28.01.2013 Views

Annual Meeting - SCEC.org

Annual Meeting - SCEC.org

Annual Meeting - SCEC.org

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Poster Abstracts | Group 2 – USR<br />

Group 2. Poster Abstracts<br />

Plaza Ballroom, Hilton Palm Springs Resort<br />

Unified Structural Representation (USR)<br />

2-001<br />

<strong>SCEC</strong> COMMUNITY VELOCITY MODEL (CVM-H 5.5) Plesch A, Shaw JH, Hauksson E,<br />

and Tanimoto T<br />

We present a new version of the <strong>SCEC</strong> Community Velocity Model (CVM-H version 5.5) that<br />

incorporates several enhancements to better facilitate its use in strong ground motion prediction<br />

and seismic hazards assessment. These improvements include updates to the background models,<br />

basin structures, geotechnical layer, and the code that delivers the CVM-H. The extent of the model<br />

was expanded to an area between longitudes 120d52'20"W and 113d19'16"W and latitudes<br />

30d56'49"N and 36d37'17"N to accommodate larger numerical experiments.<br />

Improvements to the basin structures include new Vp, Vs, and density parameterizations within<br />

the Santa Maria and Ventura basins that are based on direct velocity measurements from<br />

petroleum well logs and seismic reflection data. These new basin structures were used as input for<br />

the development new P and S wave tomographic velocity models, and a new upper mantle<br />

teleseismic and surface wave model. The CVM-H thus consists of the revised basin representations<br />

embedded in self-consistent regional crust and upper mantle models. In addition, we also<br />

enhanced the geotechnical layer (GTL) representation. The GTL in the major sedimentary basins<br />

remains unchanged, following the approach of the <strong>SCEC</strong> CVM 4.0 (Magistrale et al., 2000). In<br />

bedrock sites, however, we implemented a new GTL based on the depth-velocity relations of Boore<br />

& Joyner (1997). In this implementation, we used the empirical velocity gradient from Boore &<br />

Joyner (1997) to scale upwards from the base of the GTL (top of basement). This bedrock GTL<br />

implementation results in gradual velocity gradients and variable velocities at the surface.<br />

In addition, we provide a series of enhancements to the C-code that delivers the CVM-H. This code<br />

specifies Vp, Vs, and density values at arbitrary points (x,y,z) defined by the user by locating the<br />

nearest neighbor grid point in the appropriate CVM-H voxet. The new model version consists of<br />

high (250m) and medium (1000m) resolutions voxets, or regular grids, defining both Vp and Vs<br />

structure (density is derived using a scaling relationship from Vp). To support the needs of <strong>SCEC</strong><br />

scientists who employ the code to help parameterize their computational grids, we enhanced the<br />

code to deliver several additional functions. First, the code now provides the location, in addition<br />

to the value, of the nearest neighbor grid point. This allows users to identify the locations where<br />

the values were initially parameterized in the CVM-H, ensuring data integrity and supporting the<br />

use of a variety of interpolation schemes that can be tailored to the users application. A sample<br />

implementation of an interpolation routine which handles material boundaries correctly is<br />

provided. Second, the code now provides the depths (distances) from the arbitrary points to the<br />

surfaces used to construct the CVM-H, namely the surface topography/bathymetry, the top of<br />

crystalline basement, and the Moho. This information is of particular value when using the CVM-H<br />

to guide the construction of computational meshes.<br />

142 | Southern California Earthquake Center

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!