Gutachten Dresden_englisch_dritte f.indd - Fakultät für Architektur ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Another important aspect is the appearance of the landscape of the Elbe river bend from the perspective of a moving viewer. The landscape of the Elbe river bend between Loschwitz Bridge and Albert Bridge has special topographical qualities that provide continuously changing perspectives depending on the viewer‘s position. Continuously changing visual relationships are also obtained of the landscape of the Elbe floodplains and the adjoining landmarks. This visual effect is primarily created by the distinctive bend in the river and the simultaneous widening of the floodplain. In this way, pedestrians or cyclist going along the cycling/walking paths on the banks of the river, and ramblers on the meadow paths are continuously presented with new spatial impressions. Similar impressions arise when travelling on a steamboat or driving along Käthe-Kollwitz-Ufer, especially in a westward direction. The viewer is offered “dynamic perspectives“ with ever-changing spatial progressions that can be perceived at different speeds depending on the type and means of locomotion. 3.5 Conclusion An exceptional standard of artistic urban development and architectural heritage can be clearly demonstrated in the urban development of the Elbe river bend region between Albert Bridge and Loschwitz Bridge. This is evidenced by the planned and staged inter- action between the urban and the natural landscape. Since the Elbe floodplains remain undeveloped to this day, they can be perceived as an integrated landscape which toge- ther with the surrounding areas offers diverse scenic experiences right in the heart of the city. The wide Elbe meadows in the area studied form an almost unobstructed floodplain area with only a smattering of trees. As a result, the meadows give a feeling of scenic expanse which is totally unique in a large city centre. The river bend configuration reinforces this impression. By intentionally keeping the Elbe meadows free of development, visual relationships from many points of elevation have also been retained as much as possible. Throughout history, appropriate legal and planning regulations for buildings were imple- mented to protect the meadows from development. Since the beginning of the 19th century, a number of lookout points and popular destinations have been created to showcase the attractive landscape and the view of the Elbe river in the area studied. These locations offer an extraordinary view of the city skyline, the Frauenkirche (<strong>Dresden</strong>‘s restored landmark) and the landscape of the Elbe valley. Other lookout points on the Elbe floodplains serve to set up visual relationships between the individual sections of the Elbe river bend. Most of these lookout points offer views of structural landmarks or prominent features of the landscape. These specially 42
created lookout points must be given special treatment in the field of view analysis. The landscape of the Elbe river bend between Albert Bridge and Loschwitz Bridge has unique scenic and topographical features. This study must therefore focus on the impact of the prospective „Waldschlösschen Bridge“ project on the scenic qualities of this section of the Elbe valley, and not just its visual effects on the <strong>Dresden</strong> city skyline. To complete this urban and topographical study, the next chapter will investigate the special role played by prominent vantage points in the past and the way this landscape has been perceived as conveyed by historical descriptions. 43
Page 1: Visual Impact Study (VIS) of the
Page 5 and 6: 1 Introduction 1.1 Background to th
Page 7 and 8: 1.3 Structure of the study The stud
Page 9: In the time allowed for the study (
Page 12 and 13: 12 1200 Castle on the Taschenberg 1
Page 14 and 15: 14 1694 -1733 Augustus the Strong p
Page 16 and 17: 16 Figures 2.3, 2.4 Boundaries of t
Page 18 and 19: 18 Sites are ‚works of man or the
Page 20 and 21: 20 Figure 3.1 Boundaries of the spe
Page 22 and 23: 22 1850 1910 1940 1992 Figure 3.2 M
Page 24 and 25: 24 Figure 3.3 Dresden city map, 189
Page 26 and 27: 26 Figure 3.6 Adolf Lohse, Schloß
Page 28 and 29: 28 Figure 3.8 Theodor Lehnert, Phot
Page 30 and 31: 30 Figure 3.10 Development plan, No
Page 32 and 33: 32 Figure 3.11 Theodor Friedrich, p
Page 34 and 35: 34 Figure 3.12 Plan of the Elbe riv
Page 36 and 37: 36 Figure 3.13 Festival hall for th
Page 38 and 39: 38 Figure 3.14 Visual relationships
Page 40: 40 Figure 3.16 Lookout points in th
Page 45 and 46: 4 Perception and depiction of the s
Page 47 and 48: in Meißen” by Eberhard Kieser an
Page 49 and 50: for the national press when making
Page 51 and 52: Robert Geissler’s lithograph, pro
Page 53 and 54: 4.3 Conclusion Evidently, artists f
Page 55 and 56: 5 The planned “Verkehrszug Waldsc
Page 57 and 58: Plan 1862 Plan 1891 Plan 1898 5.1 H
Page 59 and 60: Plan 1900 Plan 1905 Plan 1934 see f
Page 61 and 62: Plan 1967 “Between 1960 and 1970,
Page 63 and 64: crossing somewhere in the Dresden m
Page 65 and 66: nach 1945 [Road and Traffic History
Page 67 and 68: fare, in particular its gradient. (
Page 69 and 70: 5.3 Building specifications for the
Page 71 and 72: current Käthe-Kollwitz-Ufer route
Page 73 and 74: The bottom chords below the bridge
Page 75 and 76: idge pylons were enlarged by expand
Page 77 and 78: Marien Bridge The Marien Bridge des
Page 79 and 80: The Old Carola Bridge The Old Carol
Page 81 and 82: etween Übigau (Washington Strasse)
Page 83 and 84: 5.5 Conclusion When the longitudina
Page 85 and 86: 6 Analysis of field-of-view impact
Page 87 and 88: c. the 3D model of the design of th
Page 89 and 90: using GPS co-ordinates. This techni
Page 91 and 92:
entire panorama. The field-of-view
Page 93 and 94:
The best method of realistically si
Page 95 and 96:
Source: author’s illustration/aer
Page 97 and 98:
entire panorama. It can be assumed,
Page 99 and 100:
South Bank 09. Dome of the Frauenki
Page 101 and 102:
View Sequences 1. Sequence A Elbe v
Page 103 and 104:
Details 1. Stauffenbergerallee In S
Page 105 and 106:
Waldschlösschen pavilion, the Elbe
Page 107 and 108:
Because of the currently complex si
Page 109 and 110:
7 Conclusions/Recommendations It is
Page 111 and 112:
as the effect of diffuse winter lig
Page 113 and 114:
Nor may the assessors outline any a
Page 115 and 116:
Text sources / Image sources Aussch
Page 117 and 118:
Kultur- und Naturerbes der Welt von
Page 119:
Imprint Commissioned by Dr. Roland
show all

Gutachten Dresden_englisch_dritte f.indd - Fakultät für Architektur ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?