28.02.2013 Views

Download File - JOHN J. HADDAD, Ph.D.

Download File - JOHN J. HADDAD, Ph.D.

Download File - JOHN J. HADDAD, Ph.D.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Diagnostic Approaches to Maximize Therapeutic Effect 193<br />

Immune Response Monitoring as Potential Tool for Therapy Guidance<br />

MKC’s cancer vaccine is an active immunotherapy aimed at inducing or augmenting<br />

tumor-specific T cells in vivo that leads to tumor regression and survival<br />

benefit. With the initiation of various vaccination trials, accurate and<br />

reliable assays for testing T-cell function is crucial for the evaluation, comparison,<br />

and further development of these approaches. The cellular immune<br />

responses have been evaluated using methods measuring cytotoxicity, proliferation,<br />

or release of cytokines in a bulk culture. However, these assays often<br />

require in vitro stimulation prior to performing them. A selection bias is automatically<br />

introduced with culturing of the effector cells, and the results subsequently<br />

obtained from these assays may not reflect in vivo T-cell function.<br />

The emergence of ex vivo assays represented by tetramer analysis, ELI-<br />

SPOT assay, and intracellular cytokine staining has significantly improved our<br />

ability to measure T-cell response to vaccine attributing to their capability of<br />

detecting antigen-specific cell at the single cell level and therefore providing<br />

quantitative information. The evolved multiparameter flow cytometry allows us<br />

to characterize T-cell subpopulations and provide a better understanding of<br />

antitumor immunity.<br />

The immune function varies among individuals, and the variation is<br />

amplified among cancer patients. It is common that patients respond to cancer<br />

immunotherapy heterogeneously. Therefore, it is important to monitor each<br />

individual’s immune response to vaccine treatment and adjust the treatment<br />

strategy accordingly to achieve clinical benefit. It is logical to measure the<br />

increase of tumor-reactive T cells, in vivo if any, by tetramer and ELISPOT<br />

assays, after vaccine administration. However, recent findings indicate that<br />

generation of a large in vivo population of tumor-reactive CD8 T cells alone is<br />

insufficient to achieve clinically significant tumor regression. Studies applying<br />

multiparameter analysis of T-cell phenotypes and functions demonstrate that it is<br />

the effective memory response that has a superior antitumor activity (35–37). No<br />

doubt, the multiparameter flow cytometry is a valuable addition to tetramer and<br />

ELISPOT assay for monitoring immune responses to vaccines.<br />

Tetramer Analysis<br />

The use of MHC1/peptide tetrameric technology to directly visualize and<br />

quantify antigen-specific CTLs was first described by Altman et al. in 1996 (38)<br />

in which soluble, fluorescently labeled, multimeric MHC/peptide complex bind<br />

stably, specifically, and avidly to antigen-specific T cells. This assay is easy to<br />

perform; generally 30 minutes staining of tetramer at room temperature is sufficient.<br />

Both fresh and cryopreserved PBMC samples have been successfully<br />

analyzed and have achieved comparable results (39). The tetramer is able to<br />

identify all the T cells specifically recognizing the MHC1/peptide complex<br />

composing the tetramer regardless of their functional status. Since the tetramer<br />

analysis is a flow cytometry–based assay, it can be used together with other cell

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!