28.02.2013 Views

Download File - JOHN J. HADDAD, Ph.D.

Download File - JOHN J. HADDAD, Ph.D.

Download File - JOHN J. HADDAD, Ph.D.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

152 Bot and Obrocea<br />

processes during early exploration, and (3) considering novel, adaptive trial<br />

designs to direct clinical development in a more optimal fashion.<br />

“CANCER VACCINES”: KEY ELEMENTS AND CHALLENGES<br />

“Cancer vaccines” or active immunotherapeutics encompass defined antigens,<br />

analogues, or fragments, which are in fact molecular targeted agents. Immune cells<br />

such as Th or Tc cells or antibodies elicited by the vaccine are aimed to recognize<br />

specific molecules expressed by cancer cells or within the tumor environment. The<br />

indirect mechanism of action (MOA) is a distinctive property of cancer vaccines<br />

compared to other molecular targeted therapies. Particularly, while monoclonal<br />

antibodies or tyrosine kinase inhibitors act directly on receptors and affect cell<br />

viability or signal transduction pathways, vaccines relay on their capability to<br />

induce immune mediators that in turn act on the target (Fig. 1). This has farreaching<br />

implications in the R&D of such investigational agents and presents a set<br />

of unique challenges that distinguish this class of drug candidates from all others.<br />

In addition, there is no current benchmark in terms of approved cancer vaccine in<br />

the United States, increasing the complexity, risk, and heterogeneity of the current<br />

development strategies. The difficulty associated with establishing appropriate<br />

preclinical models along with a relative complex MOA hinders their predictability.<br />

By using preclinical models more often, it has been easier to predict whether a<br />

vaccine induced immunity in humans, as opposed to whether an immune response<br />

translated into clinical outcome. Unfortunately, this limitation along with the suboptimal<br />

clinical efficacy of investigational cancer vaccines evaluated in the past<br />

precluded the definition of reliable pharmacodynamic (PD) markers and surrogate<br />

endpoints that are key to guide and accelerate the development process. Moreover,<br />

the different safety profiles from that of more conventional classes of drugs and the<br />

considerable heterogeneity in terms of technology platforms—from highly personalized,<br />

cell based, to microbial vectors and synthetic, nonreplicating molecules—are<br />

distinct features of investigational cancer vaccines posing significant challenges in<br />

Figure 1 Challenges posed by development of cancer vaccines as largely related to the<br />

indirect nature of their mechanism of action.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!