10.02.2013 Views

Max Planck Institute for Astronomy - Annual Report 2005

Max Planck Institute for Astronomy - Annual Report 2005

Max Planck Institute for Astronomy - Annual Report 2005

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

log [��(log M/kpc 2 )]<br />

7<br />

6<br />

5<br />

4<br />

3<br />

2<br />

–0.2 0 0.2<br />

log M<br />

0.4<br />

LH 52 Area<br />

LH 55 Field<br />

0.6 0.8<br />

Fig. III.1.5: Mass Function of the main sequence stars of the<br />

LH 52 area and the LH 55 Field from observations with HST/<br />

WFPC2. The mass function is constructed by using the massluminosity<br />

relation provided by the theoretical stellar evolution<br />

models. The stars were counted in logarithmic (base 10) mass<br />

intervals. The numbers were corrected <strong>for</strong> incompleteness and<br />

normalized to a surface of one square kiloparsec. The errors reflect<br />

the statistical uncertainties. The arrows indicate the level<br />

of 50 % success in the detection of stars in the LH 52 area (blue<br />

arrow) and the LH 55 Field (red arrow). The mass function was<br />

found to change shape <strong>for</strong> stars with masses lower than 2 M � .<br />

The large majority of the observed low-mass stars<br />

with masses between 1 and 2 M 0 in both fields seems<br />

to be a feature of the general field population of the<br />

LMC. The mass function of these stars closely resembles<br />

their IMF, since low-mass stars evolve very slowly<br />

and no evolutionary effects are expected to have taken<br />

place, changing their original mass and <strong>for</strong>cing them<br />

to leave the main sequence within the life-span of the<br />

LMC general field. This time-scale is revealed from the<br />

corresponding Color-Magnitude Diagrams (CMDs) of<br />

the LH 52 Area and of LH 55 field. In this investigation,<br />

it could be shown <strong>for</strong> the first time that the Present-Day<br />

Mass Function (PDMF) of the main-sequence stars with<br />

low and intermediate masses in the LMC is not a single<br />

power-law, but that it is steeper <strong>for</strong> masses lower than<br />

about 2 M 0 with slopes between – 4 and – 6, while <strong>for</strong><br />

stars with masses greater than about 2 M 0 the mass<br />

function slope is more shallow, between – 1 and – 2 (Fig.<br />

III.1.5). This implies that the contribution of the lowmass<br />

stars in the main sequence to the mass function of a<br />

system is higher than expected, when assuming that the<br />

mass function follows the same slope <strong>for</strong> masses smaller<br />

than about 2 M 0 . The mass function of the stars found<br />

in the general background field of the LMC is used <strong>for</strong><br />

correcting the contribution of the background field to the<br />

stars found in the observed area of the association LH<br />

52. Applying this correction, the field-subtracted mass<br />

function of the main-sequence stars found with WFPC2<br />

in LH 52 is constructed. This PDMF covers only the<br />

stars which are members of the association and there<strong>for</strong>e<br />

log [��(log M/kpc –2 )]<br />

6<br />

5<br />

4<br />

3<br />

2<br />

III.1 Star Formation in the Magellanic Clouds 55<br />

� = –1.12 � 0.24<br />

(Gouliermis et al. <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

� = –1.12<br />

(Hill et al. <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

0 0.2 0.4 0.6<br />

log M<br />

0.8 1 1.2 1.4<br />

Fig. III.1.6: The Initial Mass Function of the association LH 52<br />

down to about 1 M � from observations with HST/WFPC2.<br />

Results from studies on both high- (Hill et al. 1995) and lowmass<br />

(Gouliermis et al. <strong>2005</strong>) stellar populations combined<br />

<strong>for</strong> the first time <strong>for</strong> the construction of the IMF through the<br />

whole observed mass range of a young stellar system in the<br />

Magellanic Clouds <strong>for</strong> stars with masses up to 18 solar masses.<br />

The IMF of the association is found to be constant through the<br />

whole mass range and it has a slope comparable, but a bit more<br />

shallow than a typical Salpeter mass function (plotted with the<br />

dashed line <strong>for</strong> reference).<br />

is the IMF of the system, since it is considered to be very<br />

young. Its reconstruction was possible <strong>for</strong> masses down<br />

to about 1 M 0 , due to observational limitations in the<br />

LH 55 Field.<br />

The slope of this IMF is found to be comparable,<br />

maybe somewhat shallower than a typical Salpeter IMF<br />

(Γ � – 1.12 � 0.24) in the mass range between 1 and 9<br />

M 0 . Previous, modest, ground-based CCD imaging by<br />

Hill et al. (1995, ApJ, 446, 622) led to the construction<br />

of the IMF of the same association <strong>for</strong> stars of intermediate<br />

and high masses (between 3 and 18 M 0 ). The<br />

combination of our results on the low-mass regime of<br />

the IMF based on HST observations with the ones on its<br />

high-mass end from ground-based imaging enabled us to<br />

construct the IMF of a young LMC association throughout<br />

its full observed mass range of 1 to 18 M 0 (Fig.<br />

III.1.6) <strong>for</strong> the first time. Its slope is found to be constant<br />

<strong>for</strong> the whole mass range, providing clear indication<br />

of a »top-heavy« IMF, which is well represented by a<br />

single-power law with slope Γ � – 1.1. Conclusively,<br />

the Present-Day Mass Function slope of the field of<br />

the Large Magellanic Clouds is found to be determined<br />

by the low-mass population, while the Initial Mass<br />

Function of the association LH 52 by its more massive<br />

members. This clearly suggests the local star <strong>for</strong>mation<br />

conditions in LMC associations may favor the <strong>for</strong>mation<br />

of higher-mass stars. No evidence <strong>for</strong> flattening of the<br />

IMF toward the low-mass regime was detected in our<br />

data, neither was a lower mass cutoff in the IMF down<br />

to the observed limit of about 1 M 0 .

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!