirements for plans of operation.” Wisconsin Administrative Code, Chapter NR 514.07(9), December, 2006. MD10186.doc 121 29 March 2009
Geosyntec Consultants Youcai Z., Hua L., Jun W., Guowei G. (2002) “Treatment of Leachate by Aged-Refuse-Based Biofilter.” J. Environ. Eng., 128(7), 662-668. MD10186.doc 122 29 March 2009
- Page 1 and 2:
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AT THE MAN
- Page 3 and 4:
TABLE OF CONTENTS Geosyntec Consult
- Page 5 and 6:
TABLE OF CONTENTS (continued) Geosy
- Page 7 and 8:
TABLE OF CONTENTS (continued) Geosy
- Page 9 and 10:
DEFINITIONS AND LIST OF ACRONYMS AC
- Page 11 and 12:
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Geosyntec Consult
- Page 13 and 14:
Geosyntec Consultants time, the lan
- Page 15 and 16:
Long-Term Liner System Performance
- Page 17 and 18:
Geosyntec Consultants generation is
- Page 19 and 20:
Geosyntec Consultants cover systems
- Page 21 and 22:
Beyond Waste Containment - Landfill
- Page 23 and 24:
Geosyntec Consultants • Section 3
- Page 25 and 26:
Geosyntec Consultants Required by r
- Page 27 and 28:
• Landfill gas system monitoring
- Page 29 and 30:
Geosyntec Consultants An extensive
- Page 31 and 32:
1.4.2 Permanent Storage of Biogenic
- Page 33 and 34:
2. REGULATORY OVERSIGHT OF MANAGED
- Page 35 and 36:
2.2.1 Siting Considerations Geosynt
- Page 37 and 38:
Geosyntec Consultants The LCRS is i
- Page 39 and 40:
• Control moisture and percolatio
- Page 41 and 42:
3. DESIGN COMPONENT SYSTEMS OF A MA
- Page 43 and 44:
Prescriptive Final Cover System 1.
- Page 45 and 46:
3.2.2 Key Environmentally Protectiv
- Page 47 and 48:
Geosyntec Consultants selected and
- Page 49 and 50:
Geosyntec Consultants • Leachate
- Page 51 and 52:
Geosyntec Consultants secondary, an
- Page 53 and 54:
Geosyntec Consultants along with re
- Page 55 and 56:
Geosyntec Consultants cover surface
- Page 57 and 58:
3.5 Gas Management System Geosyntec
- Page 59 and 60:
Geosyntec Consultants • Passive c
- Page 61 and 62:
Geosyntec Consultants out certain p
- Page 63 and 64:
Geosyntec Consultants on the curren
- Page 65 and 66:
4. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OF A M
- Page 67 and 68:
Geosyntec Consultants permit condit
- Page 69 and 70:
Geosyntec Consultants • Standard
- Page 71 and 72:
Geosyntec Consultants Design of the
- Page 73 and 74:
Geosyntec Consultants waste constit
- Page 75 and 76:
5. ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AT MANA
- Page 77 and 78: Geosyntec Consultants safeguards fo
- Page 79 and 80: Geosyntec Consultants LFG migration
- Page 81 and 82: Geosyntec Consultants Other example
- Page 83 and 84: Geosyntec Consultants operation is
- Page 85 and 86: Geosyntec Consultants landfill syst
- Page 87 and 88: Geosyntec Consultants behind the li
- Page 89 and 90: Table 6-0: Summary of Section 6 Tab
- Page 91 and 92: Containment Attribute Siting and De
- Page 93 and 94: Waste Treatment Attribute Siting an
- Page 95 and 96: Environmental and Performance Monit
- Page 97 and 98: they help reduce the dependency on
- Page 99 and 100: Geosyntec Consultants that landfill
- Page 101 and 102: 7.4 Increased Beneficial End Use Op
- Page 103 and 104: 8. REFERENCES Geosyntec Consultants
- Page 105 and 106: Geosyntec Consultants Eid H.T., Sta
- Page 107 and 108: Geosyntec Consultants Koerner R.M.,
- Page 109 and 110: Geosyntec Consultants Sangam H.P.,
- Page 111 and 112: Geosyntec Consultants Wardwell R.E.
- Page 113 and 114: I II III IV V VI VII VIII Figure A-
- Page 115 and 116: • Long-terms trends in MSW leacha
- Page 117 and 118: Geosyntec Consultants sites of diff
- Page 119 and 120: A2.1.5 Development of a “Biofilte
- Page 121 and 122: Geosyntec Consultants impact health
- Page 123 and 124: Geosyntec Consultants updated despi
- Page 125 and 126: Geosyntec Consultants Gibbons R.D.,
- Page 127: Geosyntec Consultants Pivato A., Mo
- Page 131 and 132: • Long-term performance of leacha
- Page 133 and 134: AVERAGE LCRS FLOW RATE (lphd) 100,0
- Page 135 and 136: B3. LONG-TERM PERFORMANCE OF LEACHA
- Page 137 and 138: B4. FINAL COVER SYSTEM PERFORMANCE
- Page 139 and 140: Geosyntec Consultants compacted but
- Page 141 and 142: Geosyntec Consultants various pract
- Page 143 and 144: Geosyntec Consultants In summary, a
- Page 145 and 146: REFERENCES Geosyntec Consultants Ab
- Page 147 and 148: Geosyntec Consultants Humer M., Lec
- Page 149 and 150: Geosyntec Consultants United States
- Page 151 and 152: Geosyntec Consultants These three s
- Page 153 and 154: Geosyntec Consultants discontinue o
- Page 155 and 156: C4. LONG-TERM INTEGRITY OF LANDFILL
- Page 157 and 158: Geosyntec Consultants well known, t
- Page 159: Geosyntec Consultants Zekkos D., Br