Annual Meeting - SCEC.org
Annual Meeting - SCEC.org
Annual Meeting - SCEC.org
- TAGS
- annual
- meeting
- www.scec.org
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Group 1 – EFP | Poster Abstracts<br />
reference model, we use the Pattern Informatics (PI) method (Tiampo et al., 2002) which identifies<br />
areas of increase and decrease in the seismicity rate for days to months after the earthquake event.<br />
Of particular increase are the areas of seismic quiescence, which are related to “stress shadows”<br />
often calculated using Coulomb stress changes (Stein, 1992; Stein, 1999; Tiampo et al., 2006). We<br />
will use slip models of the Landers earthquake to calculate the Coulomb stress changes (Lin and<br />
Stein, 2004; Toda et al., 2005), and manipulate the constitutive parameters in order to recreate a<br />
stress field comparable to that of the reference model. These parameters include the calculation<br />
depth, the coefficient of friction, and most importantly the principal stress orientations. Currently,<br />
we assume a uniform stress field, but further studies will introduce the complication of<br />
heterogeneities which might improve the scale and detail of the resulting models. Determining the<br />
stress field can improve earthquake modeling, and thus advance our understanding of the<br />
principal mechanics involved with them.<br />
1-101<br />
QUANTIFYING LONG AND SHORT-RANGE EARTHQUAKE TRIGGERING AS A<br />
FUNCTION OF DYNAMIC STRAIN van der Elst NJ, and Brodsky EE<br />
Remote earthquake triggering by dynamic strain from seismic waves is a regularly observed<br />
feature of earthquake interactions. However, the effectiveness of dynamic strains at triggering<br />
earthquakes has not been well quantified. Do dynamically triggered earthquakes make up a large<br />
proportion of earthquakes as a whole? Here we quantify the rate at which dynamic strains trigger<br />
earthquakes at long distances, using the ANSS and JMA earthquake catalogs, and compare pre-and<br />
post-trigger interevent time statistics. We find that the intensity of dynamic triggering scales<br />
continuously as a function of peak dynamic strain, estimated from the seismic wave amplitude. We<br />
compare these rates to aftershock triggering rates very near a mainshock, and find that dynamic<br />
triggering can account for the majority of local aftershocks. Dynamic triggering also appears to be<br />
ubiquitous -- not confined to geothermal and magmatic provinces. Some regions however, like<br />
California, are more prone to triggering than others, like Japan. This result points the way to a new<br />
methodology for earthquake forecasting based on the amplitude of the observed seismic waves.<br />
1-102<br />
EVIDENCE FOR MOGI DOUGHNUT BEHAVIOR IN SEISMICITY PRECEDING<br />
SMALL EARTHQUAKES IN SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA Shearer PM, and Lin G<br />
We examine the average space-time behavior of seismicity preceding M 2–5 earthquakes in<br />
southern California from 1981 to 2007 using a high-resolution catalog and identify regions of<br />
enhanced activity in a 1-day period preceding larger earthquakes at distances comparable to their<br />
predicted source radii. The difference in precursory behavior between large and small earthquakes<br />
is subtle but statistically significant when averaged over many earthquakes, and has similarities to<br />
the “Mogi doughnut” seismicity pattern observed to occur prior to some M 6 and larger<br />
earthquakes. These results indicate that many standard earthquake triggering models do not<br />
account for all of the processes involved in earthquake occurrence.<br />
2008 <strong>SCEC</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Meeting</strong> | 121