Download File - JOHN J. HADDAD, Ph.D.
Download File - JOHN J. HADDAD, Ph.D.
Download File - JOHN J. HADDAD, Ph.D.
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
152 Bot and Obrocea<br />
processes during early exploration, and (3) considering novel, adaptive trial<br />
designs to direct clinical development in a more optimal fashion.<br />
“CANCER VACCINES”: KEY ELEMENTS AND CHALLENGES<br />
“Cancer vaccines” or active immunotherapeutics encompass defined antigens,<br />
analogues, or fragments, which are in fact molecular targeted agents. Immune cells<br />
such as Th or Tc cells or antibodies elicited by the vaccine are aimed to recognize<br />
specific molecules expressed by cancer cells or within the tumor environment. The<br />
indirect mechanism of action (MOA) is a distinctive property of cancer vaccines<br />
compared to other molecular targeted therapies. Particularly, while monoclonal<br />
antibodies or tyrosine kinase inhibitors act directly on receptors and affect cell<br />
viability or signal transduction pathways, vaccines relay on their capability to<br />
induce immune mediators that in turn act on the target (Fig. 1). This has farreaching<br />
implications in the R&D of such investigational agents and presents a set<br />
of unique challenges that distinguish this class of drug candidates from all others.<br />
In addition, there is no current benchmark in terms of approved cancer vaccine in<br />
the United States, increasing the complexity, risk, and heterogeneity of the current<br />
development strategies. The difficulty associated with establishing appropriate<br />
preclinical models along with a relative complex MOA hinders their predictability.<br />
By using preclinical models more often, it has been easier to predict whether a<br />
vaccine induced immunity in humans, as opposed to whether an immune response<br />
translated into clinical outcome. Unfortunately, this limitation along with the suboptimal<br />
clinical efficacy of investigational cancer vaccines evaluated in the past<br />
precluded the definition of reliable pharmacodynamic (PD) markers and surrogate<br />
endpoints that are key to guide and accelerate the development process. Moreover,<br />
the different safety profiles from that of more conventional classes of drugs and the<br />
considerable heterogeneity in terms of technology platforms—from highly personalized,<br />
cell based, to microbial vectors and synthetic, nonreplicating molecules—are<br />
distinct features of investigational cancer vaccines posing significant challenges in<br />
Figure 1 Challenges posed by development of cancer vaccines as largely related to the<br />
indirect nature of their mechanism of action.