Gutachten Dresden_englisch_dritte f.indd - Fakultät für Architektur ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

88 Figure 6.3 Comparison of impressions of the landscape in different seasons Source: www.dresden.de Figure 6.4 Quelle: v-cube
using GPS co-ordinates. This technical approach is not “new territory”. It has been applied in a number of studies. It has been tried and tested and has proved successful. A representation of the material quality of the bridge construction is not intended in the context of this study. This is because the design properties of the structure are clearly not the object of the evaluation, but rather its planned physical volume within the landscape. 6.2 Photographic quality As mentioned in the introduction, only an extremely restricted period of time was allowed for the entire study. It was therefore not possible for the authors to wait for optimal weather conditions to create the photographic base material. In addition, the winter season, during which the study had to be done, is not entirely suitable for the illustration of the characteristic properties of the Elbe valley landscape. These difficult working conditions did not, however, have any effect on the performance of the field-of-view analyses themselves or their evaluation. It must be assumed, however, that because of changed light and colour effects in the spring, summer and autumn landsca- pes, the bridge construction under examination would stand out more clearly than it did in the winter landscape used in the simulation. As the field-of-view analyses correspond to natural human perception, the appearance of the projected thoroughfare in the landscape of the Elbe valley is correctly represented in scientific terms. An evaluation of the field-of-view analyses was therefore unproblematic. 6.3 Selection of the viewing positions The analysis of the landscape of the Elbe valley as well as that of the important vantage points carried out in chapter 3, lead to the distinction between two different perception modes in the study area. A distinction must be made between the view of the Elbe valley area while moving, for instance from a riverboat or specially built viewing points. These different kinds of view also require a qualitative differentiation of the field-of- view analyses. As has been described in detail, various vantage points have been specially constructed in the study area in order to make it possible to view the entire valley area of the Elbe river bend or to view it at impressive places. An observer at one of these lookout points generally allows his or her gaze to “sweep across” the river valley. That means that the observer’s view not only moves in a certain direction, but also attempts to capture the 89
Page 1:
Visual Impact Study (VIS) of the
Page 5 and 6:
1 Introduction 1.1 Background to th
Page 7 and 8:
1.3 Structure of the study The stud
Page 9:
In the time allowed for the study (
Page 12 and 13:
12 1200 Castle on the Taschenberg 1
Page 14 and 15:
14 1694 -1733 Augustus the Strong p
Page 16 and 17:
16 Figures 2.3, 2.4 Boundaries of t
Page 18 and 19:
18 Sites are ‚works of man or the
Page 20 and 21:
20 Figure 3.1 Boundaries of the spe
Page 22 and 23:
22 1850 1910 1940 1992 Figure 3.2 M
Page 24 and 25:
24 Figure 3.3 Dresden city map, 189
Page 26 and 27:
26 Figure 3.6 Adolf Lohse, Schloß
Page 28 and 29:
28 Figure 3.8 Theodor Lehnert, Phot
Page 30 and 31:
30 Figure 3.10 Development plan, No
Page 32 and 33:
32 Figure 3.11 Theodor Friedrich, p
Page 34 and 35:
34 Figure 3.12 Plan of the Elbe riv
Page 36 and 37:
36 Figure 3.13 Festival hall for th
Page 38 and 39: 38 Figure 3.14 Visual relationships
Page 40: 40 Figure 3.16 Lookout points in th
Page 43 and 44: created lookout points must be give
Page 45 and 46: 4 Perception and depiction of the s
Page 47 and 48: in Meißen” by Eberhard Kieser an
Page 49 and 50: for the national press when making
Page 51 and 52: Robert Geissler’s lithograph, pro
Page 53 and 54: 4.3 Conclusion Evidently, artists f
Page 55 and 56: 5 The planned “Verkehrszug Waldsc
Page 57 and 58: Plan 1862 Plan 1891 Plan 1898 5.1 H
Page 59 and 60: Plan 1900 Plan 1905 Plan 1934 see f
Page 61 and 62: Plan 1967 “Between 1960 and 1970,
Page 63 and 64: crossing somewhere in the Dresden m
Page 65 and 66: nach 1945 [Road and Traffic History
Page 67 and 68: fare, in particular its gradient. (
Page 69 and 70: 5.3 Building specifications for the
Page 71 and 72: current Käthe-Kollwitz-Ufer route
Page 73 and 74: The bottom chords below the bridge
Page 75 and 76: idge pylons were enlarged by expand
Page 77 and 78: Marien Bridge The Marien Bridge des
Page 79 and 80: The Old Carola Bridge The Old Carol
Page 81 and 82: etween Übigau (Washington Strasse)
Page 83 and 84: 5.5 Conclusion When the longitudina
Page 85 and 86: 6 Analysis of field-of-view impact
Page 87: c. the 3D model of the design of th
Page 91 and 92: entire panorama. The field-of-view
Page 93 and 94: The best method of realistically si
Page 95 and 96: Source: author’s illustration/aer
Page 97 and 98: entire panorama. It can be assumed,
Page 99 and 100: South Bank 09. Dome of the Frauenki
Page 101 and 102: View Sequences 1. Sequence A Elbe v
Page 103 and 104: Details 1. Stauffenbergerallee In S
Page 105 and 106: Waldschlösschen pavilion, the Elbe
Page 107 and 108: Because of the currently complex si
Page 109 and 110: 7 Conclusions/Recommendations It is
Page 111 and 112: as the effect of diffuse winter lig
Page 113 and 114: Nor may the assessors outline any a
Page 115 and 116: Text sources / Image sources Aussch
Page 117 and 118: Kultur- und Naturerbes der Welt von
Page 119: Imprint Commissioned by Dr. Roland
show all

Gutachten Dresden_englisch_dritte f.indd - Fakultät für Architektur ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?