28.01.2013 Views

Annual Meeting - SCEC.org

Annual Meeting - SCEC.org

Annual Meeting - SCEC.org

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Group 2 – Tectonic Geodesy | Poster Abstracts<br />

longer distance and reached the maximum slip of 8.5 m about 130 km northeast of the epicenter. It<br />

was presumably the cause of huge damage at nearby Beichuan city. Northeast of Beichuan city, the<br />

rupture on Beichuan fault significantly reduced, accompanying with the rupture of a large blind<br />

thrust on Pengguan fault. The later apparently triggered the strike-slip motion on the last segement<br />

of Beichuan fault at 180 km northeast of the epicenter at about 75 sec.<br />

2-026<br />

MODELING AND DETECTION OF SEISMIC SWARMS TRIGGERED BY ASEISMIC<br />

TRANSIENTS Llenos AL, McGuire JJ, and Ogata Y<br />

The rate of earthquake occurrence varies by many orders of magnitude in a given region due to<br />

variations in the stress state of the crust. Of particular interest are variations in seismicity rate<br />

triggered by transient aseismic processes such as fluid flow, fault creep or magma intrusion. While<br />

these processes have been shown to trigger earthquakes, implementing an inversion algorithm that<br />

can map seismicity variations into estimates of stress rate variations has been challenging.<br />

Essentially aftershock sequences can obscure changes in the background seismicity rate resulting<br />

from aseismic processes. Two common approaches for estimating the time dependence of the<br />

underlying driving mechanisms are the stochastic Epidemic Type Aftershock Sequence model<br />

(ETAS) (Ogata, 1988) and a physical approach based on the rate-and state-model of fault friction<br />

(Dieterich, 1994). The models have different strengths that could be combined to allow more<br />

quantitative studies of earthquake triggering. To accomplish this, we identify the parameters that<br />

relate to one another in the two models and examine their dependence on stressing rate. A<br />

particular conflict arises because the rate-state model predicts that aftershock productivity scales<br />

with stressing rate while the ETAS model assumes that it is time independent. To resolve this issue,<br />

we estimate triggering parameters for 4 earthquake swarms associated with geodetically observed<br />

deformation transients in various tectonic environments. Our results suggest that stressing rate<br />

transients increase the background seismicity rate without affecting aftershock productivity.<br />

We can then specify a combined model for seismicity rate variations that can be used in a data<br />

assimilation algorithm to invert seismicity catalogs for variations in aseismic stressing rates. For a<br />

given earthquake catalog, we produce maximum likelihood estimates of the ETAS parameters and<br />

use an extended Kalman filter to estimate the evolution of underlying state variables (background<br />

stress rate, aseismic stress rate, and \gamma of the rate-state model). We have tested our algorithm<br />

on the 2005 Obsidian Buttes earthquake swarm, which was triggered by geodetically-observed<br />

shallow aseismic creep (Lohman and McGuire, 2007). Our algorithm successfully detects the<br />

swarm and produces an estimate of the aseismic stressing rate transient that triggered it. Our<br />

method therefore has the potential to be a highly sensitive detector of transient deformation.<br />

2-027<br />

COMBINING GPS AND METEOROLOGICAL DATA TO MITIGATE ATMOSPHERIC<br />

PHASE IN INTERFEROGRAMS: THE SAN GABRIEL VALLEY, CALIFORNIA Funning<br />

GJ, Houlié N, and Burgmann R<br />

GPS and InSAR data both independently sample the troposphere state at the time of observation.<br />

Given the recent proliferation of continuous GPS sites, the use of this redundant information to<br />

characterise and remove tropospheric signals from InSAR data is becoming increasingly viable.<br />

This capability is critical if transient deformation signals are to be identified with confidence.<br />

Here we focus on data from southern California, where a dense continuous GPS network and a<br />

diverse set of tectonic and nontectonic deformation sources make for an excellent test site. We<br />

focus on an uplift transient that occurred in the San Gabriel valley, approximately 30 km NE of Los<br />

2008 <strong>SCEC</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Meeting</strong> | 151

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!