02.07.2011 - Village of Deerfield

More documents

Recommendations

Info

TO: Mayor and Board of Trustees FROM: Plan Commission DATE: January 27, 2011 RECOMMENDATION APPROVED RE: Request for a finding of substantial conformance for an exterior material change for the townhome roofs (Coromandel). We transmit for your consideration a recommendation adopted by the Plan Commission of the Village of Deerfield on the request of the petitioners for a finding of a substantial conformance. The Plan Commission held a workshop meeting on January 27, 2011. At that meeting, the petitioners presented testimony and documentary evidence in support of the request. A copy of the public hearing and workshop minutes are attached. In support of its request, the Plan Commission makes the following findings of fact and conclusions: Subject property FINDINGS OF FACT The subject property consists of the Coromandel residential development. The property was developed as a residential planned unit development (PUD) and was approved by the Village in 1994. The property is zoned R-5 General Residence District and is developed with 400 housing units consisting of 316 multiple family units, 68 townhomes, and 16 single family detached units. Proposed Plan The roofs on the townhome buildings in the Coromandel development are in a deteriorated condition and need to be replaced (see photos in petitioner’s materials). The petitioners have submitted a detailed packet that explains the proposed change to the roofing material for this development and the rationale for the change. The Coromandel Townhome Association wishes to replace the deteriorated and badly damaged cedar shake roofs with asphalt shingle roofs. The Coromandel Umbrella Association has approved the use of an asphalt shingle roof. The Coromandel Townhome Association conducted an advisory survey of the 68 town home units. The majority of the units responded in favor of the asphalt architectural shingle. The Coromandel Townhome Association has provided an evaluation and opinion from Coder Taylor Associates, Inc., an architectural firm that endorses the use of
the GAF/ELK Timberline architectural shingle (see exhibit 6 in petitioner’s materials). They endorsed the proposed shingle as a suitable material, and from an aesthetic point they believed the Timberline shingles blend very well with the brick exterior of the buildings. A material sample of the proposed asphalt shingle to be used was presented at the Plan Commission meeting. The South Commons development located to the north and northwest of the Coromandel development uses an asphalt shingle roof and they do not object to the use of an asphalt shingle roof for the Coromandel townhomes. Zoning Conformance Request for a finding of a substantial conformance Changes to an approved planned unit development (PUD) requires Plan Commission consideration and must ultimately be approved by the Board of Trustees. The exterior finishes that were constructed in this development are the approved exterior finishes, and a change to the roof exterior material requires Village approval. According to Article 12.09-G of the Zoning Ordinance: “Any subsequent change or addition to an approved a final development plan shall first be submitted for approval to the Plan Commission and, if in the Plan Commission’s opinion, such change or addition is not substantial, it may recommend approval to the Village Board without a hearing. If such a change or addition is construed to be substantial, a public hearing shall be held prior to such recommendation.” If the Plan Commission recommends that the proposed change to the planned unit development is found to be in substantial conformance with the previous plan and the Board of Trustees agrees, a public hearing will not be required to amend the plan. The request for a finding of substantial conformance avoids the cost and time of a public hearing. The petitioners would like to start on the roof replacement project in the spring as the weather will allow. Past requests that were approved by substantial conformance include: A change to the sign plan for Stoney River Legendary Steakhouse to allow an increase in the size of the sign. A change in the parking lot at Hyatt Deerfield Road campus (the Hyatt Hotel and 102, 104, 106, and 108 Wilmot Road office building) to add parking spaces to the property. A change in the Takeda tollway sign to allow for a larger ground sign along the tollway. 2
Page 1 and 2:
AGENDA FOR THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES Mo
Page 3 and 4:
January 18, 2011 The regular meetin
Page 5 and 6: Board of Trustees Meeting January 1
Page 7 and 8: BILLS & PAYROLL FOR THE FEBRUARY 7,
Page 9 and 10: February 7, 2011 Board Meeting Vend
Page 17 and 18: Village of Deerfield Payroll Summar
Page 19 and 20: Village of Deerfield Payroll Summar
Page 21 and 22: Public Works and Engineering To: Ma
Page 23 and 24: Report on Departmental Objectives F
Page 33 and 34: TO: Mayor and Board of Trustees FRO
Page 35 and 36: The proposed ground sign for a chil
Page 37 and 38: PLAN COMMISSION VILLAGE OF DEERFIEL
Page 42: Christ United Methodist Church & De
Page 55: REQUEST FOR BOARD ACTION Agenda Ite
Page 111 and 112:
REQUEST FOR BOARD ACTION 11-01-2 Ag
Page 113 and 114:
VILLAGE OF DEERFIELD LAKE AND COOK
Page 115 and 116:
sanitary sewer lift station within
Page 117 and 118:
corporate authorities of the Villag
Page 129 and 130:
REQUEST FOR BOARD ACTION Agenda: 11
Page 131 and 132:
WHEREAS, the COUNTY concurs with sa
Page 133 and 134:
THE ILLINOIS STATE TOLL HIGHWAY AUT
Page 135 and 136:
Page 137:
ATTEST: PASSED this ______ day of _
Page 140 and 141:
The U.S. Mayors Climate Protection
Page 142:
REQUEST FOR BOARD ACTION Agenda Ite
Page 145 and 146:
SECTION 1. Incorporation of Recital
Page 147 and 148:
B. Provide thirty (30) days notice
Page 149:
EXHIBIT 1. CONTRACT BEWTEEN SWALCO
Page 179 and 180:
Page 181:
Deerfield cemetery commission - 3 m
Page 197 and 198:
REQUEST FOR BOARD ACTION Subject: R
Page 199:
REQUEST FOR BOARD ACTION Agenda Ite
show all

02.07.2011 - Village of Deerfield

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?