28.01.2013 Views

Annual Meeting - SCEC.org

Annual Meeting - SCEC.org

Annual Meeting - SCEC.org

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Abstracts | Plenary Presentations<br />

earthquake processes and impacts might yield a greater ability to prepare for such an event and<br />

mitigate its negative effects. Questions with potentially 1st-order impacts on scenario impacts<br />

include: more detailed knowledge of the relative activity and geometry of various traces of the<br />

Southern San Andreas fault system; continued advances to a the community velocity model; a<br />

regional, detailed liquefaction model; various enhancements to our model of fire following<br />

earthquake; detailed knowledge of the building stock and the likely behavior of the older concrete,<br />

steel, and woodframe buildings that contribute so heavily to life-safety risk; a public loss model<br />

that employs dynamic structural analysis and other concepts of modern performance-based<br />

earthquake engineering; an up-to-date, dynamic model of seismic lifeline damage and interaction;<br />

a mechanistic model of human injuries in earthquake-damaged buildings; and a mechanistic model<br />

of cost increases in catastrophic earthquakes.<br />

MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 8, 2008 – 09:30<br />

USING THE SHAKEOUT SCENARIO: A PRACTITIONER'S PERSPECTIVE<br />

Tognazzini RA<br />

The purpose of this presentation is to describe how the Los Angeles City Department of Water and<br />

Power (LADWP) used the ShakeOut Scenario over the first six months of this year, culminating in<br />

a full-scale exercise on July 16 and 17, 2008. The presentation will cover the motivation behind the<br />

adoption of the ShakeOut Scenario, the opportunities that it offered, the training that resulted in<br />

the full-scale exercise, and the results that were realized in the Nation’s largest municipally owned<br />

utility. The presentation will also provide information that indicates LADWP’s need to improve its<br />

infrastructure, emergency management procedures, and emergency response resources to prevent<br />

the ShakeOut Scenario from being a catastrophic event for the City of Los Angeles.<br />

Scenario motivations included products from <strong>SCEC</strong> and its affiliates, mandates from regulatory<br />

agencies, a recent major disaster, and several minor emergencies. The opportunity to use an<br />

earthquake scenario that exercised all elements of the new emergency response procedures came<br />

from the mandatory development of new emergency response plans in 2007, and the need to train<br />

to the new plans, starting in 2008. The unstated goal of the full-scale exercise was to conduct the<br />

largest and most complex demonstration of emergency management that LADWP has ever<br />

undertaken in its 106-year history. The model adopted for this full-scale exercise was a series of<br />

orientation and training exercises leading up to the full-scale exercise in July. This model has been<br />

adopted by several other utilities in Southern California in preparation for the State’s Golden<br />

Guardian Exercise in November 2008.<br />

The results were that LADWP experienced an abnormally large number of customer-service outage<br />

hours for its Power System, and lost a large amount of its aboveground water storage to fire<br />

fighting for the Water System. For this ShakeOut Scenario to avoid becoming a catastrophe, nearly<br />

4,000,000 people in the City of Los Angeles were required to curtail the use of both water and<br />

power in unprecedented amounts for long periods.<br />

MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 8, 2008 – 15:30<br />

ENGINEERING USE OF GROUND MOTIONS: CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES<br />

Baker JW<br />

Ground motions, and measures of ground motion intensity, serve as a link between seismology<br />

and engineering for the purpose of earthquake risk assessment and performance-based earthquake<br />

engineering. Engineers rely on earth scientists to quantify rates of earthquake activity and<br />

associated ground shaking intensity at a site, and increasingly to provide simulated ground motion<br />

time histories. As nonlinear dynamic structural analysis becomes increasingly common in<br />

66 | Southern California Earthquake Center

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!