05.03.2013 Views

national-clinical-guidelines-for-stroke-fourth-edition

national-clinical-guidelines-for-stroke-fourth-edition

national-clinical-guidelines-for-stroke-fourth-edition

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

etween 2 days and 7 months across a broad range of pathologies in adults and children.<br />

The majority of studies looked at stretch interventions of 0–6 weeks duration and in<br />

most instances to 4 weeks. Until the evidence base is more conclusive therapists must be<br />

analytical and critical in their practice in identifying who and when to splint and when<br />

not to splint. Splinting may be used to help manage tone, reduce pain and improve range<br />

of movement and function (passive and active). Splints should only be assessed, fitted<br />

and reviewed by appropriately skilled staff.<br />

6.11.1 Recommendations<br />

A Any patient who has increased tone sufficient to reduce passive or active movement<br />

around a joint should have their range of passive joint movement assessed and<br />

monitored.<br />

B Splinting of the arm and hand should not be used routinely after <strong>stroke</strong>.<br />

6.11.2 Sources<br />

A Consensus<br />

B Lannin et al 2007a<br />

6.12 Biofeedback<br />

One key aspect of any therapist’s work is to provide the patient with feedback on their<br />

per<strong>for</strong>mance of an activity or exercise. One method of enhancing feedback is to use<br />

technology which can often also provide more consistent, detailed and sometimes<br />

individually adapted feedback. Per<strong>for</strong>mance measures monitored in this way include<br />

muscle activity (electromyography (EMG)) and balance (<strong>for</strong>ce plat<strong>for</strong>m), and the<br />

feedback may be auditory or visual. For biofeedback <strong>for</strong> dysphagia see section 6.21.<br />

Evidence to recommendations<br />

The <strong>stroke</strong> literature on biofeedback contains small to moderate sized RCTs and<br />

systematic reviews. From the current evidence it is not possible to determine which<br />

combinations or characteristics of feedback are most beneficial, but augmented visual<br />

feedback in general has added value (Molier et al 2010). When feedback is directed<br />

towards Knowledge of Per<strong>for</strong>mance (KP), quality of movement improves more than<br />

when Knowledge of Results (KR) feedback is given (Cirstea and Levin 2007).<br />

Many biofeedback machines are promoted <strong>for</strong> use after <strong>stroke</strong> but there remains<br />

insufficient evidence of benefit to justify their use outside the context of a <strong>clinical</strong> trial<br />

(van Dijk et al 2005; Wood<strong>for</strong>d and Price 2007).<br />

6.12.1 Recommendation<br />

6 Recovery phase from impairments and limited activities: rehabilitation<br />

A Stroke patients should not be offered biofeedback outside the context of a <strong>clinical</strong><br />

trial.<br />

© Royal College of Physicians 2012 89

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!