28.01.2013 Views

Annual Meeting - SCEC.org

Annual Meeting - SCEC.org

Annual Meeting - SCEC.org

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Group 2 – FARM | Poster Abstracts<br />

unconditional uniform averaging (the averaging applied at each grid point of the fault), four<br />

single-point criterion averaging (the averaging applied at a grid point if certain criteria at that point<br />

are met), and four 9-point criterion averaging (the averaging applied at a grid point if certain<br />

criteria at that point and 8 neighboring grid points are met).<br />

The selected best smoothing algorithm was then tested for convergence for two distinct physical<br />

rupture propagation configurations.<br />

The improved algorithm for the numerical modeling of rupture propagation has been<br />

implemented in the 3D causal hybrid viscoelastic FD-FE method and computer code for the<br />

numerical modeling of rupture and wave propagation.<br />

2-065<br />

RUPTURE PROPAGATION ACROSS FAULTS WITH LINKED STEPOVERS: A<br />

GEOMETRICAL PARAMETER STUDY Lozos JC, Oglesby DD, and Duan B<br />

Segmented faults with stepovers are ubiquitous, and occur at a variety of scales, ranging from<br />

small stepovers on the San Jacinto Fault to the large-scale stepover on the San Andreas Fault<br />

between Tejon Pass and San G<strong>org</strong>onio Pass. Because this type of fault geometry is so prevalent,<br />

understanding how earthquake rupture propagates through such systems is important for<br />

evaluating seismic hazard. In the present study, we systematically investigate how far rupture will<br />

propagate through a fault with a linked (i.e., continuous fault) stepover, based on the length of the<br />

linking fault segment and the angle that connects the linking segment to adjacent segments.<br />

We conducted dynamic models of such systems using the two-dimensional finite element method<br />

(Duan and Oglesby 2007). The fault system in our models consists of three segments: two parallel<br />

10km-long faults linked at a specified angle by a linking segment of 500m, 1km, 2km, or 3km. This<br />

geometry was modeled both as a extensional system and a compressional system depending on the<br />

direction of shear.<br />

We observed several distinct rupture behaviors, with systematic differences between<br />

compressional and extensional cases. Both shear directions rupture straight through the stepover<br />

for very shallow stepover angles. In compressional systems with steeper angles, rupture may jump<br />

ahead from the linking segment onto the far segment; whether or not rupture on this segment<br />

reaches critical patch size and slips fully is also a function of angle and stepover length. In some<br />

compressional cases, if the angle is steep enough and the stepover short enough, rupture may jump<br />

over the step entirely and propagate down the far segment without touching the linking segment.<br />

In extensional systems, rupture jumps from the nucleating segment onto the linking segment at<br />

shallow angles, but at steeper angles, rupture propagates through without jumping. Rupture<br />

propagates through a wider range of angles in extensional cases. In both extensional and<br />

compressional cases, for each stepover length there exists a maximum angle through which rupture<br />

can fully propagate; this maximum angle decreases asymptotically to a minimum value as the<br />

stepover length increases.<br />

2-066<br />

A FINITE DIFFERENCE METHOD FOR IRREGULAR GEOMETRIES: APPLICATION<br />

TO DYNAMIC RUPTURE ON ROUGH FAULTS Belanger D, and Dunham EM<br />

We have developed a finite difference method to solve dynamic rupture problems in irregular<br />

geometries. Our objective is to connect properties of high frequency radiation produced during slip<br />

on rough faults to statistical measures of fault roughness. To handle irregular geometries, we<br />

2008 <strong>SCEC</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Meeting</strong> | 175

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!