Download File - JOHN J. HADDAD, Ph.D.
Download File - JOHN J. HADDAD, Ph.D.
Download File - JOHN J. HADDAD, Ph.D.
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
42 Levey<br />
apoptosis and secondary necrosis (81). In these situations, amplification of<br />
endogenous responses to cross-presented antigen using antibodies against,<br />
e.g., CD40, may be sufficient to realize clinical benefit (82).<br />
Nonspecific Immune Modulation Plus Active Immunotherapy<br />
Another trend emerging in the practice of active immunotherapy with personalized<br />
(and nonpersonalized) cancer vaccines is their use in combination with other<br />
nonspecific immunomodulatory agents. Again, these combination approaches are<br />
likely to be necessary in any setting more advanced than minimal residual disease<br />
(83). Moreover, if the nonspecific agents prove to be well tolerated with minimal<br />
toxicity, there may be incentive to employ them even in the setting of minimal<br />
disease burden to further decrease the likelihood of disease recurrence. The<br />
nonspecific agents include antibodies against CTLA-4 that are designed to prevent<br />
effector T cell downregulation and a large number of agents that address the<br />
problem of immune suppression in tumor-bearing hosts. With emphases on preclinical<br />
testing, these various agents are discussed in turn below.<br />
Striking synergy between anti-CTLA-4 antibody and autologous GM-CSFsecreting<br />
B16 melanoma and SM1 breast tumor vaccines against established disease<br />
in mice has been observed, and the antibody has also been tested in combination with<br />
an off-the-shelf GM-CSF-secreting prostate cancer vaccine, with promising results<br />
in preclinical studies (84–86). In a preliminary study in human cancer patients previously<br />
treated with either autologous or off-the-shelf cancer vaccines who went on<br />
to receive infusion with anti-CTLA-4 antibody, only those patients who received the<br />
autologous vaccine demonstrated signals of clinical activity (87). Many additional<br />
clinical trials are underway testing anti-CTLA-4 antibody either as monotherapy or<br />
in combination with off-the-shelf peptide vaccines, GM-CSF, and off-the-shelf<br />
whole cell vaccines (88,89 and http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/). Unfortunately, there<br />
are no clinical trials currently underway testing anti-CTLA-4 antibody with personalized<br />
cancer vaccines despite the suggestion that autologous vaccines may be a<br />
particularly potent partner for this antibody. Will the dose of antibody required vary<br />
depending on what vaccine type is employed? This later question is of interest given<br />
the autoimmune-like toxicities associated with the antibody (90).<br />
In the last 10 to 15 years, the issue of specific immune suppression in<br />
tumor-bearing hosts has moved from a concept with few tangible toe holds from<br />
which to direct therapeutic intervention to remarkable progress in identifying<br />
molecular structures and cell types that are ripe for targeting in preclinical and<br />
clinical settings. One can envision that just as different chemotherapeutics<br />
have been combined in the clinic based on unique mechanisms of action, multiple<br />
agents each working to address distinct pathways of immune suppression<br />
will be utilized in combination. A nonexhaustive list of agents, their biological<br />
targets and evidence, where available, for utility in combination with cancer<br />
vaccines are presented in Table 3. Two agents that address the problem posed by<br />
accumulation of regulatory T cells (Tregs) are discussed in some detail.