Annual Meeting - SCEC.org
Annual Meeting - SCEC.org
Annual Meeting - SCEC.org
- TAGS
- annual
- meeting
- www.scec.org
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Poster Abstracts | Group 2 – FARM<br />
transform the governing equations from a non-Cartesian coordinate system that conforms to the<br />
irregular boundaries of the physical domain to a Cartesian coordinate system in a rectangular<br />
computational domain, and solve the equations in the computational domain.<br />
To accurately capture the high frequency wavefield, we use a method that produces far smaller<br />
numerical oscillations than those plaguing conventional finite difference/element methods. The<br />
governing equations (momentum conservation and Hooke’s law) are written as a system of firstorder<br />
equations for velocity and stress, which are defined at a common set of grid points and time<br />
steps (i.e., there is no staggering in space or time). Time stepping is done using an explicit thirdorder<br />
Runge-Kutta method. The equations are hyperbolic and the fields can be decomposed into a<br />
set of waves (with associated wave speeds) propagating in each coordinate direction. Spatial<br />
derivatives are computed with fifth-order WENO (weighted essentially non-oscillatory) finite<br />
differences in the upwind direction associated with each wave [Jiang and Shu, J. Comp. Phys.,<br />
126(1), 202-228, 1996]. Rather than using data from a single stencil (i.e., set of grid points) to<br />
calculate the derivative, a weighted combination of data from several candidate stencils is used.<br />
The weights are assigned based on solution smoothness within each stencil, and stencils in which<br />
the solution exhibits excessive variations are given minimal weight. Consequently, numerical<br />
oscillations are suppressed, even in the vicinity of the rupture front and at wavefronts.<br />
Boundary conditions are implemented by again appealing to the hyperbolic nature of the<br />
governing equations. At each point on a boundary (or fault), the solution is decomposed into a set<br />
of waves propagating into and out of the boundary. The amplitudes of incoming waves are<br />
preserved, while those of outgoing waves are modified to satisfy the boundary conditions. On the<br />
fault, this amounts to solving the friction law together with an equation expressing shear stress as<br />
the sum of a load, the radiation damping response, and the stress change carried by the incoming<br />
waves.<br />
2-067<br />
EARTHQUAKE RUPTURES WITH THERMAL WEAKENING AND THE OPERATION<br />
OF FAULTS AT LOW OVERALL STRESS LEVELS Dunham EM, Noda H, and Rice JR<br />
We have conducted rupture propagation simulations incorporating flash heating of microscopic<br />
asperity contacts and thermal pressurization of pore fluid [Noda, Dunham, and Rice, in<br />
preparation, 2007-08]. These are arguably the primary weakening mechanisms at coseismic slip<br />
rates, at least prior to large slip accumulation. Ruptures on strongly rate-weakening faults take the<br />
form of slip pulses or cracks, depending on the background stress level. Self-sustaining slip pulses<br />
exist only within a narrow range of stresses; below this range, artificially nucleated ruptures arrest,<br />
and above this range, ruptures are crack-like. Certain features of our simulations lend support to<br />
the idea that faults operate at the minimum critical level required for propagation, such that<br />
natural earthquakes take the form of slip pulses.<br />
Using flash heating parameters measured in recent laboratory experiments, the critical range<br />
occurs when the ratio of shear to effective normal stress on the fault is 0.2-0.3 (a range that is only<br />
mildly influenced by the choice of thermal pressurization parameters, at least within a reasonable<br />
range of uncertainty around laboratory-measured values). This level is consistent with the low<br />
stress inferred to be acting on the San Andreas fault (SAF); a ratio of shear to effective normal stress<br />
of 0.24 was measured at 2.1 km depth in the SAFOD pilot hole [Hickman and Zoback, 2004],<br />
adding further support to other measurements indicating that the maximum horizontal<br />
compressive stress is nearly perpendicular to the SAF. While the overall background stress level is<br />
176 | Southern California Earthquake Center