19.01.2013 Views

AREA A/B ENGINEERING REPORT - Waste Management

AREA A/B ENGINEERING REPORT - Waste Management

AREA A/B ENGINEERING REPORT - Waste Management

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Geosyntec Consultants<br />

cover surface. If leachate or gas emission rates unexpectedly increase, the cause of this<br />

phenomenon is be investigated and addressed. Although some have posed concerns about final<br />

cover system failure, this is unlikely as evidenced by low to negligible leachate generation rates<br />

and continually downward trends observed at modern MSW landfills currently in PCC. 14 Further,<br />

as discussed in Section 3.2.3, the expected service life of a GM barrier layer in a composite<br />

cover system is of the order of 1,000 years, comparable to the long-term performance of GM<br />

barrier materials in liner systems. Similarly, whether in combination with an upper GM component<br />

or as a single-layer cover system, a low-permeability CCL provides an excellent long-term robust<br />

barrier to precipitation.<br />

Performance of Landfills during Severe Natural Events<br />

Investigations of landfill covers and environmental protection systems following a<br />

severe natural event suggest that landfills are highly resistant to damage from<br />

such events. Studies performed after the Florida hurricanes of 2004 (Roberts, et<br />

al., 2005), the Northridge and Loma Prieta earthquakes in California (Matasovic<br />

& Kavazanjian, 1998), and the San Diego wildfires of 2003 showed that the<br />

integrity of landfills had not been compromised. The only damage that occurred<br />

was to surface features such as vegetation and LFG vents that were repaired at<br />

minimal cost.<br />

Although the final cover is far more accessible for maintenance and repair over the long term, its<br />

design and construction is managed with the same level of care and foresight as the liner system.<br />

If properly maintained, something relatively easily achieved, the CCL should meet its hydraulic<br />

conductivity criterion for several thousand years. The cover maintenance required for closed<br />

MSW landfills is primarily related to cover system vegetation (e.g., mowing, tree removal, revegetating),<br />

and erosion and sediment control (e.g., removal of sediment from ditches and ponds,<br />

re-grading the top deck to promote drainage). A significant portion of cover system maintenance<br />

is related to upkeep of the stormwater management system to provide proper drainage (i.e.,<br />

cover drainage features, sediment trapping devices, retention/sediment control ponds, diversion<br />

channels, silt fences and other sediment control devices, and vegetation). 15<br />

The design and use of all-soil evapotranspirative (ET) final covers was pioneered at older landfills<br />

with pre-Subtitle D liner systems, generally at sites located in dry climates. The performance of<br />

14 In USEPA-sponsored studies by Bonaparte (1995) and Othman, et al (2002), the observed leachate generation<br />

rates for MSW landfills have shown continually downward trends post-closure.<br />

15 The expected service life and long-term maintenance requirements of cover systems is discussed in a number of<br />

seminal references, including Koerner & Hsuan (2002) and in the USPEA’s “Technical Guidance for RCRA/CERCLA Final<br />

Covers” (Bonaparte, et al, 2002b).<br />

MD10186.doc 48 29 March 2009

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!