28.01.2013 Views

Annual Meeting - SCEC.org

Annual Meeting - SCEC.org

Annual Meeting - SCEC.org

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Poster Abstracts | Group 1 – GMP<br />

1-058<br />

GROUND MOTION SIMULATIONS OF SCENARIO EARTHQUAKE RUPTURES OF<br />

THE HAYWARD FAULT Aagaard B, Graves RW, Larsen S, Ma S, Rodgers A, Brocher T,<br />

Graymer RW, Harris RA, Lienkaemper J, Ponce DA, Schwartz D, Simpson R, Spudich P, Dreger<br />

D, Petersson A, and Boatwright J<br />

We compute ground motions in the San Francisco Bay area for a suite of 35 magnitude 6.7-7.2<br />

scenario earthquake ruptures involving the Hayward fault. The suite of scenarios encompasses<br />

variability in rupture length, hypocenter, distribution of slip, rupture speed, and rise time. The five<br />

rupture lengths include the Hayward fault and portions thereof, as well as combined rupture of the<br />

Hayward and Rodgers Creek faults and the Hayward and Calaveras faults. For most rupture<br />

lengths, we consider three hypocenters, yielding north-to-south rupture, bilateral rupture, and<br />

south-to-north rupture. We also consider multiple random realizations of the slip distribution,<br />

accounting for creeping patches (Funning et al., 2007) either through simple assumptions about<br />

how creep reduces coseismic slip or a slip-predictable approach. The kinematic rupture models<br />

include local variations in rupture speed and use a ray-tracing algorithm to propagate the rupture<br />

front. Although we are not attempting to simulate the 1868 Hayward fault earthquake in detail, a<br />

few of the scenarios are designed to have source parameters that might be similar to this event.<br />

This collaborative effort involves four modeling groups, using different wave propagation codes<br />

and domains of various sizes and resolutions, computing long-period (T > 1-2 s) or broadband (T ><br />

0.1 s) synthetic ground motions for overlapping subsets of the suite of scenarios. The simulations<br />

incorporate the 3-D geologic structure as described by the USGS 3-D Geologic Model (Jachens et<br />

al., 2006; Watt et al., 2007) and USGS Bay Area Velocity Model (Brocher et al., 2007). The<br />

simulations illustrate the dramatic increase in intensity of shaking for a magnitude 7.0 bilateral<br />

rupture of the entire Hayward fault compared with a magnitude 6.8 bilateral rupture of the<br />

southern two-thirds of the fault; the area subjected to shaking stronger than MMI VII increases<br />

from about 10% to more than 40% of the San Francisco Bay urban area. For a given rupture length,<br />

the synthetic ground motions exhibit the strongest sensitivity to the distribution of slip and<br />

proximity to sedimentary basins. The hypocenter also exerts a strong influence on the amplitude of<br />

the shaking due to rupture directivity. The synthetic waveforms exhibit a weaker sensitivity to the<br />

rupture speed and are relatively insensitive to the rise time.<br />

1-059<br />

FIELD-TESTING PRECARIOUSLY BALANCED ROCKS IN THE VICINITY OF SAN<br />

BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA: SEISMIC HAZARD RAMIFICATIONS Anooshehpoor R,<br />

Purvance MD, and Brune JN<br />

A number of faults exist in the immediate vicinity of San Bernardino which contribute substantially<br />

to the seismic hazard. These include the San Andreas, San Jacinto, Cleghorn, and Cucamonga faults<br />

among others. Groups of precariously balanced rocks (PBRs) exist in close proximity to many of<br />

these fault zones. In the absence of extensive near-source strong motion recordings over<br />

sufficiently long periods of time, we utilize these PBRs to constrain the ground motion amplitudes<br />

which have not been exceeded during the PBR residence times. Field tests have recently been<br />

conducted on seven PBRs near Lake Arrowhead, two PBRs near Silverwood Lake, and two PBRs<br />

south of Beaumont. These field tests consist of accurate determination of the PBR shapes using<br />

photogrammetry along with quasi-static tilting tests of a subgroup of these PBRs to determine<br />

accurate restoring force versus tilt curves. This information is vital for accurate PBR fragility<br />

determination. As outlined in Rood et al. (2008), recent Be-10 cosmogenic age dates are consistent<br />

with the PBRs having been exhumed no more recently than 16-23 ka which are broadly consistent<br />

with VML minimum surface exposure ages on granite corestones in Southern California. These age<br />

100 | Southern California Earthquake Center

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!