28.01.2013 Views

Annual Meeting - SCEC.org

Annual Meeting - SCEC.org

Annual Meeting - SCEC.org

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Group 1 – EFP | Poster Abstracts<br />

reference model, we use the Pattern Informatics (PI) method (Tiampo et al., 2002) which identifies<br />

areas of increase and decrease in the seismicity rate for days to months after the earthquake event.<br />

Of particular increase are the areas of seismic quiescence, which are related to “stress shadows”<br />

often calculated using Coulomb stress changes (Stein, 1992; Stein, 1999; Tiampo et al., 2006). We<br />

will use slip models of the Landers earthquake to calculate the Coulomb stress changes (Lin and<br />

Stein, 2004; Toda et al., 2005), and manipulate the constitutive parameters in order to recreate a<br />

stress field comparable to that of the reference model. These parameters include the calculation<br />

depth, the coefficient of friction, and most importantly the principal stress orientations. Currently,<br />

we assume a uniform stress field, but further studies will introduce the complication of<br />

heterogeneities which might improve the scale and detail of the resulting models. Determining the<br />

stress field can improve earthquake modeling, and thus advance our understanding of the<br />

principal mechanics involved with them.<br />

1-101<br />

QUANTIFYING LONG AND SHORT-RANGE EARTHQUAKE TRIGGERING AS A<br />

FUNCTION OF DYNAMIC STRAIN van der Elst NJ, and Brodsky EE<br />

Remote earthquake triggering by dynamic strain from seismic waves is a regularly observed<br />

feature of earthquake interactions. However, the effectiveness of dynamic strains at triggering<br />

earthquakes has not been well quantified. Do dynamically triggered earthquakes make up a large<br />

proportion of earthquakes as a whole? Here we quantify the rate at which dynamic strains trigger<br />

earthquakes at long distances, using the ANSS and JMA earthquake catalogs, and compare pre-and<br />

post-trigger interevent time statistics. We find that the intensity of dynamic triggering scales<br />

continuously as a function of peak dynamic strain, estimated from the seismic wave amplitude. We<br />

compare these rates to aftershock triggering rates very near a mainshock, and find that dynamic<br />

triggering can account for the majority of local aftershocks. Dynamic triggering also appears to be<br />

ubiquitous -- not confined to geothermal and magmatic provinces. Some regions however, like<br />

California, are more prone to triggering than others, like Japan. This result points the way to a new<br />

methodology for earthquake forecasting based on the amplitude of the observed seismic waves.<br />

1-102<br />

EVIDENCE FOR MOGI DOUGHNUT BEHAVIOR IN SEISMICITY PRECEDING<br />

SMALL EARTHQUAKES IN SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA Shearer PM, and Lin G<br />

We examine the average space-time behavior of seismicity preceding M 2–5 earthquakes in<br />

southern California from 1981 to 2007 using a high-resolution catalog and identify regions of<br />

enhanced activity in a 1-day period preceding larger earthquakes at distances comparable to their<br />

predicted source radii. The difference in precursory behavior between large and small earthquakes<br />

is subtle but statistically significant when averaged over many earthquakes, and has similarities to<br />

the “Mogi doughnut” seismicity pattern observed to occur prior to some M 6 and larger<br />

earthquakes. These results indicate that many standard earthquake triggering models do not<br />

account for all of the processes involved in earthquake occurrence.<br />

2008 <strong>SCEC</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Meeting</strong> | 121

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!