19.01.2013 Views

AREA A/B ENGINEERING REPORT - Waste Management

AREA A/B ENGINEERING REPORT - Waste Management

AREA A/B ENGINEERING REPORT - Waste Management

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Geosyntec Consultants<br />

begins to be observed. Oxidation reactions then proceed slowly throughout the service life of<br />

HDPE geomembranes and, eventually, the geomembrane will likely become brittle to the extent<br />

that it is considered to have reached the end of its service life (Rowe & Sangam, 2002). In their<br />

research report for the USEPA, Koerner & Hsuan (2002) select this point as the 50 percent<br />

reduction in a specific design property, such as tensile stress at break, although they note that<br />

even with this reduction in design property the geomembrane can still function, albeit at a<br />

decreased performance level. With this conservative endpoint defined, the service life of HDPE<br />

geomembranes was estimated to be on the order of a thousand years: approximately 200 years<br />

for antioxidant depletion, over 20 years for induction of geomembrane oxidation, and 750 years<br />

for 50 percent degradation of strength properties (Bonaparte, et al., 2002a).<br />

Although a geomembrane may lose strength over time, Rowe & Sangam (2002) highlighted that<br />

the real service life of a geomembrane depends on the hydraulic and diffusive properties of the<br />

geomembrane. Thus, a geomembrane may lose strength while still performing satisfactorily as a<br />

barrier. Accordingly, the true hydraulic and diffusive service life of a geomembrane may<br />

significantly exceed the service life determined based on the degradation of the physical and<br />

mechanical properties, especially if the tensile stresses are minimal. Furthermore, burial or<br />

submersion of a geomembrane can lessen the rate of antioxidant depletion and geomembrane<br />

oxidation by decreasing the availability of oxygen. In the case of a geomembrane liner for a<br />

MSW landfill, biodegradation of waste will probably consume most of the available oxygen<br />

above the liner well before the end of PCC period (perhaps even as soon as shortly after the<br />

start of PCC).<br />

The low-permeability soil component of a Subtitle D composite liner typically consists of a<br />

compacted clay liner (CCL), a geosynthetic clay liner (GCL), or a GCL overlying a CCL.<br />

Significant experience with the use of engineered low-permeability soil components in landfill<br />

liner system designs has been gained over the past three decades. To function adequately over<br />

its required useful life, a CCL or GCL must maintain a hydraulic conductivity no greater than its<br />

design value during this timeframe. As discussed by Rowe (1998), provided that a GCL has been<br />

properly designed, installed, and protected from desiccation, and provided that appropriate<br />

attention has been given to the chemical compatibility of the low-permeability soil layer with the<br />

anticipated leachate, the GCL should meet its hydraulic conductivity criterion for hundreds to<br />

thousands of years when used in a composite liner in a MSW landfill. For a CCL under these<br />

same design and construction constraints, the service life is even longer, on the order of thousands<br />

of years. This is the reason that CCLs are used in liner systems for containment of critical wastes<br />

(e.g., radioactive waste) and are relied upon to protect HHE over exceptionally long periods of<br />

time (i.e., tens of thousands of years).<br />

MD10186.doc 127 29 March 2009

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!