Bulletin num. 33 du 25-03-2011 - Institut des Amériques

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Transaméricaines108 sur 111 25/03/2011 10:44Mots-clés : Etats-Unis ; éthanol ; biocarburant ; pipeline ; énergie renouvelable ;cartographiehttp://www.carto-presse.com/Séminaire, conférence, journée d'étude, débat publicCentre for the Study of Democratic Culture University of Sheffield - Informal workshop(call for papers) : New Directions in Transatlantic Social Politics.Propositions de communication avant le 30 avril 2011 ; Atelier en septembre 2011Royaume Uni - SheffieldIn 1998, Daniel T. Rodgers’s published Atlantic Crossings: Social Politics in a ProgressiveAge. His magisterial study showed how between the 1870s and 1940s Americans,seeking solutions to the problems brought about by rapid urban and industrialtransformation, turned their gaze eastward. Shaken from their exceptionalistassumptions by tumultuous economic and social conflicts of the Gilded Age, successivegenerations of social scientists, planners, and politicians realised they had much to learnfrom an Old World experimenting with new programs like old age pensions,unemployment insurance, and a minimum wage. The major policy achievements of thefirst half of the twentieth century, Rodgers implied, were made in Europe and importedby the United States.By reimagining exceptionalism as a historical mindset that Americans could embrace orreject by measuring their nation against Old World rivals, Rodgers broke the virtualmonopoly of Early Americanists on Atlantic World history. His insights inspired newscholarship on the transnational exchange of social politics in a long Progressive erareaching from the end of the Civil War to the aftermath of World War II. Yet his workraises many unanswered questions, and more than a decade after /Atlantic Crossings/first appeared, we propose to explore new directions in the history of transatlanticexchange.- Rodgers implicitly reaffirms exceptionalism either side of the period 1870-1950; yearsin which, he argues, Americans were ‘peculiarly open’ to foreign ideas. So do we need torethink how we periodise the ‘transatlantic moment’ in social policy ?- Can supposedly localistic and inward-looking social movements such as Populism bestudied as part of a cosmopolitan Atlantic World of ideas too?- How did Atlantic politics change when the United States arguably became a netexporter of ideas after World War II?- In what ways did the flow of ideas and influence between and within conservativenetworks operate differently from, or in ways similar to, those of the progressives andliberals described by Rodgers ?We propose an informal workshop in September 2011 to explore new ways of thinkingabout the transatlantic exchange of social thought and policy, broadly defined, from thenineteenth to the late twentieth century. The event will be hosted by the University ofSheffield’s Centre for the Study of Democratic Culture.Potential participants are invited to contact the workshop coordinators with a brief outlineof their research (no more than 250 words). The deadline for submissions is 30 April2011. Contributions from postgraduate and early career historians are very welcome.Following a second, follow-up conference in early 2012, a selection of papers stemmingfrom the workshop will be submitted for a proposed edited volume with Palgrave USA.- Dr. Andrew Heath a.d.heath@shef.ac.uk- Dr. Daniel Scroop d.scroop@shef.ac.ukSenior Lecturer in American HistoryCo-director, Centre for the Study of Democratic Culture University ofSheffield Department of History Jessop West1 Upper Hanover StreetSheffield, S3 7RAUnited Kingdom
Transaméricaines109 sur 111 25/03/2011 10:44Contact : Jacques PothierDirecteur, Laboratoire Suds d'Amériques http://www.sudam.uvsq.frDirecteur adjoint (recherche & formations), Institut des Langues et EtudesInternationales http://www.ilei.uvsq.frUniversité Versailles - Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines47, boulevard Vauban, 78280 Guyancourt, FranceArticle - Charbit, Denis. Obama, Netanyahou et l'opinion publique israélienne : la lenteérosion d'une alliance ? Politique américaine, Hiver 2010-2011, n° 18, p. 11-36.Mars 2011 France -Mots-clés : Etats-Unis ; Israël ; Obama, Barack ; Netanyahou, Benyamin ; relationbilatérale ; histoire diplomatique ; politique étrangère ; opinion publique ; présidencehttp://choiseul-editions.com/CREA EA Université Paris Ouest-Nanterre-La Défense Séminaire FAAAM (FemmesAuteures Anglaises et AMéricaines) - Stéphanie Durrans : L'étrangeté de la langue dansLa Belle Zoraïde et The Awakening de Kate Chopin.Vendredi 25 mars 2011 France - Nanterre - La DéfenseHeure-Lieu : 14h, Université Paris Ouest - Nanterre La Défense (salle V 408), 200avenue de la République 92001 Nanterre Stéphanie Durrans, Université Bordeaux IIISéminaire organisé conjointement avec le groupe de recherche sur Les mots étrangers(Confluences, CREA) Contact : Marie-Claude Perrinhttp://crea.u-paris10.fr/faaam/CEE. Centre d'études européennes, CERI. Centre d'Etudes et de RecherchesInternationales UMR Sciences PO Paris, CNRS - Séminaire Les sciences sociales enquestion : grandes controverses épistémologiques et méthodologiques - InterventionMichèle Lamont : Par delà le bien et le mal : controverses autour de la recherchequalitative en sciences sociales aux Etats-Unis.Lundi 28 mars 2011 France - ParisHeure-Lieu : 17h - 19h, Sciences Po (Salle Jean Monnet), 56, rue Jacob - 75006 ParisEntrée libre dans la limite des places disponibles. Pas de réservationOuverture : Samy Cohen (Sciences Po/CERI)Discutant(e)s : Sophie Duchesne (Sciences Po/CEE, CNRS) et Daniel Sabbagh (SciencesPo/CERI)Le débat sera présidé par Nonna Mayer (Sciences Po/CEE, CNRSIntervenante : Michèle Lamont est Professeur à Harvard University et professeur invitéau Centre d'études européennes de Sciences PoComment définir l’approche « qualitative »? Quels sont ses fondements épistémologiqueset méthodologiques ? Qu’est-ce qui distingue ses critères de validité de ceux desapproches quantitatives ? De l’ouvrage fondateur de King, Keohane et Verba ( DesigningSocial Inquiry, 1994) à la réponse de Brady et Collier ( Rethinking Social inquiry ,2004), le débat fait rage aux Etats-Unis, au point que la National Science Foundation apublié deux rapports sur le sujet. Michèle Lamont, auteure de How Professors Think(2009) et co-auteure du second rapport (2009), nous présente une controverse qui nousconcerne tout particulièrement puisque de ce côté de l’Atlantique ce sont les approchesqualitatives qui prédominentMots-clés : Etats-Unis ; sciences sociales ; approche "qualitative" ; épistémologie ;méthodologieTextes ci-joints :- Ragin, Nagel, White, Workshop on Scientific Foundations of Qualitative Research(Washington, NSF, 2004)
Page 1 and 2:
Transaméricaines1 sur 111 25/03/20
Page 4 and 5:
Page 6:
Page 9 and 10:
Page 11 and 12:
Page 13 and 14:
Page 15 and 16:
Page 17 and 18:
Page 19 and 20:
Page 21 and 22:
Page 23 and 24:
Page 25 and 26:
Page 27 and 28:
Page 29 and 30:
Page 31 and 32:
Page 33 and 34:
Page 35 and 36:
Page 37 and 38:
Page 39 and 40:
Page 41 and 42:
Page 43 and 44:
Page 45 and 46:
Page 47 and 48:
Page 49 and 50:
Page 53 and 54:
Page 55 and 56:
Page 57 and 58: Transaméricaines57 sur 111 25/03/2
Page 101 and 102: Transaméricaines101 sur 111 25/03/
Page 107: Transaméricaines107 sur 111 25/03/
Page 111: Transaméricaines111 sur 111 25/03/
show all

Bulletin num. 33 du 25-03-2011 - Institut des Amériques

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?