Annual Meeting - SCEC.org
Annual Meeting - SCEC.org
Annual Meeting - SCEC.org
- TAGS
- annual
- meeting
- www.scec.org
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Group 1 – CSEP | Poster Abstracts<br />
relative shear displacement of each fault node. The fault nodes are tested for contact with the<br />
opposite fault member at each time step. This DEM model does not suffer from numerical<br />
instability when discontinuities occur (e.g., instantaneous friction changes, fault separation, etc.).<br />
Thus arbitrary friction laws and fault surface roughness' can be incorporated.<br />
A smooth fault is used to emulate AEA08; the DEM model incorporates the AEA08 material<br />
properties and surface topography. The initial stress state is obtained by displacing the nodal<br />
positions and cycling the damped model to quiescence. Initial investigations used linear time<br />
weakening friction following AEA08. The DEM model produces ground motions for the maximum<br />
slip event at the repository location which are very similar to AEA08 motions. An instantaneous<br />
friction law which drops from static to dynamic value in one time step very slightly increases the<br />
rupture velocity and yields nearly identical ground motions. Fault separation occurs locally near<br />
the free surface for very short time periods. AEA08 results for the “smooth” supershear and<br />
subshear 2.7 m slip cases compare favorably with the DEM ground motions with and without time<br />
weakening. These results indicate that beyond modulating the rupture velocity, frictional<br />
weakening is not a necessary component of dynamic rupture simulations utilizing DEM. These<br />
results strongly suggest that the physical significance of the so-called critical slip weakening<br />
distance must be scrutinized.<br />
1-071<br />
OBSERVED RELATIONS AMONG FAULT STRENGTH LOSS, STRESS DROP, SLIP<br />
VELOCITY, AND NEAR-FAULT PARTICLE VELOCITY DURING DYNAMIC<br />
RUPTURE PROPAGATION, AND THEIR IMPLICATIONS FOR LIMITS ON GROUND<br />
MOTION Beeler N, Kilgore BD, Boettcher M, McGarr A, Fletcher J, Evans J, and Baker S<br />
Extreme ground motions implied by the PSHA at Yucca Mountain at low exceedance probability<br />
require earthquake stress drop to approach the in situ shear stress. Lab rupture propagation<br />
experiments and seismic studies are not generally consistent with this requirement; static stress<br />
drops are