AREA A/B ENGINEERING REPORT - Waste Management
AREA A/B ENGINEERING REPORT - Waste Management
AREA A/B ENGINEERING REPORT - Waste Management
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Geosyntec Consultants<br />
cover surface. If leachate or gas emission rates unexpectedly increase, the cause of this<br />
phenomenon is be investigated and addressed. Although some have posed concerns about final<br />
cover system failure, this is unlikely as evidenced by low to negligible leachate generation rates<br />
and continually downward trends observed at modern MSW landfills currently in PCC. 14 Further,<br />
as discussed in Section 3.2.3, the expected service life of a GM barrier layer in a composite<br />
cover system is of the order of 1,000 years, comparable to the long-term performance of GM<br />
barrier materials in liner systems. Similarly, whether in combination with an upper GM component<br />
or as a single-layer cover system, a low-permeability CCL provides an excellent long-term robust<br />
barrier to precipitation.<br />
Performance of Landfills during Severe Natural Events<br />
Investigations of landfill covers and environmental protection systems following a<br />
severe natural event suggest that landfills are highly resistant to damage from<br />
such events. Studies performed after the Florida hurricanes of 2004 (Roberts, et<br />
al., 2005), the Northridge and Loma Prieta earthquakes in California (Matasovic<br />
& Kavazanjian, 1998), and the San Diego wildfires of 2003 showed that the<br />
integrity of landfills had not been compromised. The only damage that occurred<br />
was to surface features such as vegetation and LFG vents that were repaired at<br />
minimal cost.<br />
Although the final cover is far more accessible for maintenance and repair over the long term, its<br />
design and construction is managed with the same level of care and foresight as the liner system.<br />
If properly maintained, something relatively easily achieved, the CCL should meet its hydraulic<br />
conductivity criterion for several thousand years. The cover maintenance required for closed<br />
MSW landfills is primarily related to cover system vegetation (e.g., mowing, tree removal, revegetating),<br />
and erosion and sediment control (e.g., removal of sediment from ditches and ponds,<br />
re-grading the top deck to promote drainage). A significant portion of cover system maintenance<br />
is related to upkeep of the stormwater management system to provide proper drainage (i.e.,<br />
cover drainage features, sediment trapping devices, retention/sediment control ponds, diversion<br />
channels, silt fences and other sediment control devices, and vegetation). 15<br />
The design and use of all-soil evapotranspirative (ET) final covers was pioneered at older landfills<br />
with pre-Subtitle D liner systems, generally at sites located in dry climates. The performance of<br />
14 In USEPA-sponsored studies by Bonaparte (1995) and Othman, et al (2002), the observed leachate generation<br />
rates for MSW landfills have shown continually downward trends post-closure.<br />
15 The expected service life and long-term maintenance requirements of cover systems is discussed in a number of<br />
seminal references, including Koerner & Hsuan (2002) and in the USPEA’s “Technical Guidance for RCRA/CERCLA Final<br />
Covers” (Bonaparte, et al, 2002b).<br />
MD10186.doc 48 29 March 2009