an election process: first the Committees of each Association were elected by the retirees who were members, then the delegates from these Associations, in their turn, elected the F<strong>AFICS</strong> representatives to the Pension Board at the F<strong>AFICS</strong> Council session. Nevertheless, the Federation recognised that the election of the representatives of all retirees by universal suffrage was a process that could be envisaged, albeit different from the current system, when the voting status was eventually afforded to the representatives of the retirees. The Federation was ready to accept if that was the wish of the Board. On the other hand, a general election of the representatives of all retirees should not take place if it were not preceded by the granting of full Board member status to these representatives. The more so, since the election was for only two of the four representatives of the retirees. Will there be elections for the retiree representatives ? In 2007, the Chief Executive Officer of the Fund and Secretary of the Board published for the Board’s 54 th session a “Study on Possible Process for the Election of Retiree’s Representatives”. He considered that an election would require that a complex and costly (up to $ 150,000 per ballot) procedure be put in place for which the Fund had neither the funds nor the necessary expertise; it would thus have to be outsourced to a specialist consultant under the control of the Fund. In conclusion: “Because of the very substantial efforts and expenses involves, in the view of the Secretary/CEO, elections of UNJSPF retiree representatives should be mandated by the Board only when those representatives have been granted member seats on the Board and the Standing Committee. Until then, their representation, and the selection of representatives, should continue to be done by F<strong>AFICS</strong>, in consultation with the Pension Fund’s CEO”. The Pension Board did not contest this conclusion. Some figures will show the evolution, over the last 30 years, of the Pension Board and the range of its decisions. 31.12.1976 (first year in which the President of F<strong>AFICS</strong> participated in the Board) No. of active participants 42,917 No. of retirees and beneficiaries 10,515 Assets of the Fund US $ 1.3 billion 31.12.1986 (granting of official status to F<strong>AFICS</strong> representatives) No. of active participants 54,289 No. of retirees and beneficiaries 25,434 Assets of the Fund US $ 6.3 billion 31.12.2004 (Working Group on the role and composition of the Fund) No. of active participants 85,285 No. of retirees and beneficiaries 52,496 Assets of the Fund US $ 29.4 billion 31.12 2007 (last updated statistics) No. of active participants 106,566 No. of retirees and beneficiaries 58,084 Assets of the Fund US $ 41.4 billion Our representation cannot be only symbolic The figures confirm that more than ever, the retirees grouped around the Federation have an important role to play in the governing bodies of the Pension Fund: they are fulfilling that role today by making full use of the status they have been granted. Several members of <strong>AAFI</strong>-<strong>AFICS</strong> asked, in the course of the Association’s General Assembly on 4 th March 2008 (see report below) that F<strong>AFICS</strong> continue to seek full member status for the representatives of retirees in the Pension Board. Naturally, the goal has not and will not be lost sight of by the Federation. 45
But the key question, when that day comes, will be that the number of these new “full” members is not merely symbolic but fully reflects the weight of the number of retirees in the Pension Fund. We will have the opportunity to come back to this fundamentally important subject. Jean-Jacques Chevron 46