Annual Meeting - SCEC.org
Annual Meeting - SCEC.org
Annual Meeting - SCEC.org
- TAGS
- annual
- meeting
- www.scec.org
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Group 2 – Seismology | Poster Abstracts<br />
earthquakes on surrounding secondary faults to show that the earthquakes on the San Andreas<br />
Fault near Parkfield have a constant duration in this group with magnitudes ranging from 1.4 to<br />
3.7. In contrast, earthquakes on secondary faults indicate the more usual source parameter scaling<br />
suggestive of a constant stress drop, i.e. they have an increase in duration with magnitude. The<br />
earthquakes on the San Andreas Fault are located approximately 20 km to the northeast of the 1966<br />
mainshock epicenter, along the fault, to approximately 5 km south of the 2004 epicenter. Unlike<br />
previously studied repeating sequences, the magnitudes are not constant, nor is the repeat time<br />
regular. The secondary faults are located at distances of 5 km or greater from the trace of the San<br />
Andreas Fault, and are almost certainly not part of the active or historically active plate boundary<br />
fault system. The constant source duration observation for the earthquakes on the San Andreas<br />
Fault suggests that fault area stays constant over the magnitude range of our data set.<br />
A repetitive rupture of a small, locked asperity in a creeping fault can explain the constant<br />
duration. The dimension of the asperity could pre-determine the fault area. Therefore the<br />
observation directly measures the scale of the heterogeneities on the fault. We observe<br />
heterogeneities of 120, and 160 m in diameter.<br />
Calculated stress drop values of the earthquake population on the San Andreas Fault range from<br />
0.18 MPa to 63 MPa, and values on secondary faults range from 0.31 MPa to 14 MPa. The<br />
differences in duration between the events on the San Andreas Fault and on secondary faults<br />
suggest that earthquakes on the San Andreas Fault are inherently different. Cumulative slip values<br />
on the secondary faults are negligible in comparison to cumulative slip values on the San Andreas<br />
Fault. We speculate that faults with more cumulative displacement have earthquakes which may<br />
rupture differently. Furthermore, the differences in source properties between the two populations<br />
might be explained by differences in fault surface roughness.<br />
2-116<br />
SELF-SIMILARITY AND ITS BREAKDOWN OF RUPTURE GROWTH OF<br />
EARTHQUAKES IN PARKFIELD REGION Uchide T, and Ide S<br />
It is one of fundamental problems in earthquake seismology to understand the natures of rupture<br />
growth of earthquakes. The scaling of earthquakes source parameters provides clues to this<br />
problem. The similarities of eventual source parameters, such as fault length, width, displacement,<br />
stress drop, and rupture duration, are basically accepted [e.g., Kanamori and Anderson, 1975].<br />
However it is not confirmed whether the dynamic rupture of each earthquake grows self-similarly.<br />
In this study, we examine the self-similarity of the rupture growth by comparing the moment and<br />
moment rate functions of Mw 2.2 – 6.0 earthquakes in Parkfield region by slip inversion analyses<br />
using seismic data of GEOS operated by USGS and HRSN by the Berkeley Seismological<br />
Laboratory. Only the 2004 Parkfield earthquake (hereafter referred to as the Mw 6.0 event) is<br />
analyzed using the multiscale slip inversion method [Uchide and Ide, 2007].<br />
We discuss on normalized moment rate functions, where time and moment rate are normalized by<br />
a reference rupture time expected from an empirical self-similar scaling, To = 10^(– 5.43) Mo^(1/3),<br />
where Mo is the eventual seismic moment, and the average moment rate determined by Mo/To,<br />
respectively. Except the Mw 6.0 event, the normalized moment rate functions are similar; each has<br />
a peak around the half of rupture time, and the peak value is 2.0 – 3.5 times of the average moment<br />
rate. However the rupture growth process of the Mw 6.0 event is different from the others: the<br />
rupture time is more than twice of the reference one, and the normalized moment rate function has<br />
a gentler peak.<br />
2008 <strong>SCEC</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Meeting</strong> | 203