28.01.2013 Views

Annual Meeting - SCEC.org

Annual Meeting - SCEC.org

Annual Meeting - SCEC.org

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Poster Abstracts | Group 2 – FARM<br />

each of several long segments, but abrupt changes between the segments (e.g., ~3.5 m in Cholame<br />

segment, ~9.0 m in Carrizo segment). A similar study by Lienkaemper (2001) concentrated on the<br />

Cholame segment. Although data were too sparse and ambiguous to resolve details of the 1857<br />

slip, the slip amount was determined to be distinctively larger (~5 m) than previously estimated.<br />

Both studies relied mainly on field observation and aerial photographs of offset landforms --mostly<br />

ephemeral channels crossing the fault trace(s) at high angles.<br />

We use “B4” LiDAR high resolution topographic data (resolution: 0.25 m) to determine the slip<br />

distribution of the 1857 earthquake along the Cholame and Carrizo fault segments. After fault line<br />

and offset linear features (i.e., fluvial channels) are traced at a site, we determine the position of<br />

upstream and downstream profile. Then we back-slip one profile relative to the other in 0.1m<br />

increments and calculate the elevation difference between both profiles. The amount of slip where<br />

the difference between both profiles has its minimum is considered the optimal displacement<br />

estimate. We measured offsets for channels identified by previous studies and utilized the<br />

spectacular resolution of the LiDAR data to find additional geomorphic features that were offset in<br />

1857 and prior earthquakes.<br />

Although this work is still in progress, preliminary results show relatively uniform slip of ~4.6m<br />

for the Cholame Segment. Inspection of offset gullies not previously identified along the Carrizo<br />

Segment suggest that the ramping (increase in slip from 3 to 9m) proposed by Sieh (1978) may not<br />

occur. In the Carrizo Plain, we found a number of gullies that were offset by only 4-6m, suggesting<br />

that the observed 9m offsets may be the result of more than one earthquake.<br />

2-045<br />

TECTONIC GEOMORPHOLOGY OF THE SAN ANDREAS FAULT ZONE FROM<br />

HIGH RESOLUTION TOPOGRAPHY: AN EXAMPLE FROM THE CHOLAME<br />

SEGMENT Arrowsmith JR, and Zielke O<br />

High resolution topographic data along fault zones are important aids in the delineation of recently<br />

active breaks. A 15 km-long portion of the south-central San Andreas Fault (SAF) along the<br />

southern Cholame segment preserves spectacular tectonic landforms such as benches, troughs,<br />

scarps, and aligned ridges that indicate recurring earthquake slip. Recently acquired LiDAR<br />

topographic data along the entire southern SAF (“B4” project) have shot densities of 3-4 m^2.<br />

Computed from the LiDAR returns, Digital Elevation Models (DEMs) of 0.25 to 0.5 m resolution<br />

using local binning with inverse distance weighting and 0.8 m or larger search radii depict the<br />

tectonic landforms at paleoseismic sites well enough to rate them confidently. Mapping of recently<br />

active breaks using a LiDAR-only based approach compares well with aerial photographic and<br />

field based methods. The fault zone varies in width from meters to nearly 1 km and is comprised of<br />

numerous en echelon meter to km-length overlapping sub parallel fault surfaces bounding<br />

differentially moving blocks elongate parallel to the SAF. The semantic variations of what<br />

constitutes “active” and the importance of secondary traces influence the breadth and complexity<br />

of the resulting fault trace maps.<br />

2-046<br />

THE SAN ANDREAS FAULT ZONE IN SAN GORGONIO PASS: A GEOLOGIC-<br />

FRAMEWORK PERSPECTIVE Matti JC<br />

The pioneering work of C.R. Allen (1957) in San G<strong>org</strong>onio Pass (SGP) demonstrated three points<br />

that have stood the test of time. First, a single throughgoing trace of the modern San Andreas Fault<br />

(SAF) cannot be mapped confidently through the Pass; second, the architecture of the SAF zone in<br />

the Pass is extraordinarily complex; third, any SAF rupture is likely to be complicated. For these<br />

162 | Southern California Earthquake Center

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!