om e 's Ali a - Land ss De elo en - Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung, India Office
om e 's Ali a - Land ss De elo en - Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung, India Office
om e 's Ali a - Land ss De elo en - Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung, India Office
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
and socio-cultural systems.<br />
Protection and mitigation of the<br />
adverse impacts of dev<strong>elo</strong>pm<strong>en</strong>t are<br />
not <strong>en</strong>ough for indig<strong>en</strong>ous people<br />
who did not opt for such projects<br />
in the first place. Fallout of these<br />
negative impacts, over the years,<br />
has forced them to build up their<br />
own distinct movem<strong>en</strong>t in order to<br />
survive.<br />
While dev<strong>elo</strong>ping Kalinga Nagar<br />
the people of the area were never<br />
tak<strong>en</strong> into confid<strong>en</strong>ce, perhaps they<br />
were not considered worthy of a<br />
dialogue, ever since the Governm<strong>en</strong>t<br />
of Ori<strong>ss</strong>a decided to transform this<br />
backward forest tribal tract into<br />
an industrial hub of Ori<strong>ss</strong>a. Their<br />
reaction to the early v<strong>en</strong>tures,<br />
therefore, was spontaneous and<br />
was guided largely by a survival<br />
instinct. The governm<strong>en</strong>t stand<br />
has be<strong>en</strong> totally legalistic, declared<br />
fr<strong>om</strong> a high pedestal reminisc<strong>en</strong>t<br />
of the colonial era. <strong>Land</strong> has be<strong>en</strong><br />
acquired according to an archaic<br />
law taking no note of the changes<br />
above and the reality b<strong>elo</strong>w. Those<br />
who held a land title were eligible<br />
for c<strong>om</strong>p<strong>en</strong>sation. They could<br />
be considered for rehabilitation,<br />
that too as a matter of charity<br />
and not because they had any<br />
Organised Response<br />
legitimate rights. Those who had<br />
no titles could, at best, expect<br />
s<strong>om</strong>e tok<strong>en</strong> dole. While dealing<br />
with the resistance they offered<br />
to implem<strong>en</strong>t the project, the<br />
governm<strong>en</strong>t showed no concern<br />
at all with the questions raised. No<br />
one cared ev<strong>en</strong> to learn fr<strong>om</strong> the<br />
experi<strong>en</strong>ce of other <strong>en</strong>terprises such<br />
as the Rourkela Steel Plant (RSP).<br />
What is never m<strong>en</strong>tioned in a long<br />
list of measures to be adopted for<br />
implem<strong>en</strong>ting the projects is how<br />
a popular elected governm<strong>en</strong>t of a<br />
free country would negotiate with<br />
the tribals about land acquisition.<br />
The state governm<strong>en</strong>t had acquired<br />
around 12,000 acres of land in<br />
Kalinga Nagar during 1992-94 for<br />
allocation to steel projects. Those<br />
who owned these lands were th<strong>en</strong><br />
reportedly c<strong>om</strong>p<strong>en</strong>sated at Rs.<br />
37,000 per acre with s<strong>om</strong>e additional<br />
c<strong>om</strong>p<strong>en</strong>sation later on which a tide<br />
of protests rose. Two c<strong>om</strong>panies<br />
implem<strong>en</strong>ted their projects, but<br />
neither met the pr<strong>om</strong>ise of providing<br />
employm<strong>en</strong>t to one person in<br />
every household displaced fr<strong>om</strong><br />
the land the projects now occupy.<br />
Th<strong>en</strong>, in 2004-05, the governm<strong>en</strong>t<br />
allotted 1,960 acres to Tata Steel,<br />
reportedly at nearly 10 times the<br />
53