28.01.2013 Views

Annual Meeting - SCEC.org

Annual Meeting - SCEC.org

Annual Meeting - SCEC.org

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Group 2 – FARM | Poster Abstracts<br />

Fault Rupture and Mechanics (FARM)<br />

2-058<br />

CORRELATION OF FAULT SEGMENTS WITH RUPTURE SEGMENTS AS A<br />

FUNCTION OF GEOMETRICAL COMPLEXITY AND STRUCTURAL CHANGES Zielke<br />

O, and Arrowsmith JR<br />

Most long active faults have historically ruptured over only a part of their total length in large<br />

earthquakes. Surface ruptures often terminate at geometric or structural discontinuities in the fault<br />

zone, leading to speculation that faults may be portioned into consistent rupture segments along<br />

which slip is restricted to the individual segment where it initiated. In this hypothesis, the<br />

maximum earthquake magnitude for each segment can be estimated (via scaling relationships; e.g.,<br />

Wells and Coppersmith, 1984), even in the absence of historic large earthquakes. This approach<br />

requires definition of fault segments based on changes in physical properties along the fault. The<br />

question arises then of what scale the property change (e.g., fault orientation, fault roughness,<br />

frictional behavior, and downward extension of fault) must be to cause partial or full segmentation,<br />

and where partial segmentation allows multi-segment rupture and full segmentation does not.<br />

Using the numerical earthquake simulator “FIMozFric”, we investigate the effect of geometric and<br />

structural changes of the fault zone on rupture segmentation by systematically changing<br />

parameters that control fault segmentation (fault roughness, bends, stepovers, and gaps). The<br />

simulator creates long (~10’s kyrs) seismic records including time, magnitude, rupture length,<br />

rupture width, slip distribution, and surface displacement of each earthquake. While identification<br />

of fault segments is based on fault geometry and structure, we look at the surface displacement of<br />

individual events to identify rupture segments. Then we compare fault and rupture segments for<br />

each record to determine their correlation as well as the probability of multi-segment rupture as a<br />

function of geometric and structural control. At this stage, we test methods to quantify the different<br />

geometric discontinuities based on their surface expression.<br />

The results of this study may be applied by seismologists and paleoseismologists to define rupture<br />

segments based on structurally-defined fault segments. The definition of rupture segments allows<br />

estimating the maximum earthquake magnitude that may occur on an individual segment as well<br />

as the probability of multisegment rupture –both being important in seismic hazard assessment.<br />

2-059<br />

INFLUENCE OF HETEROGENEOUS COUPLING ON THE SPATIAL PATTERN AND<br />

RECURRENCE OF SEISMIC RUPTURES Kaneko Y, Avouac J, and Lapusta N<br />

Inspired by the recent Sumatra subduction earthquake sequence (2004 - present) on the Sunda<br />

megathrust, we explore the behavior of a simple fault model with lateral variations of frictional<br />

properties designed to induce lateral variations of the degree of coupling (i.e., the proportion of<br />

seismic to aseismic slip). The model consists of two velocity-weakening (potentially locked)<br />

segments separated and surrounded by velocity-strengthening (potentially creeping) zones. The<br />

width of the central velocity-strengthening zone and the laboratory-derived friction parameters are<br />

adjusted so that each locked segment can be ruptured independently or the rupture can sometimes<br />

propagate across the central creeping zone, producing a larger earthquake event. Despite its<br />

simplicity, the model produces complex earthquake cycles with a variety of earthquake slip<br />

patterns. The model can be used to qualitatively explain the relation of interseismic coupling to coseismic<br />

asperities on the Sunda Megathrust. By varying the strength and width of the velocitystrengthening<br />

region, we identify the parameter regime in which such region would act either as a<br />

“permanent” or as a “weak” barrier to the coseismic rupture over many earthquake cycles. The<br />

2008 <strong>SCEC</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Meeting</strong> | 171

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!