Annual Meeting - SCEC.org
Annual Meeting - SCEC.org
Annual Meeting - SCEC.org
- TAGS
- annual
- meeting
- www.scec.org
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Poster Abstracts | Group 2 – FARM<br />
each of several long segments, but abrupt changes between the segments (e.g., ~3.5 m in Cholame<br />
segment, ~9.0 m in Carrizo segment). A similar study by Lienkaemper (2001) concentrated on the<br />
Cholame segment. Although data were too sparse and ambiguous to resolve details of the 1857<br />
slip, the slip amount was determined to be distinctively larger (~5 m) than previously estimated.<br />
Both studies relied mainly on field observation and aerial photographs of offset landforms --mostly<br />
ephemeral channels crossing the fault trace(s) at high angles.<br />
We use “B4” LiDAR high resolution topographic data (resolution: 0.25 m) to determine the slip<br />
distribution of the 1857 earthquake along the Cholame and Carrizo fault segments. After fault line<br />
and offset linear features (i.e., fluvial channels) are traced at a site, we determine the position of<br />
upstream and downstream profile. Then we back-slip one profile relative to the other in 0.1m<br />
increments and calculate the elevation difference between both profiles. The amount of slip where<br />
the difference between both profiles has its minimum is considered the optimal displacement<br />
estimate. We measured offsets for channels identified by previous studies and utilized the<br />
spectacular resolution of the LiDAR data to find additional geomorphic features that were offset in<br />
1857 and prior earthquakes.<br />
Although this work is still in progress, preliminary results show relatively uniform slip of ~4.6m<br />
for the Cholame Segment. Inspection of offset gullies not previously identified along the Carrizo<br />
Segment suggest that the ramping (increase in slip from 3 to 9m) proposed by Sieh (1978) may not<br />
occur. In the Carrizo Plain, we found a number of gullies that were offset by only 4-6m, suggesting<br />
that the observed 9m offsets may be the result of more than one earthquake.<br />
2-045<br />
TECTONIC GEOMORPHOLOGY OF THE SAN ANDREAS FAULT ZONE FROM<br />
HIGH RESOLUTION TOPOGRAPHY: AN EXAMPLE FROM THE CHOLAME<br />
SEGMENT Arrowsmith JR, and Zielke O<br />
High resolution topographic data along fault zones are important aids in the delineation of recently<br />
active breaks. A 15 km-long portion of the south-central San Andreas Fault (SAF) along the<br />
southern Cholame segment preserves spectacular tectonic landforms such as benches, troughs,<br />
scarps, and aligned ridges that indicate recurring earthquake slip. Recently acquired LiDAR<br />
topographic data along the entire southern SAF (“B4” project) have shot densities of 3-4 m^2.<br />
Computed from the LiDAR returns, Digital Elevation Models (DEMs) of 0.25 to 0.5 m resolution<br />
using local binning with inverse distance weighting and 0.8 m or larger search radii depict the<br />
tectonic landforms at paleoseismic sites well enough to rate them confidently. Mapping of recently<br />
active breaks using a LiDAR-only based approach compares well with aerial photographic and<br />
field based methods. The fault zone varies in width from meters to nearly 1 km and is comprised of<br />
numerous en echelon meter to km-length overlapping sub parallel fault surfaces bounding<br />
differentially moving blocks elongate parallel to the SAF. The semantic variations of what<br />
constitutes “active” and the importance of secondary traces influence the breadth and complexity<br />
of the resulting fault trace maps.<br />
2-046<br />
THE SAN ANDREAS FAULT ZONE IN SAN GORGONIO PASS: A GEOLOGIC-<br />
FRAMEWORK PERSPECTIVE Matti JC<br />
The pioneering work of C.R. Allen (1957) in San G<strong>org</strong>onio Pass (SGP) demonstrated three points<br />
that have stood the test of time. First, a single throughgoing trace of the modern San Andreas Fault<br />
(SAF) cannot be mapped confidently through the Pass; second, the architecture of the SAF zone in<br />
the Pass is extraordinarily complex; third, any SAF rupture is likely to be complicated. For these<br />
162 | Southern California Earthquake Center