Annual Meeting - SCEC.org
Annual Meeting - SCEC.org
Annual Meeting - SCEC.org
- TAGS
- annual
- meeting
- www.scec.org
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Group 1 – EFP | Poster Abstracts<br />
1-089<br />
A FIVE-YEAR FORECAST OF EARTHQUAKE LARGER THAN 5 IN CALIFORNIA<br />
BASED ON SMOOTHED SEISMICITY Wang Q, Jackson DD, and Kagan YY<br />
A forecast method based on smoothed seismicity was presented by Kagan and Jackson (1994) and<br />
has been widely used since then. It is based on earthquake occurrences, and it assumes the<br />
earthquake rate density is constant in time and the rate density is proportional to a smoothed<br />
version of past seismicity. Kagan and Jackson (2007) have presented a five-year forecast of southern<br />
California earthquake with magnitude larger than 5. At present, we extend the forecast region from<br />
southern California to all of California using the new California earthquake catalog. This catalog<br />
covers all known earthquakes larger than 4.7 in California from 1800 to 2007. All earthquake<br />
magnitudes are converted to moment magnitude in this catalog. Earthquakes less then magnitude<br />
6.5 are treated as point sources. Some earthquakes larger than 6.5 are replaced by ensembles of<br />
smaller events with equivalent total moment, distributed along the rupture surface. This forecast<br />
model differs from others like it because it includes historical as well as instrumented earthquakes,<br />
and because larger events are represented by multiple point sources.<br />
1-090<br />
SHORT- AND LONG-TERM EARTHQUAKE FORECASTS FOR CALIFORNIA AND<br />
NEVADA Kagan YY, and Jackson DD<br />
We present estimates of future earthquake rate density (probability per unit area, time, and<br />
magnitude) on a 0.1 degree grid for a region including most of California and Nevada. Our longterm<br />
forecast is inherently independent of time and it is suitable for testing over a five-year period<br />
as part of the experiment conducted by the Collaboratory for Study of Earthquake Predictability<br />
(CSEP). In the short-term forecast the earthquake rate decreases following each past earthquake by<br />
an Omori-type temporal decay. The short-term forecast is meant to be updated daily and tested<br />
against similar models by CSEP. The full forecast includes a fraction of our long-term forecast plus<br />
contributions from the short-term forecast. Both forecasts estimate rate density using a radially<br />
symmetric spatial smoothing kernel decreasing approximately as in the reciprocal of the square of<br />
epicentral distance, weighted according to the magnitude of each past earthquake. Both forecasts<br />
are based on cataloged earthquakes only, with no dependence on mapped faults or geodetic strain<br />
rates. We made two versions of both the long- and short-term forecasts, based on the ANSS and<br />
PDE catalogs, respectively. The two versions are quite consistent, and for testing purposes we<br />
prefer those based on the ANSS catalog as it is complete to a lower magnitude threshold and has<br />
more precise locations. Both forecasts apply to shallow earthquakes only (depth 25 km or less) and<br />
they assume a modified Gutenberg-Richter magnitude distribution extending to a lower threshold<br />
of 4.0.<br />
1-091<br />
EARTHQUAKE PATTERNS IN DIVERSE TECTONIC ZONES OF THE GLOBE Kagan<br />
YY, Bird P, and Jackson DD<br />
We extend existing branching models for earthquake occurrence by allowing their parameters to<br />
vary by tectonic zone. We partition Earth’s surface into five zones: Trenches (including subduction<br />
zones, oceanic convergent boundaries, and earthquakes in the outer rise or overriding plate), Fast<br />
spreading ridges and oceanic transforms, Slow spreading ridges and transforms, Active continents,<br />
and Plate interiors (everything else). Our purpose is to specialize the models to give them the<br />
greatest possible predictive power for use in earthquake forecasts. We expected the parameters of<br />
the branching models to be different in the various tectonic zones, because earlier studies [Bird &<br />
Kagan, 2004] found that magnitude limits and other parameters differed by plate boundary class.<br />
2008 <strong>SCEC</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Meeting</strong> | 117