AREA A/B ENGINEERING REPORT - Waste Management
AREA A/B ENGINEERING REPORT - Waste Management
AREA A/B ENGINEERING REPORT - Waste Management
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Geosyntec Consultants<br />
begins to be observed. Oxidation reactions then proceed slowly throughout the service life of<br />
HDPE geomembranes and, eventually, the geomembrane will likely become brittle to the extent<br />
that it is considered to have reached the end of its service life (Rowe & Sangam, 2002). In their<br />
research report for the USEPA, Koerner & Hsuan (2002) select this point as the 50 percent<br />
reduction in a specific design property, such as tensile stress at break, although they note that<br />
even with this reduction in design property the geomembrane can still function, albeit at a<br />
decreased performance level. With this conservative endpoint defined, the service life of HDPE<br />
geomembranes was estimated to be on the order of a thousand years: approximately 200 years<br />
for antioxidant depletion, over 20 years for induction of geomembrane oxidation, and 750 years<br />
for 50 percent degradation of strength properties (Bonaparte, et al., 2002a).<br />
Although a geomembrane may lose strength over time, Rowe & Sangam (2002) highlighted that<br />
the real service life of a geomembrane depends on the hydraulic and diffusive properties of the<br />
geomembrane. Thus, a geomembrane may lose strength while still performing satisfactorily as a<br />
barrier. Accordingly, the true hydraulic and diffusive service life of a geomembrane may<br />
significantly exceed the service life determined based on the degradation of the physical and<br />
mechanical properties, especially if the tensile stresses are minimal. Furthermore, burial or<br />
submersion of a geomembrane can lessen the rate of antioxidant depletion and geomembrane<br />
oxidation by decreasing the availability of oxygen. In the case of a geomembrane liner for a<br />
MSW landfill, biodegradation of waste will probably consume most of the available oxygen<br />
above the liner well before the end of PCC period (perhaps even as soon as shortly after the<br />
start of PCC).<br />
The low-permeability soil component of a Subtitle D composite liner typically consists of a<br />
compacted clay liner (CCL), a geosynthetic clay liner (GCL), or a GCL overlying a CCL.<br />
Significant experience with the use of engineered low-permeability soil components in landfill<br />
liner system designs has been gained over the past three decades. To function adequately over<br />
its required useful life, a CCL or GCL must maintain a hydraulic conductivity no greater than its<br />
design value during this timeframe. As discussed by Rowe (1998), provided that a GCL has been<br />
properly designed, installed, and protected from desiccation, and provided that appropriate<br />
attention has been given to the chemical compatibility of the low-permeability soil layer with the<br />
anticipated leachate, the GCL should meet its hydraulic conductivity criterion for hundreds to<br />
thousands of years when used in a composite liner in a MSW landfill. For a CCL under these<br />
same design and construction constraints, the service life is even longer, on the order of thousands<br />
of years. This is the reason that CCLs are used in liner systems for containment of critical wastes<br />
(e.g., radioactive waste) and are relied upon to protect HHE over exceptionally long periods of<br />
time (i.e., tens of thousands of years).<br />
MD10186.doc 127 29 March 2009