18.02.2013 Views

complete agenda - Florida Department of Environmental Protection

complete agenda - Florida Department of Environmental Protection

complete agenda - Florida Department of Environmental Protection

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

How to read the reports<br />

To improve the readability <strong>of</strong> the annual report, we have changed the layout <strong>of</strong> each site<br />

report, dividing it into three sections as follows:<br />

The first section <strong>of</strong> the report gives the reader an easy-to-read synopsis <strong>of</strong> the project<br />

area. We have included a map <strong>of</strong> the area and a table with the average scores for major<br />

categories used in evaluating the current conditions <strong>of</strong> the project area. The number <strong>of</strong><br />

stars indicates the number <strong>of</strong> team members present and voting for consensus on the<br />

two questions the team is required to respond to, pursuant to statute.<br />

In the Management Plan Review column <strong>of</strong> the table, the Green color<br />

coding means that the management plan sufficiently addresses<br />

management issues. The Yellow color coding in the Management Plan<br />

Review column means that the management plan does not sufficiently<br />

address management issues.<br />

In the Field Review column <strong>of</strong> the table, the Green color coding means<br />

that the management actions in the major category exceed expectations.<br />

The Blue color coding in the Field Review column means that the<br />

management actions in the major category are sufficient. The Yellow<br />

color coding in the Field Review column means that the management<br />

actions in the major category are insufficient.<br />

Major category scores are calculated by using the average score <strong>of</strong><br />

checklist items in each major category.<br />

Each team member present at the time <strong>of</strong> the voting phase is designated<br />

by a star. A green star means that the individual team member voted<br />

“Yes” when asked the following questions:<br />

Is the land being managed for the purpose for which it was<br />

acquired?<br />

Are actual management practices, including public access,<br />

in compliance with the management plan?<br />

A white star means that the individual team member voted “No” when<br />

asked the above questions.<br />

A yellow star means that the individual team member “Abstain” from<br />

voting when asked the above questions.<br />

The second section describes the review team consensus commendations and<br />

recommendations. The stars indicate the number <strong>of</strong> team members present and voting<br />

for consensus on commendations and recommendations. A green star means that the<br />

team member supports the statement, and a white star means that the team member<br />

does not support the statement. Consensus recommendations to the managing agency<br />

will be accompanied by a response, and will be addressed in the updated management<br />

plan.<br />

The third section <strong>of</strong> the report is the checklist findings. In this section, those checklist<br />

items that received high scores by the review team, and items that received low scores<br />

are noted. Items that received low scores are accompanied by a response by the<br />

managing agency, and will be addressed in the updated management plan.<br />

1

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!