28.01.2013 Views

Annual Meeting - SCEC.org

Annual Meeting - SCEC.org

Annual Meeting - SCEC.org

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Group 2 – Earthquake Geology | Poster Abstracts<br />

Newberry Springs, California ~30 km east of Barstow. The trenches exposed fluvial, lacustrine, and<br />

playa sediments, consisting of pebble gravel and coarse-grained sands, silts, and clays. Although<br />

motion on two parallel fault strands that cross the site appears to be predominantly strike-slip,<br />

secondary components of vertical movement have created a down-dropped block between them.<br />

Twelve optically stimulated luminescence dates bracket surface rupture ages. The three most<br />

recent surface ruptures corroborate the pattern of earthquake clustering originally proposed in the<br />

Eastern California Shear Zone (ECSZ) by Rockwell et al. (2000). Specifically, the most recent event<br />

occurred during latest Holocene time between 0.6 to 1.1 ka and 2.0 ka. This age suggests that the<br />

Calico fault has ruptured as part of the ongoing latest Holocene cluster. The penultimate and antepenultimate<br />

surface ruptures both occurred during a brief interval between 5-6 ka (event 2 [5.0-5.6<br />

ka] and event 3 [5.6 to 6.1 ka or possibly 7.3ka]). Both of these ruptures fall within the penultimate<br />

seismic cluster on the ECSZ. One possible explanation for two earthquakes within the same cluster<br />

could be that the Calico fault slips ~2x faster than nearby dextral faults (Oskin et al., 2008). This<br />

higher slip rate may be accommodated via multiple ruptures during clustering time periods.<br />

Alternatively, the study site may be an overlap zone between northern and southern Calico<br />

ruptures. The 1.5m vertical separation associated with event 3 is much larger than separation in<br />

event 2. This suggests that event 3 exhibited larger displacement at the trench site. Evidence for a<br />

possible fourth event between 6.1 to 7.3ka and 8.4ka is also present in our southern trench.<br />

However, the age is not well defined. The absence of evidence for earthquakes between 2-5 ka falls<br />

within the seismic lull on the ECSZ found by Rockwell et al. (2000) – a time period when<br />

paleoseismic evidence suggests a cluster of activity in the network of faults beneath the Los<br />

Angeles region and central Transverse Ranges (Dolan et al., 2007).<br />

2-041<br />

RECENT OFFSET MEASUREMENTS, COACHELLA VALLEY SEGMENT, SAN<br />

ANDREAS FAULT Williams PL, Hudnut KW, and Seitz GG<br />

The Coachella Valley Segment (CVS) of the southern San Andreas fault (SSAF) has not ruptured in<br />

a large or great earthquake during the past ~330 years (Sieh and Williams, 1990). Given that<br />

recurrence intervals of ~200 years have been found for the CVS (Fumal et al., 2002; Williams and<br />

Seitz, 2007; Philibosian et al., 2007), the long quiescence points to a particularly high seismic hazard<br />

(e.g. WGCEP, 2008). This paper presents detailed geomorphic slip-per-event evidence for the<br />

southern 50 km of the CVS. A sufficient sample of the fault's past behavior should indicate what to<br />

expect from future earthquakes. Detailed descriptions of channel offsets are presented for 65<br />

independent sites, some of these preserve evidence of multiple offset events. Compilation of the<br />

survey indicates that the latest five earthquakes produced moderate, 3±1 meter offsets, with<br />

cumulative displacement of 15-17 meters. Interpreted in the context of the paleoseismic data<br />

referenced above, these data suggest a CVS slip rate of 16±1mm/yr. The data reported here were<br />

initially developed by use of aerial reconnaissance and field mapping, and were subsequently<br />

checked, refined and extended utilizing Lidar data obtained from the NCALM B4 project. Several<br />

independent features in the range of 6-25 meters were discovered during examination of the Lidar<br />

dataset, and in many cases the Lidar substantially improved assessment of fault location and<br />

confirmed the sizes of larger offsets.<br />

2-042<br />

AN UPDATE ON ACCESS TO GEOEARTHSCOPE LIDAR TOPOGRAPHY DATA<br />

Crosby CJ, Nandigam V, Arrowsmith JR, Balakrishnan S, Baru C, and Phillips DA<br />

The recently completed GeoEarthScope airborne LiDAR (Light Detection And Ranging)<br />

topography acquisition will provide unprecedented data adjacent to active faults throughout the<br />

plate boundary region of western North America. Totaling more than 5000 square kilometers, these<br />

2008 <strong>SCEC</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Meeting</strong> | 159

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!