28.02.2013 Views

Download File - JOHN J. HADDAD, Ph.D.

Download File - JOHN J. HADDAD, Ph.D.

Download File - JOHN J. HADDAD, Ph.D.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

184 Chiang et al.<br />

technologies are enabling the stratification of cancers, the ability to follow<br />

cancer progression, the ability to stratify patients as responders or non-responders<br />

to therapy, and the ability to monitor in vivo cancer biology and therapeutic<br />

responses.<br />

Demonstrating the presence of targeted antigens in cancer cells is an<br />

important first step for selecting patients most likely to respond. A number of<br />

methods have been used to demonstrate that the targeted antigens are present in<br />

the cancer cells. The methods include traditional methods such as immunohistochemistry<br />

(IHC) and cytogenetics as well as newer molecular methods<br />

such as RTPCR, PCR, and in situ hybridization. PCR and RTPCR are highly<br />

sensitive methods; under favorable conditions, the presence of a few molecules<br />

of nucleic acids in the sample can be detected. However, these methods lack<br />

the ability to indicate the spatial distribution of the target molecules in reference<br />

to morphological features. For example, the detection of PSMA mRNA in<br />

a tumor sample cannot indicate whether PSMA is expressed by the tumor cells<br />

or neovasculature surrounding the tumor cells. Furthermore, the detection or<br />

quantitation of mRNA would not provide direct information on the amount of<br />

the protein antigen in tumor cells or its subcellular location. In addition, the<br />

detection of mRNA in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tumor samples<br />

(the most common type of archived samples) is difficult because of RNA<br />

degradation during the processing steps and storage of the FFPE samples<br />

(Table 2).<br />

IHC (and other in situ techniques), though potentially more labor intensive,<br />

allow spatial variation of expression within a sample to be observed. Distinctions<br />

can be made such as coexpression of antigens within the same cells providing for<br />

greater redundancy of targeting and reduced likelihood of escape mutants arising<br />

by antigen loss, and coexpression within different cells within the same sample,<br />

revealing how a greater proportion of the total tumor tissue can be directly<br />

targeted. Such information is also relevant to the use of antigens with more<br />

complex expression patterns. For example, PSMA, which can be expressed by<br />

Table 2 Assays for Patient Stratification in Targeted Immunotherapies<br />

Name Use<br />

IHC Ascertain tumor tissue expresses targeted antigen<br />

RTPCR Ascertain tumor tissue expresses targeted antigen<br />

Immune competence a<br />

Ascertain patients’ immune function<br />

HLA genotyping b<br />

Make sure patient has targeted HLA type<br />

Flow cytometry c<br />

Ascertain tumor cells expresses targeted antigen<br />

a<br />

for active immunotherapies only.<br />

b<br />

for T-cell–based active immunotherapies and passive immunotherapies relying on<br />

presence of HLA-peptide epitope complexes.<br />

c<br />

for leukemia.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!