Annual Meeting - SCEC.org
Annual Meeting - SCEC.org
Annual Meeting - SCEC.org
- TAGS
- annual
- meeting
- www.scec.org
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Group 2 – FARM | Poster Abstracts<br />
quite small, stresses concentrated at the rupture front are consistent with typical static (and low<br />
velocity) friction coefficients of 0.6-0.9; this stress concentration is required to initiate slip.<br />
Growing slip pulses have stress drops close to 3 MPa and feature slip increasing with propagation<br />
distance at a rate of about 0.14 m/km. These values are consistent with seismic inferences of stress<br />
drop and field constraints on slip-length scaling. On the other hand, cracks have stress drops of<br />
over 20 MPa, and slip at the hypocenter increases with propagation distance at a rate of about 1<br />
m/km.<br />
2-068<br />
STATISTICS OF EARTHQUAKE STRESS DROPS FOR EVOLVING SEISMICITY ON<br />
A HETEROGENEOUS FAULT IN AN ELASTIC HALF-SPACE Bailey IW, and Ben-Zion Y<br />
Understanding what limits the size of earthquake stress drops has important implications for<br />
estimating ground motion. Theoretical estimates based on laboratory friction data and<br />
measurements of stress in the crust are >100 MPa, yet seismological derivations are typically of<br />
order ~1-10 MPa. The discrepancy may stem from the fact that earthquake stress drops are average<br />
values over a rupture area that may have highly heterogeneous initial stress, while the theoretical<br />
estimates assume an essentially homogeneous stress. We investigate properties of stress drops in<br />
simulations of evolving seismicity and stress field on a heterogeneous fault. The model fault (Ben-<br />
Zion & Rice, 1993) consists of a set of inherently-discrete slip patches surrounded by a 3-D elastic<br />
half-space. The discrete slip patches provide a simple representation of heterogeneities associated<br />
with segmentation and other geometrical complexities. Previous studies have shown that the<br />
model produces many statistical features of seismicity compatible with observations, e.g.,<br />
frequency-size and temporal event statistics, hypocenter distributions, and scaling of source-time<br />
functions. The model simulations allow us to investigate stress drops from a range of initial stress<br />
distributions that are determined by the self-<strong>org</strong>anized stress evolution along the fault over time.<br />
We show that the stress drops are systematically lower than predicted for a homogeneous fault,<br />
and that this effect is stronger as larger events are considered. Events that saturate the seismogenic<br />
zone consistently have stress drops that are ~30% of the predictions based on the average fault<br />
strength, as well as showing less variation than the stress drops of smaller events. We further<br />
investigate how this variation is affected by rheological properties of the model and hypocentral<br />
depth.<br />
2-069<br />
CONSTANT STRESS DROP FROM SMALL TO GREAT EARTHQUAKES IN<br />
MAGNITUDE-AREA SCALING Shaw BE<br />
Earthquakes span a tremendous range of scales, more than 5 orders of magnitude in length. Are<br />
earthquakes fundamentally the same across this huge range of scales, or are the great earthquakes<br />
somehow different from the small ones? We show that a robust scaling law seen in small<br />
earthquakes, with stress drops being independent of earthquake size, indeed holds for great<br />
earthquakes as well. The simplest hypothesis, that earthquake stress drops are constant from the<br />
smallest to the largest events, combined with a more thorough treatment of the geometrical effects<br />
of the finite seismogenic layer depth, gives a new magnitude area scaling which matches the data<br />
well, and better over the whole magnitude range than the currently used scaling laws which have<br />
non-constant stress drop scaling. This has significant implications for earthquake physics and for<br />
seismic hazard estimates.<br />
2008 <strong>SCEC</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Meeting</strong> | 177