28.01.2013 Views

Annual Meeting - SCEC.org

Annual Meeting - SCEC.org

Annual Meeting - SCEC.org

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Group 2 – FARM | Poster Abstracts<br />

quite small, stresses concentrated at the rupture front are consistent with typical static (and low<br />

velocity) friction coefficients of 0.6-0.9; this stress concentration is required to initiate slip.<br />

Growing slip pulses have stress drops close to 3 MPa and feature slip increasing with propagation<br />

distance at a rate of about 0.14 m/km. These values are consistent with seismic inferences of stress<br />

drop and field constraints on slip-length scaling. On the other hand, cracks have stress drops of<br />

over 20 MPa, and slip at the hypocenter increases with propagation distance at a rate of about 1<br />

m/km.<br />

2-068<br />

STATISTICS OF EARTHQUAKE STRESS DROPS FOR EVOLVING SEISMICITY ON<br />

A HETEROGENEOUS FAULT IN AN ELASTIC HALF-SPACE Bailey IW, and Ben-Zion Y<br />

Understanding what limits the size of earthquake stress drops has important implications for<br />

estimating ground motion. Theoretical estimates based on laboratory friction data and<br />

measurements of stress in the crust are >100 MPa, yet seismological derivations are typically of<br />

order ~1-10 MPa. The discrepancy may stem from the fact that earthquake stress drops are average<br />

values over a rupture area that may have highly heterogeneous initial stress, while the theoretical<br />

estimates assume an essentially homogeneous stress. We investigate properties of stress drops in<br />

simulations of evolving seismicity and stress field on a heterogeneous fault. The model fault (Ben-<br />

Zion & Rice, 1993) consists of a set of inherently-discrete slip patches surrounded by a 3-D elastic<br />

half-space. The discrete slip patches provide a simple representation of heterogeneities associated<br />

with segmentation and other geometrical complexities. Previous studies have shown that the<br />

model produces many statistical features of seismicity compatible with observations, e.g.,<br />

frequency-size and temporal event statistics, hypocenter distributions, and scaling of source-time<br />

functions. The model simulations allow us to investigate stress drops from a range of initial stress<br />

distributions that are determined by the self-<strong>org</strong>anized stress evolution along the fault over time.<br />

We show that the stress drops are systematically lower than predicted for a homogeneous fault,<br />

and that this effect is stronger as larger events are considered. Events that saturate the seismogenic<br />

zone consistently have stress drops that are ~30% of the predictions based on the average fault<br />

strength, as well as showing less variation than the stress drops of smaller events. We further<br />

investigate how this variation is affected by rheological properties of the model and hypocentral<br />

depth.<br />

2-069<br />

CONSTANT STRESS DROP FROM SMALL TO GREAT EARTHQUAKES IN<br />

MAGNITUDE-AREA SCALING Shaw BE<br />

Earthquakes span a tremendous range of scales, more than 5 orders of magnitude in length. Are<br />

earthquakes fundamentally the same across this huge range of scales, or are the great earthquakes<br />

somehow different from the small ones? We show that a robust scaling law seen in small<br />

earthquakes, with stress drops being independent of earthquake size, indeed holds for great<br />

earthquakes as well. The simplest hypothesis, that earthquake stress drops are constant from the<br />

smallest to the largest events, combined with a more thorough treatment of the geometrical effects<br />

of the finite seismogenic layer depth, gives a new magnitude area scaling which matches the data<br />

well, and better over the whole magnitude range than the currently used scaling laws which have<br />

non-constant stress drop scaling. This has significant implications for earthquake physics and for<br />

seismic hazard estimates.<br />

2008 <strong>SCEC</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Meeting</strong> | 177

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!