AREA A/B ENGINEERING REPORT - Waste Management

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Geosyntec Consultants Rachor I., Jacobs J., Scharff H., Gebert J. (2008) “Suitability of different substrates for methane oxidation in landfill covers.” Proc. 5 th Intercont. Landfill Res. Symp., Sept 10-12, 2008, Copper Mountain, CO. Rohde J.R., Gribb M.M. (1990) “Biological and Particulate Clogging of Geotextile/Soil Filter Systems.” In: Geosynthetic Testing for Waste Containment Applications, ASTM STP 1081, R.M. Koerner (Ed.), 299-312. Rowe, R.K. (1998) “Geosynthetics and the Minimization of Contaminant Migration Through Barrier Systems Beneath Solid Waste.” Keynote Paper: 6th Int. Conf. Geosynthetics, Atlanta, GA. Rowe R.K. (2005) “Long-Term Performance of Contaminant Barrier Systems.” Geotechnique 55(9), 631-678. Rowe R.K., Sangam H.P. (2002) “Durability of HDPE Geomembranes.” Geotextiles & Geomembranes 20, 77-95. Rowe R.K., Van Gulck J.F. (2004) “Filtering and Drainage of Contaminated Water.” Keynote Paper: GeoFilters 2004, Stellenbosch, South Africa. Sangam H.P. (2001) “Performance of HDPE Geomembrane Liners in Landfill Applications.” Ph.D. Dissertation: Univ. Western Ontario, Ontario, Canada. Sangam H.P., Rowe R.K. (2002) “Effects of Exposure Conditions on the Depletion of Antioxidants from High-density Polyethylene (HDPE) Geomembranes.” Canadian Geotech. J. 39(6), 1221- 1230. Scheutz C., Bogner J., Morcet M., Kjeldsen P. (2003) “Aerobic degradation of non-methane organic compounds in landfill cover soils.” Proc. Sardinia 2003, 9th Int. Waste Manage. & Landfill Symp., 6-10 October, 2003, Cagliari, Italy. Scheutz C., Kjeldsen P, Bogner J.E., De Visscher A., Gebert J., Hilger H.A., Huber-Humer M., Spokas K. (2009) “Microbial methane oxidation processes and technologies for mitigation of landfill gas emissions.” Waste Manag. Res. 27(5), 409-455. Solid Waste Industry for Climate Solutions (2009) “Current MSW Industry Position and State-ofthe-Practice on LFG Collection Efficiency, Methane Oxidation, and carbon Sequestration in Landfills.” Prep. By SCS Engineers, Sacramento, CA, Version 2.2, Rev. January 2009. Spokas, K., Bogner, J., Chanton, J.P., Morcet, M., Aran, C., Graff, C., Moreau-Le Golvan, Y., I. Hebe (2006) “Methane Mass Balance at Three Landfill Sites: What is the Efficiency of Capture by Gas Collection Systems?” Waste Manag., 26(5), 516-525. United States Environmental Protection Agency (1995) “AP-42, Fifth Edition, Compilation of Air Pollutant Emission Factors, Volume 1: Stationary Point and Area Sources, Section 2.4: Municipal Solid Waste Landfills.” Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, Research Triangle Park, NC, January 1995, Supplement E (November 1998), draft update in review (October 2008). United States Environmental Protection Agency (1996) “Standards of Performance for New Stationary Sources.” Federal Register, 40 CFR Part 60. USEPA, Washington, DC. MD10186.doc 141 29 March 2009
Geosyntec Consultants United States Environmental Protection Agency (2005) “Landfill Gas Emissions Model (LandGEM), Version 3.02 User’s Guide.” EPA-600/R-05/047, Office of Research and Development, Research Triangle Park, NC, May 2005. United States Environmental Protection Agency (2006) “Solid Waste Management and Greenhouse Gases: A Life-Cycle Assessment of Emissions and Sinks (3rd Edition).” USEPA Report, updated October 2006. Van Gulck J.F., Rowe R.K. (2004) “Influence of Landfill Leachate Suspended Solids on Clog (Biorock) Formation.” Waste Manag. 24, 723-738. MD10186.doc 142 29 March 2009
Page 1 and 2:
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AT THE MAN
Page 3 and 4:
TABLE OF CONTENTS Geosyntec Consult
Page 5 and 6:
TABLE OF CONTENTS (continued) Geosy
Page 7 and 8:
TABLE OF CONTENTS (continued) Geosy
Page 9 and 10:
DEFINITIONS AND LIST OF ACRONYMS AC
Page 11 and 12:
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Geosyntec Consult
Page 13 and 14:
Geosyntec Consultants time, the lan
Page 15 and 16:
Long-Term Liner System Performance
Page 17 and 18:
Geosyntec Consultants generation is
Page 19 and 20:
Geosyntec Consultants cover systems
Page 21 and 22:
Beyond Waste Containment - Landfill
Page 23 and 24:
Geosyntec Consultants • Section 3
Page 25 and 26:
Geosyntec Consultants Required by r
Page 27 and 28:
• Landfill gas system monitoring
Page 29 and 30:
Geosyntec Consultants An extensive
Page 31 and 32:
1.4.2 Permanent Storage of Biogenic
Page 33 and 34:
2. REGULATORY OVERSIGHT OF MANAGED
Page 35 and 36:
2.2.1 Siting Considerations Geosynt
Page 37 and 38:
Geosyntec Consultants The LCRS is i
Page 39 and 40:
• Control moisture and percolatio
Page 41 and 42:
3. DESIGN COMPONENT SYSTEMS OF A MA
Page 43 and 44:
Prescriptive Final Cover System 1.
Page 45 and 46:
3.2.2 Key Environmentally Protectiv
Page 47 and 48:
Geosyntec Consultants selected and
Page 49 and 50:
Geosyntec Consultants • Leachate
Page 51 and 52:
Geosyntec Consultants secondary, an
Page 53 and 54:
Geosyntec Consultants along with re
Page 55 and 56:
Geosyntec Consultants cover surface
Page 57 and 58:
3.5 Gas Management System Geosyntec
Page 59 and 60:
Geosyntec Consultants • Passive c
Page 61 and 62:
Geosyntec Consultants out certain p
Page 63 and 64:
Geosyntec Consultants on the curren
Page 65 and 66:
4. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OF A M
Page 67 and 68:
Geosyntec Consultants permit condit
Page 69 and 70:
Geosyntec Consultants • Standard
Page 71 and 72:
Geosyntec Consultants Design of the
Page 73 and 74:
Geosyntec Consultants waste constit
Page 75 and 76:
5. ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AT MANA
Page 77 and 78:
Geosyntec Consultants safeguards fo
Page 79 and 80:
Geosyntec Consultants LFG migration
Page 81 and 82:
Geosyntec Consultants Other example
Page 83 and 84:
Geosyntec Consultants operation is
Page 85 and 86:
Geosyntec Consultants landfill syst
Page 87 and 88:
Geosyntec Consultants behind the li
Page 89 and 90:
Table 6-0: Summary of Section 6 Tab
Page 91 and 92:
Containment Attribute Siting and De
Page 93 and 94:
Waste Treatment Attribute Siting an
Page 95 and 96:
Environmental and Performance Monit
Page 97 and 98: they help reduce the dependency on
Page 99 and 100: Geosyntec Consultants that landfill
Page 101 and 102: 7.4 Increased Beneficial End Use Op
Page 103 and 104: 8. REFERENCES Geosyntec Consultants
Page 105 and 106: Geosyntec Consultants Eid H.T., Sta
Page 107 and 108: Geosyntec Consultants Koerner R.M.,
Page 109 and 110: Geosyntec Consultants Sangam H.P.,
Page 111 and 112: Geosyntec Consultants Wardwell R.E.
Page 113 and 114: I II III IV V VI VII VIII Figure A-
Page 115 and 116: • Long-terms trends in MSW leacha
Page 117 and 118: Geosyntec Consultants sites of diff
Page 119 and 120: A2.1.5 Development of a “Biofilte
Page 121 and 122: Geosyntec Consultants impact health
Page 123 and 124: Geosyntec Consultants updated despi
Page 125 and 126: Geosyntec Consultants Gibbons R.D.,
Page 127 and 128: Geosyntec Consultants Pivato A., Mo
Page 129 and 130: Geosyntec Consultants Youcai Z., Hu
Page 131 and 132: • Long-term performance of leacha
Page 133 and 134: AVERAGE LCRS FLOW RATE (lphd) 100,0
Page 135 and 136: B3. LONG-TERM PERFORMANCE OF LEACHA
Page 137 and 138: B4. FINAL COVER SYSTEM PERFORMANCE
Page 139 and 140: Geosyntec Consultants compacted but
Page 141 and 142: Geosyntec Consultants various pract
Page 143 and 144: Geosyntec Consultants In summary, a
Page 145 and 146: REFERENCES Geosyntec Consultants Ab
Page 147: Geosyntec Consultants Humer M., Lec
Page 151 and 152: Geosyntec Consultants These three s
Page 153 and 154: Geosyntec Consultants discontinue o
Page 155 and 156: C4. LONG-TERM INTEGRITY OF LANDFILL
Page 157 and 158: Geosyntec Consultants well known, t
Page 159: Geosyntec Consultants Zekkos D., Br
show all

AREA A/B ENGINEERING REPORT - Waste Management

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?