Annual Meeting - SCEC.org
Annual Meeting - SCEC.org
Annual Meeting - SCEC.org
- TAGS
- annual
- meeting
- www.scec.org
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Poster Abstracts | Group 1 – GMP<br />
motions can potentially occur during strong ground shaking as the result of the soil being much<br />
softer than the building foundation. The vertical motion is characterized by spectral peaks at 0.71<br />
Hz, 0.82 Hz, 1.1 Hz, and higher. These are larger than the first few modes of horizontal vibrations.<br />
Computing the spectral ratios between the top floor and basement for evidence of soil-structure<br />
interactions is a topic for further research. We also analyze the peak rocking motion as a function of<br />
earthquake distance and magnitude.<br />
1-051<br />
"RUPTURE-TO-RAFTERS" SYNTHETIC GROUND MOTIONS AND THE ROLE OF<br />
NONLINEAR SITE RESPONSE PREDICTIONS Asimaki D, and Li W<br />
Overarching goal of our research is to develop quantitative criteria that will allow efficient<br />
integration of site response models in broadband ground motion simulations. For this purpose, we<br />
combine downhole array observations and broadband ground motion synthetics and study the<br />
prediction sensitivity of ground surface motion and nonlinear structural performance due to the<br />
bias and uncertainty in nonlinear site response simulation. This work focuses on three downhole<br />
arrays in Southern California installed at medium to soft soil sites, where we have evaluated<br />
broadband synthetics based on the regional geology and fault systems for finite-source dynamic<br />
rupture scenarios of weak, medium and large magnitude events (M = 3.5~7.5), on a surface station<br />
grid of epicentral distances 2km~75km. For each site, we conduct elastic and nonlinear analyses<br />
using multiple soil models, and first estimate the modeling ground motion variability by means of<br />
the COV (coefficient of variation) of site amplification. For each model, we then assess the<br />
parametric uncertainty of ground motion predictions by systematically randomizing selected input<br />
parameters. Based on our results, we develop a frequency index, which, combined with the ground<br />
motion intensity, is used as a quantitative measure to describe the site and ground motion<br />
combinations where the nonlinear models show large prediction COV, namely where incremental<br />
nonlinear analyses significantly deviate from empirical methodologies. We finally illustrate the role<br />
of nonlinear soil response simulation in physics-based seismic hazard predictions by subjecting a<br />
series of inelastic SDOF (single-degree-of-freedom) to the ensemble of ground motion predictions<br />
obtained via the alternative site response methodologies. The bias and uncertainty in the structural<br />
response predictions is also evaluated as a function of the frequency-intensity criteria proposed in<br />
this work, to quantify the propagation of site response modeling variability to the assessment of<br />
structural performance measures in rupture-to-rafters simulations. Our results show that large<br />
sensitivity in the selection of site response methodology yields high bias and uncertainty in the<br />
assessment of the inelastic displacement ratio for nonlinear structural response predictions,<br />
indicating the efficiency of the proposed criteria for the optimal selection of site response model.<br />
1-052<br />
COMPARISON OF MEASURED VS30 VALUES AGAINST VS30 PREDICTIONS BASED<br />
ON TOPOGRAPHIC SLOPE Pancha A, Louie JN, Yong A, Thompson M, and Dhar M<br />
Independently, geology and topographic slope have been used as predictors of shallow shear wave<br />
velocity (Vs30 or the average shear-wave velocity in the upper 30 meters) for seismic hazard<br />
assessment. In the former approach, dominant grain size within site-response units have been<br />
observed to correlate to variations in shallow Vs30 (e.g., Borcherdt 1970; Tinsley & Fumal, 1985;<br />
Fumal & Tinsley, 1985; Wills et al., 2000; Wills & Clahan, 2006). In the latter approach, topographic<br />
slope has been introduced as a correlative to Vs30, which can be easily computed from readily<br />
available DEMs to provide first-order maps of site conditions (Allen & Wald, 2007; Wald & Allen,<br />
2007). These maps predict shallow shear-wave velocity on the basis of Vs30 and slope correlations.<br />
We compare results from 509 sites having observed Vs30 measurements acquired through the<br />
refraction microtremor surface-wave dispersion analysis method, against the predicted Vs30 from<br />
96 | Southern California Earthquake Center