Annual Meeting - SCEC.org
Annual Meeting - SCEC.org
Annual Meeting - SCEC.org
- TAGS
- annual
- meeting
- www.scec.org
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Group 1 – CSEP | Poster Abstracts<br />
of giant earthquakes. However, there is a growing set of high-quality broadband teleseismic<br />
recordings of large and giant earthquakes. In this poster, we use recordings from the 2003 Tokachioki<br />
(Mw 8.3) earthquake as empirical Green’s functions to simulate the rock and soil ground<br />
motions from the scenario M w 9.2 subduction earthquake expected on Cascadia subduction zone<br />
in the frequency band of interest to flexible and large-scale buildings (0.1 to 1 Hz). The effect of<br />
amplification by the Seattle basin is considered as a Green function which is derived from<br />
deconvolving the teleseismic waves recorded at rock sites from soil sites at SHIP02 experiment.<br />
These strong ground motions are used to simulate the fully nonlinear seismic responses of 20-story<br />
and 6-story steel moment-frame buildings designed according to both the U.S. 1994 UBC and also<br />
Japanese building code published in 1987. We consider several realizations of the hypothetical<br />
subduction earthquake; the down-dip limit of rupture is of paticular importance to the simulated<br />
ground motions in Seattle. If slip is assumed to be limited to offshore regions, then the building<br />
simulations indicate that the building responses are mostly in the linear rang. However, our<br />
simulation shows that buildings with brittle welds would collapse for rupture models where<br />
rupture extends beneath the Olympic Mountains.. The ground motions have very long durations<br />
(more than 4 minutes), and our building simulations should be considered as a minimum estimate<br />
since we have used a very simple model of degradation of the structure.<br />
1-068<br />
DYNAMIC RUPTURE THROUGH A BRANCHED FAULT CONFIGURATION WITH<br />
OFF-FAULT INELASTIC RESPONSE Templeton EL, Bhat HS, Dmowska R, and Rice JR<br />
We analyze the propagation of shear cracks along branched fault paths with off-fault elastic-plastic<br />
deformation. Numerical and experimental investigations have focused on both the role of off-fault<br />
material behavior and that of geometrical complexities during earthquake rupture. Recent studies<br />
of earthquake dynamics have allowed for off-fault inelastic deformation [Andrews, 2005,2007; Shi<br />
and Ben-Zion, 2006; Templeton and Rice, 2008; Viesca et al., 2008; Duan, 2008]. These studies use<br />
pressure-dependent yield criteria such as Mohr-Coulomb or Drucker-Prager (DP), which are<br />
simple models for describing the onset of plastic deformation in granular or cracked materials. We<br />
use the dynamic finite element method to extend previous branching studies to include effects of<br />
inelastic off-fault response during dynamic slip-weakening earthquake rupture with an elastic DP<br />
plastic off-fault material description.<br />
We outline current understanding of the dynamics of rupture along branched fault systems, as<br />
supported by field and laboratory comparisons with modeling, and then address rupture through<br />
faults bordered by damage zones which have inelastic response during dynamic rupture. Previous<br />
numerical studies by others in our group [Poliakov et al., 2002; Kame et al., 2003; Bhat et al.,<br />
2004,2007; Fliss et al., 2005] based on boundary integral equation implementations of slipweakening<br />
rupture showed how the choice of rupture path at a branching junction is determined<br />
by the orientation of maximum compressive stress, branch angle, and rupture velocity at the<br />
junction. We show how off-fault inelastic deformation contributes to the dynamic path selection<br />
process.<br />
In particular, we address the possibility of rupture through a fault branch along the Solitario<br />
Canyon Fault (SCF) bordering Yucca Mountain. An issue is whether the next seismic rupture along<br />
SCF could also induce rupture along a nearby fault such as the Windy Wash Fault or the<br />
Boomerang Fault. Analyses using branch configurations suggested by cross-sectional views<br />
[Brocher et al., 2998; Potter et al., 1999,2004] with a vertical tectonic pre-stress suggest that<br />
branching is unlikely for these configurations when inelastic deformation is allowed in the bulk<br />
except in cases of extreme stress drops or super shear rupture velocities. We also address the<br />
2008 <strong>SCEC</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Meeting</strong> | 105