28.02.2013 Views

Download File - JOHN J. HADDAD, Ph.D.

Download File - JOHN J. HADDAD, Ph.D.

Download File - JOHN J. HADDAD, Ph.D.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

32 Levey<br />

anecdotal that the lives of human patients with minimal residual disease are<br />

extended with autologous immunotherapy. It is therefore apparent that immunotherapy<br />

in preclinical models tells us something about immunotherapy of<br />

human cancers. Personalized cancer immunotherapy is also amenable to combination<br />

drug treatment as a considerable body of literature demonstrates, and<br />

the value of preclinical models of such vaccine/drug cocktails is also discussed.<br />

Combination approaches are likely to be required for extending the application<br />

of cancer immunotherapy beyond early-stage disease. Drugs and biologics that<br />

slow the rate of tumor growth and/or counteract specific immune suppression<br />

will be the key components of such combination approaches.<br />

PREDICTIVE VALUE OF PRECLINICAL MODELS<br />

Cancer vaccines have been extensively characterized in the preclinical setting,<br />

providing a strong foundation and supporting rationale for studies in humans.<br />

Several approaches are described in this section (non-exhaustive list):<br />

l Tumor-derived heat shock protein-peptide complexes (HSPPCs)<br />

l Tumor cells modified to secrete cytokines<br />

l Tumor cells modified to express costimulatory B7 molecules<br />

l Tumor cells mixed with the adjuvant bacille Calmette–Guérin (BCG)<br />

l Lymphoma-derived immunoglobulin (idiotype)<br />

Two key points emerge from these studies. First, therapeutic vaccination against<br />

cancer results in benefit to the host, as measured by complete tumor rejection,<br />

prolonged stabilization of tumor growth, and/or improved survival time. The<br />

evidence for this point is extensive and based on a large variety of tumor models<br />

(described below). Second, where examined, efficacy has been observed to be<br />

greater in the minimal disease setting compared with the setting of more<br />

advanced disease. This second point echoes the case of successful early intervention<br />

against established smallpox infection: If smallpox vaccine is administered<br />

within one to four days of exposure to the disease, it may prevent or lessen<br />

the degree of illness; however, the effect of vaccination is limited if administered<br />

once disease symptoms have already started (1,2).<br />

Transplantable tumor lines have been used in most preclinical immunotherapy<br />

studies, including chemically induced tumor lines and tumor lines of<br />

spontaneous origin. As transplantable tumors tend to become selected during<br />

passage for rapidly dividing clones that form palpable tumors within a few days<br />

after implantation in rodents, limitations on their utility arise. The most significant<br />

problem is the short lifespan of such tumor-bearing animals (typically<br />

3–6 weeks) and thus the narrow window in which to administer the immunotherapeutic<br />

and see benefit. As amplification of an immune response takes time,<br />

the rapidly dividing tumor may outpace the development of sufficient numbers<br />

of immune effector cells. This is a major limitation of current preclinical models.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!