Gutachten Dresden_englisch_dritte f.indd - Fakultät für Architektur ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

82 Figure 5.28 Comparison of cross-sections of Elbe Valley bridges Source: DRNBW 1998 The cross-sections of the Flügelweg Bridge have been added Source: State Capital of Dresden, Department of Urban Planning and Development from 08/12/2003 and cross-section of Waldschlösschen Bridge Source: State Capital of Dresden; project bidding documents from 30/08/2005
5.5 Conclusion When the longitudinal sections of the bridges are compared, it is clear that the prospective “Verkehrszug Waldschlösschenbrücke“ would be the longest Elbe bridge in Dresden by far. Not including its bridge heads, the prospective Waldschlösschen Bridge would be 636 metres long. This would make it 140 metres longer than the “New Autobahn Bridge“ which lies outside the UNESCO World Heritage Site and is 496 metres long. The Waldschlösschen Bridge would be 163 metres longer than the Marien Railway Bridge, which has an overall length of 473 metres and is currently the longest bridge in the UNESCO World Heritage Site. However, this comparison is focused on the typological and constructive elements of the bridges. It has to be taken in account, that some of the bridges in the Elbe valley are provided with access dams, which are not shown in the longitudinal sections. Regarding the Waldschösschenbrücke on the other hand, it is planned not to build access ramps. Further on, the lengths of the bridges should always be seen in relationship to the different situations of topography and landscape they are situated in. Both, the changement of topography and landscape during different periods of time had a great impact on the lenghts of several bridges in the Elbe valley. For example, in the beginning of chapter 5.4 it was already mentioned, that the “Old Augustus Bridge” used to have a length of 525 – 660 metres originally. This length was shortened gradually. Consequently, the “New Augustus Bridge” errected in the same position than the “Old Augustus Bridge”, has now a length of 355 metres. This modification of dimensions is the result of the changement of the topographical situation of the Elbe valley in the course of the time. The two multilevel bridge heads on the northern and southern ends of the “Ver- kehrszug Waldschlösschenbrücke“ contribute to a new scale of the bridge within the UNESCO World Heritage Site. Especially on the northern side of the bridge, handling traffic in this way would require the bridgehead to be widened to 50 metres (carriage- way including bus stop and merging lane c. 27.00 m, widenings for pedestrians, elevator / staircase, access lanes c. 23.00 m). Within the „Dresden Elbe Valley“ World Heritage Site, no other bridge features such dimensions except for the „New Carola Bridge“, likewise intended to form part of a through traffic route; it has a standard width of c. 35.00 m and – like the planned new bridge – substantial widening at the bridge heads. However, relative to other Dresden bridges, this scale is exceptional. Also the noise barriers, which are to be constructed at the southern bridge head strengthen the impression that the bridge’s typology will not conform to that of the other city bridges. These features would lend the bridge an appearance that would not fit in with the other types of city bridges in Dresden, it will more closely resemble the bridges outside the UNESCO-world herititage site. As a result of the stipulation that the 83
Page 1:
Visual Impact Study (VIS) of the
Page 5 and 6:
1 Introduction 1.1 Background to th
Page 7 and 8:
1.3 Structure of the study The stud
Page 9:
In the time allowed for the study (
Page 12 and 13:
12 1200 Castle on the Taschenberg 1
Page 14 and 15:
14 1694 -1733 Augustus the Strong p
Page 16 and 17:
16 Figures 2.3, 2.4 Boundaries of t
Page 18 and 19:
18 Sites are ‚works of man or the
Page 20 and 21:
20 Figure 3.1 Boundaries of the spe
Page 22 and 23:
22 1850 1910 1940 1992 Figure 3.2 M
Page 24 and 25:
24 Figure 3.3 Dresden city map, 189
Page 26 and 27:
26 Figure 3.6 Adolf Lohse, Schloß
Page 28 and 29:
28 Figure 3.8 Theodor Lehnert, Phot
Page 30 and 31:
30 Figure 3.10 Development plan, No
Page 32 and 33: 32 Figure 3.11 Theodor Friedrich, p
Page 34 and 35: 34 Figure 3.12 Plan of the Elbe riv
Page 36 and 37: 36 Figure 3.13 Festival hall for th
Page 38 and 39: 38 Figure 3.14 Visual relationships
Page 40: 40 Figure 3.16 Lookout points in th
Page 43 and 44: created lookout points must be give
Page 45 and 46: 4 Perception and depiction of the s
Page 47 and 48: in Meißen” by Eberhard Kieser an
Page 49 and 50: for the national press when making
Page 51 and 52: Robert Geissler’s lithograph, pro
Page 53 and 54: 4.3 Conclusion Evidently, artists f
Page 55 and 56: 5 The planned “Verkehrszug Waldsc
Page 57 and 58: Plan 1862 Plan 1891 Plan 1898 5.1 H
Page 59 and 60: Plan 1900 Plan 1905 Plan 1934 see f
Page 61 and 62: Plan 1967 “Between 1960 and 1970,
Page 63 and 64: crossing somewhere in the Dresden m
Page 65 and 66: nach 1945 [Road and Traffic History
Page 67 and 68: fare, in particular its gradient. (
Page 69 and 70: 5.3 Building specifications for the
Page 71 and 72: current Käthe-Kollwitz-Ufer route
Page 73 and 74: The bottom chords below the bridge
Page 75 and 76: idge pylons were enlarged by expand
Page 77 and 78: Marien Bridge The Marien Bridge des
Page 79 and 80: The Old Carola Bridge The Old Carol
Page 81: etween Übigau (Washington Strasse)
Page 85 and 86: 6 Analysis of field-of-view impact
Page 87 and 88: c. the 3D model of the design of th
Page 89 and 90: using GPS co-ordinates. This techni
Page 91 and 92: entire panorama. The field-of-view
Page 93 and 94: The best method of realistically si
Page 95 and 96: Source: author’s illustration/aer
Page 97 and 98: entire panorama. It can be assumed,
Page 99 and 100: South Bank 09. Dome of the Frauenki
Page 101 and 102: View Sequences 1. Sequence A Elbe v
Page 103 and 104: Details 1. Stauffenbergerallee In S
Page 105 and 106: Waldschlösschen pavilion, the Elbe
Page 107 and 108: Because of the currently complex si
Page 109 and 110: 7 Conclusions/Recommendations It is
Page 111 and 112: as the effect of diffuse winter lig
Page 113 and 114: Nor may the assessors outline any a
Page 115 and 116: Text sources / Image sources Aussch
Page 117 and 118: Kultur- und Naturerbes der Welt von
Page 119: Imprint Commissioned by Dr. Roland
show all

Gutachten Dresden_englisch_dritte f.indd - Fakultät für Architektur ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?