Marasi 28
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
فعاليات مالحية<br />
Judgment<br />
The DWT confirmed that:<br />
1. Decree 57 provided that “all claims and demands by<br />
and against [Dubai World or any of its subsidiaries]”<br />
should be brought before the DWT which includes jurisdiction<br />
over maritime disputes.<br />
2. The DWT Rules enabled the DWT to resolve all matters<br />
in dispute, including issues involving persons who<br />
were not Dubai World entities.<br />
3. The natural forum for the dispute was Dubai and<br />
Decree 57 required that claims against DP World be<br />
brought before the DWT.<br />
4. Owners were entitled to seek an order for the constitution<br />
of a limitation fund on a pre-emptive basis.<br />
5. There was no evidence in support of there being no<br />
mechanism for the establishment of a limitation fund<br />
in UAE law. The DWT considered that whatever procedural<br />
difficulties exist in the local courts, they should<br />
not lead the DWT to refuse to give effect to the UAE’s<br />
obligations under the Convention, in allowing a limitation<br />
fund to be set up.<br />
6. A P&I Club LOU was sufficient to establish a limitation<br />
fund in the DWT.<br />
The DWT considered that the Convention requires only<br />
that the guarantee is “considered to be adequate” by the<br />
competent authority considering limitation. The DWT<br />
was not convinced that there was a settled practice in the<br />
UAE courts as to the appropriate form of the guarantee<br />
to establish a fund.<br />
Comment<br />
The judgment is an important development regarding<br />
limitation of liability and establishment of limitation funds<br />
in the UAE. It is the first reported case in the UAE that<br />
acknowledges an owner’s ability to start pre-emptive limitation<br />
proceedings and establish a limitation fund under<br />
the Convention. It remains to be seen how this decision<br />
will affect the onshore courts but the judgment allows<br />
owners to seek to limit their liability in accordance with<br />
the Convention and rely on the lower limits in the UAE<br />
as opposed to those jurisdictions which have ratified the<br />
higher limits. Ince & Co acted for the successful claimants<br />
in this case.<br />
“I would trust Ince with our most complicated cases, they<br />
understand not only the business but have a fantastic grasp of the<br />
law and a knack of getting to the issue as quickly as possible”<br />
Chambers and Partners 7<br />
Providing legal advice to the maritime industry:<br />
Admiralty | Cargo recovery & defence | Charterparties<br />
Commercial contracts | Employment | Energy | International sanctions<br />
Marine insurance | Personal injury | Piracy & political risk | Pollution<br />
Property | Sale & purchase | Shipbuilding | Ship finance | Yachts<br />
Our International Emergency Response service 24/7, 365 days a year.<br />
Phone: +44 (0) 20 7<strong>28</strong>3 6999<br />
Please contact: shipping@incelaw.com or phone +971 4 307 6000<br />
incelaw.com<br />
Beijing Cologne Dubai Hamburg Hong Kong Le Havre London Marseille Monaco Paris Piraeus Shanghai Singapore<br />
MARASINEWS.COM 73