30.09.2019 Views

Navigare 3 - 2019

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

news<br />

employees on ships<br />

Risk = probability X consequence<br />

Consequence<br />

Probability<br />

Considerably low = 1<br />

0–2 %<br />

Low = 2<br />

2–5 %<br />

Moderate = 3<br />

5–10 %<br />

High = 4<br />

>10 %<br />

Negligible = 1 Substantial = 2 Significant = 3<br />

Acceptable risk<br />

(1)<br />

Acceptable risk<br />

(2)<br />

Acceptable if<br />

compensated<br />

(3)<br />

Acceptable if<br />

compensated<br />

(4)<br />

Acceptable risk<br />

(2)<br />

Acceptable if<br />

compensated<br />

(4)<br />

Acceptable if<br />

compensated<br />

(6)<br />

Not acceptable<br />

(8)<br />

Acceptable if<br />

compensated<br />

(3)<br />

Acceptable if<br />

compensated<br />

(6)<br />

Not acceptable<br />

(9)<br />

Not acceptable<br />

(12)<br />

The Regulations on medical<br />

examination of employees on<br />

Norwegian ships and mobile<br />

offshore units regulate health<br />

requirements for employees<br />

working on board Norwegian<br />

vessels. The purpose of health<br />

requirements is set out in section<br />

1:<br />

“These Regulation shall ensure<br />

that any person working on board<br />

a Norwegian ship or mobile<br />

offshore unit is medically fit for<br />

service on board, is not suffering<br />

from one or more medical<br />

conditions likely to be aggravated<br />

by service at sea or to endanger<br />

the health and safety of other<br />

persons on board”.<br />

board and for a safe operation of the vessel.<br />

This may for example imply that the risk is<br />

high if the consequences are significant, even<br />

though the probability is low.<br />

The appellate body will assess each case to<br />

find any compensating measures to be<br />

employed in order to reduce the risk. Examples<br />

of compensating measures could be using a<br />

hearing aid, installing additional alarms in<br />

cabins, reducing work tasks or safety tasks,<br />

putting limitations on trade areas, implementing<br />

an obligation to inform the captain or the<br />

company, etc. The obligation to inform the<br />

captain is important since the captain has the<br />

executive responsibility for medical treatment<br />

and safety on board.<br />

If an employee does not satisfy the health<br />

requirements and he/she wants to apply for<br />

exemption from the legislation, the appellate<br />

body will most likely impose restrictions in the<br />

medical certificate if an exemption is granted.<br />

Such restrictions may depend on the position,<br />

e.g. two people must always be on watch, or<br />

one person cannot have any safety functions on<br />

board. If it is possible to organise the work on<br />

board in a different manner and this has been<br />

discussed with the employer prior to the<br />

application and a statement from the employer<br />

is included in the application, this will be<br />

favourable in order to reach the right conclusion<br />

at the appellate body.<br />

Knowledge and correct use of the legislation<br />

as well as proper documentation of the health<br />

condition and workplace are important factors<br />

when determining if an employee should<br />

continue to work on a ship after being<br />

diagnosed with an illness or health issue.<br />

In some cases, it is more important to<br />

document the functional ability than the actual<br />

health condition. The best way to test the<br />

functional ability is to work, provided that the<br />

employee is medically fit for it. We often see<br />

that employees at sea are passively waiting for<br />

the health requirements to be met. If it is<br />

possible to get alternative work on shore during<br />

such waiting periods, this would help<br />

determining the functional ability. It is rarely an<br />

option for seafarers to return to work gradually<br />

by means of graded sickness benefit (partial sick<br />

leave). It is important to talk to your treating<br />

physician if alternative work on shore is an<br />

option. This should also be discussed with<br />

NAV (the Norwegian Labour and Welfare<br />

Administration).<br />

The Regulations on medical examination<br />

of employees on Norwegian ships and mobile<br />

offshore units are drawn up to help maintain<br />

safety on board. However, it is in everyone›s<br />

interest to find the best solutions possible in<br />

order for employees to keep their job on<br />

board a ship by means of adjustments, etc. as<br />

long as it is safe and their health condition<br />

does not present a safety risk on board.<br />

There has been limited research on how<br />

important health requirements are to safety<br />

on board. How many of the seafarers who<br />

have been found unfit for duty have had<br />

symptoms after the decision has been made,<br />

that could potentially have caused serious<br />

incidents on board? And how many of the<br />

serious incidents that have occurred on<br />

board Norwegian vessels may have been<br />

caused by known illnesses? We are trying to<br />

find answers to these questions. The<br />

Norwegian Centre for Maritime and Diving<br />

Medicine is working to establish a health<br />

register. We would like to get involved in<br />

research to extend our knowledge and create<br />

a professional basis for the health<br />

requirements and targeted strategies of the<br />

future.<br />

<strong>Navigare</strong> 3 - <strong>2019</strong> | 65

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!