28.02.2013 Views

Download File - JOHN J. HADDAD, Ph.D.

Download File - JOHN J. HADDAD, Ph.D.

Download File - JOHN J. HADDAD, Ph.D.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Peptide-Based Active Immunotherapy in Cancer 123<br />

PROSPECTS<br />

The growing number of TAA identified in many tumor types becomes a solid<br />

basis for peptide vaccine development. However, the antigenic profile of human<br />

tumors is very complex and consists of many peptides originating from various<br />

classes of protein. This fact should be considered carefully in designing anticancer<br />

vaccines. An important question is which tumor antigens are the most important in<br />

tumor regression in vivo. In any case, the ideal peptide vaccine most likely will<br />

consist of a cocktail of tumor antigenic peptides. However, the number of epitopes<br />

in the vaccine cocktail should be evaluated carefully since CTL responses in AIDS<br />

patients directed to fewer epitopes are associated with better clinical outcome (89).<br />

In this case it appears that the stimulation of multiple simultaneous CTL responses<br />

is clinically inefficient. The dose of antigen and the speed of antigen release in the<br />

vaccine formulations are also very important. High doses of antigen released faster<br />

may induce T-cell tolerance (90). Immune tolerance may be due to fast expansion<br />

and subsequent elimination of specific T-cell clones, or to apoptosis induced by<br />

repeated stimulation of already stimulated T-cells in cell cycle (91,92). Therefore,<br />

it is essential to select as immunogens those epitopes against which tolerance has<br />

not been induced (93,94).<br />

Currently, clinical responses to peptide vaccines, as determined by the criteria<br />

set for chemotherapy and radiation, have been difficult to assess. However,<br />

the lack of toxicity of peptide vaccines in patients with many different tumor<br />

types, and the clearly observed efficacy in some studies, support the use of peptide<br />

vaccination. Future peptide vaccine strategies will most likely focus on more<br />

potent and combined approaches for immunization. Applied in conjunction with<br />

surgery, radiotherapy, and/or chemotherapy, peptide vaccines can be effective in<br />

eliminating micro-metastases, in decreasing the immunosuppressive effects of the<br />

chemotherapy or radiotherapy, and in increasing the resistance to viral or bacterial<br />

infections frequently occurring in cancer patients. Recent advances in the design of<br />

polyvalent vaccines targeting several antigens are also very promising. In addition,<br />

the possibility to treat patients with peptide vaccines earlier in the course of the<br />

disease and to combine vaccines with other treatment modalities may also improve<br />

the vaccine efficacy. As a result, immunotherapy with peptide vaccines may<br />

become a major treatment modality of cancer in the near future.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

1. Rammensee HG, Friede T, Stevanoviic S. MHC ligands and peptide motifs: first<br />

listing. Immunogenetics 1995; 41:178–228.<br />

2. Rammensee HG. Antigen presentation—recent developments. Int Arch Allergy<br />

Immunol 1996; 110:299–307.<br />

3. Yewdell JW, Norbury CC, Bennink JR. Mechanisms of exogenous antigen presentation<br />

by MHC class I molecules in vitro and in vivo: implications for generating<br />

CD8þ T cell responses to infectious agents, tumors, transplants, and vaccines. Adv<br />

Immunol 1999; 73:1–77.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!