28.01.2013 Views

Annual Meeting - SCEC.org

Annual Meeting - SCEC.org

Annual Meeting - SCEC.org

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Poster Abstracts | Group 1 – GMP<br />

motions can potentially occur during strong ground shaking as the result of the soil being much<br />

softer than the building foundation. The vertical motion is characterized by spectral peaks at 0.71<br />

Hz, 0.82 Hz, 1.1 Hz, and higher. These are larger than the first few modes of horizontal vibrations.<br />

Computing the spectral ratios between the top floor and basement for evidence of soil-structure<br />

interactions is a topic for further research. We also analyze the peak rocking motion as a function of<br />

earthquake distance and magnitude.<br />

1-051<br />

"RUPTURE-TO-RAFTERS" SYNTHETIC GROUND MOTIONS AND THE ROLE OF<br />

NONLINEAR SITE RESPONSE PREDICTIONS Asimaki D, and Li W<br />

Overarching goal of our research is to develop quantitative criteria that will allow efficient<br />

integration of site response models in broadband ground motion simulations. For this purpose, we<br />

combine downhole array observations and broadband ground motion synthetics and study the<br />

prediction sensitivity of ground surface motion and nonlinear structural performance due to the<br />

bias and uncertainty in nonlinear site response simulation. This work focuses on three downhole<br />

arrays in Southern California installed at medium to soft soil sites, where we have evaluated<br />

broadband synthetics based on the regional geology and fault systems for finite-source dynamic<br />

rupture scenarios of weak, medium and large magnitude events (M = 3.5~7.5), on a surface station<br />

grid of epicentral distances 2km~75km. For each site, we conduct elastic and nonlinear analyses<br />

using multiple soil models, and first estimate the modeling ground motion variability by means of<br />

the COV (coefficient of variation) of site amplification. For each model, we then assess the<br />

parametric uncertainty of ground motion predictions by systematically randomizing selected input<br />

parameters. Based on our results, we develop a frequency index, which, combined with the ground<br />

motion intensity, is used as a quantitative measure to describe the site and ground motion<br />

combinations where the nonlinear models show large prediction COV, namely where incremental<br />

nonlinear analyses significantly deviate from empirical methodologies. We finally illustrate the role<br />

of nonlinear soil response simulation in physics-based seismic hazard predictions by subjecting a<br />

series of inelastic SDOF (single-degree-of-freedom) to the ensemble of ground motion predictions<br />

obtained via the alternative site response methodologies. The bias and uncertainty in the structural<br />

response predictions is also evaluated as a function of the frequency-intensity criteria proposed in<br />

this work, to quantify the propagation of site response modeling variability to the assessment of<br />

structural performance measures in rupture-to-rafters simulations. Our results show that large<br />

sensitivity in the selection of site response methodology yields high bias and uncertainty in the<br />

assessment of the inelastic displacement ratio for nonlinear structural response predictions,<br />

indicating the efficiency of the proposed criteria for the optimal selection of site response model.<br />

1-052<br />

COMPARISON OF MEASURED VS30 VALUES AGAINST VS30 PREDICTIONS BASED<br />

ON TOPOGRAPHIC SLOPE Pancha A, Louie JN, Yong A, Thompson M, and Dhar M<br />

Independently, geology and topographic slope have been used as predictors of shallow shear wave<br />

velocity (Vs30 or the average shear-wave velocity in the upper 30 meters) for seismic hazard<br />

assessment. In the former approach, dominant grain size within site-response units have been<br />

observed to correlate to variations in shallow Vs30 (e.g., Borcherdt 1970; Tinsley & Fumal, 1985;<br />

Fumal & Tinsley, 1985; Wills et al., 2000; Wills & Clahan, 2006). In the latter approach, topographic<br />

slope has been introduced as a correlative to Vs30, which can be easily computed from readily<br />

available DEMs to provide first-order maps of site conditions (Allen & Wald, 2007; Wald & Allen,<br />

2007). These maps predict shallow shear-wave velocity on the basis of Vs30 and slope correlations.<br />

We compare results from 509 sites having observed Vs30 measurements acquired through the<br />

refraction microtremor surface-wave dispersion analysis method, against the predicted Vs30 from<br />

96 | Southern California Earthquake Center

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!