18.02.2013 Views

complete agenda - Florida Department of Environmental Protection

complete agenda - Florida Department of Environmental Protection

complete agenda - Florida Department of Environmental Protection

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

APPENDIX B:<br />

I.A. Natural Communities<br />

� Facilities (such as the proposed campgrounds/cabins) should not be sited in pyrogenic<br />

communities. There are enough ruderal areas that all facilities should be built in these already<br />

disturbed areas. Hydrological alterations (ditching) has negatively affected most to all <strong>of</strong> the<br />

wetland communities.<br />

� Mesic hammock, bottomland forest, floodplain forest, and the floodplain swamp are affected by<br />

historic hydrological changes- ditching so unless hydrology can be restored it will not be a great<br />

representative <strong>of</strong> those habitats. Old hog damage- no new damage present so good maintenance on<br />

that. Cypress domes had historically been burned not much duff issues.<br />

� Floodplain forest and swamp appear to have been somewhat drained from ditch installation.<br />

Improvement with hydration once ditches are filled and wetland restoration <strong>complete</strong>d. The<br />

decreased hydrology is the only reason the scores are not in 100% maintenance condition.<br />

� Much <strong>of</strong> the floodplain forest and bottomland forests need hydrologic restoration from ditching if<br />

natural hydroperiods are to be restored to pre-ranch condition. Good effort with SWFWMD to<br />

start the hydrological modeling necessary to assess the potential to restore these communities.<br />

Much <strong>of</strong> the flatwoods on the north end <strong>of</strong> the property looked great, in “maintenance”, having<br />

received prescribed fire this past fall or winter. Excellent groundcover diversity. Many areas <strong>of</strong><br />

these north flatwoods had significant numbers <strong>of</strong> old growth longleaf pine. Further assessment is<br />

needed by DRP as to the need to reduce pine stocking to achieve optimum habitat conditions<br />

necessary to reintroduce RCW – a stated goal in the management plan. Be cautious, however,<br />

before doing any thinning in these pristine areas. Other areas <strong>of</strong> flatwoods – more in the southern<br />

half <strong>of</strong> the property appeared intact but, all be well out maintenance condition with no recent<br />

burning accomplished. Depression marshes in north end were in great condition with very little<br />

woody shrub growth due to regular fires. Again, more fire is needed on the south end to get fire<br />

into these marshes. Cypress domes have all had some hydrological impacts, however, most <strong>of</strong> the<br />

domes in the flatwoods looked pretty intact with 30-40 year old cypress. Fire has been allowed to<br />

burn down into the domes, resulting good looking ecotones.<br />

� Mesic flatwoods – good management strategy! Continue to focus on keeping good stuff good.<br />

Plan to bring rough flatwoods into maintenance in a phased way as resources allow. Don’t be<br />

afraid to kill pines with fire in overstocked areas, when harvest is not practical. Pasture – good<br />

condition. Be very careful with fertilization regimes. Excessive soil fertility will make restoration<br />

very difficult – also water quality concerns.<br />

I.B. Listed Species<br />

� Eagle Watch Program – participation, protecting nest, looking at hydrological restoration which<br />

assist management. Wood stork wetland restoration. Audubon inventory and other volunteer<br />

inventory work; not as strong on botanical inventory.<br />

� Excellent volunteer work to survey and develop plant and butterfly lists. Encourage continued<br />

efforts to expand plant surveys and taking the approach that this property can serve as an index<br />

site for all <strong>of</strong> the Green Swamp conservation areas.<br />

� Do proper management - and species/habitat will take care <strong>of</strong> themselves – resist micromanaging<br />

for single species whenever possible – manage the natural processes!<br />

I.C. Natural Resources Survey<br />

� FWC provided recommendation quality <strong>of</strong> fisheries. Annual butterfly and bird survey. SWFWMD<br />

doing surface water modeling.<br />

� Need to start monitoring and conducting bird, butterfly and plant surveys. Possibly recruit<br />

volunteer groups such as Native Plant Society.<br />

� Survey <strong>of</strong> hydrologic conditions for modeling has been and continues to be accomplished.<br />

Excellent efforts to monitor treated invasive exotic plants. Populations are tracked and<br />

documented in ArcView.<br />

� With limited resources, concentrate monitoring on response to management actions that directly<br />

support adaptation <strong>of</strong> management to achieve goals. Encourage volunteer monitoring in support <strong>of</strong><br />

interpretive programs.<br />

56

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!