Annual Meeting - SCEC.org
Annual Meeting - SCEC.org
Annual Meeting - SCEC.org
- TAGS
- annual
- meeting
- www.scec.org
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Poster Abstracts | Group 1 – GMP<br />
1-058<br />
GROUND MOTION SIMULATIONS OF SCENARIO EARTHQUAKE RUPTURES OF<br />
THE HAYWARD FAULT Aagaard B, Graves RW, Larsen S, Ma S, Rodgers A, Brocher T,<br />
Graymer RW, Harris RA, Lienkaemper J, Ponce DA, Schwartz D, Simpson R, Spudich P, Dreger<br />
D, Petersson A, and Boatwright J<br />
We compute ground motions in the San Francisco Bay area for a suite of 35 magnitude 6.7-7.2<br />
scenario earthquake ruptures involving the Hayward fault. The suite of scenarios encompasses<br />
variability in rupture length, hypocenter, distribution of slip, rupture speed, and rise time. The five<br />
rupture lengths include the Hayward fault and portions thereof, as well as combined rupture of the<br />
Hayward and Rodgers Creek faults and the Hayward and Calaveras faults. For most rupture<br />
lengths, we consider three hypocenters, yielding north-to-south rupture, bilateral rupture, and<br />
south-to-north rupture. We also consider multiple random realizations of the slip distribution,<br />
accounting for creeping patches (Funning et al., 2007) either through simple assumptions about<br />
how creep reduces coseismic slip or a slip-predictable approach. The kinematic rupture models<br />
include local variations in rupture speed and use a ray-tracing algorithm to propagate the rupture<br />
front. Although we are not attempting to simulate the 1868 Hayward fault earthquake in detail, a<br />
few of the scenarios are designed to have source parameters that might be similar to this event.<br />
This collaborative effort involves four modeling groups, using different wave propagation codes<br />
and domains of various sizes and resolutions, computing long-period (T > 1-2 s) or broadband (T ><br />
0.1 s) synthetic ground motions for overlapping subsets of the suite of scenarios. The simulations<br />
incorporate the 3-D geologic structure as described by the USGS 3-D Geologic Model (Jachens et<br />
al., 2006; Watt et al., 2007) and USGS Bay Area Velocity Model (Brocher et al., 2007). The<br />
simulations illustrate the dramatic increase in intensity of shaking for a magnitude 7.0 bilateral<br />
rupture of the entire Hayward fault compared with a magnitude 6.8 bilateral rupture of the<br />
southern two-thirds of the fault; the area subjected to shaking stronger than MMI VII increases<br />
from about 10% to more than 40% of the San Francisco Bay urban area. For a given rupture length,<br />
the synthetic ground motions exhibit the strongest sensitivity to the distribution of slip and<br />
proximity to sedimentary basins. The hypocenter also exerts a strong influence on the amplitude of<br />
the shaking due to rupture directivity. The synthetic waveforms exhibit a weaker sensitivity to the<br />
rupture speed and are relatively insensitive to the rise time.<br />
1-059<br />
FIELD-TESTING PRECARIOUSLY BALANCED ROCKS IN THE VICINITY OF SAN<br />
BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA: SEISMIC HAZARD RAMIFICATIONS Anooshehpoor R,<br />
Purvance MD, and Brune JN<br />
A number of faults exist in the immediate vicinity of San Bernardino which contribute substantially<br />
to the seismic hazard. These include the San Andreas, San Jacinto, Cleghorn, and Cucamonga faults<br />
among others. Groups of precariously balanced rocks (PBRs) exist in close proximity to many of<br />
these fault zones. In the absence of extensive near-source strong motion recordings over<br />
sufficiently long periods of time, we utilize these PBRs to constrain the ground motion amplitudes<br />
which have not been exceeded during the PBR residence times. Field tests have recently been<br />
conducted on seven PBRs near Lake Arrowhead, two PBRs near Silverwood Lake, and two PBRs<br />
south of Beaumont. These field tests consist of accurate determination of the PBR shapes using<br />
photogrammetry along with quasi-static tilting tests of a subgroup of these PBRs to determine<br />
accurate restoring force versus tilt curves. This information is vital for accurate PBR fragility<br />
determination. As outlined in Rood et al. (2008), recent Be-10 cosmogenic age dates are consistent<br />
with the PBRs having been exhumed no more recently than 16-23 ka which are broadly consistent<br />
with VML minimum surface exposure ages on granite corestones in Southern California. These age<br />
100 | Southern California Earthquake Center