05.03.2013 Views

national-clinical-guidelines-for-stroke-fourth-edition

national-clinical-guidelines-for-stroke-fourth-edition

national-clinical-guidelines-for-stroke-fourth-edition

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Evidence to recommendations<br />

There is only one trial on this topic which included a small planned subgroup of 66<br />

people with dysarthria (Bowen et al 2012a). There was no significant difference between<br />

speech and language therapy treatment and attention control <strong>for</strong> people with dysarthria<br />

in the first few months of <strong>stroke</strong>, but a nested, qualitative study found that early, regular<br />

and frequent contact (from a therapist or a visitor) was positively rated by patients and<br />

carers (Young et al 2012).<br />

6.20.2.1 Recommendations<br />

6.20.2.2 Sources<br />

A Any patient whose speech is unclear or unintelligible following <strong>stroke</strong> so that<br />

communication is limited or unreliable should be assessed by a speech and language<br />

therapist to determine the nature and cause of the speech impairment and<br />

communication restriction.<br />

B Any person who has dysarthria following <strong>stroke</strong> which is sufficiently severe to limit<br />

communication should:<br />

● be taught techniques to improve the clarity of their speech<br />

● be assessed <strong>for</strong> compensatory alternative and augmentative communication<br />

techniques (eg letter board, communication aids) if speech remains<br />

unintelligible.<br />

C The communication partners (eg carers, staff) of a person with severe dysarthria<br />

following <strong>stroke</strong> should be taught how to assist the person in their communication.<br />

A Consensus<br />

B King and Gallegos-Santillan 1999; Mackenzie and Lowit 2007; Palmer and Enderby<br />

2007<br />

C King and Gallegos-Santillan 1999<br />

6.20.3 Apraxia of speech<br />

A few patients have specific and relatively isolated impairment of the ability to plan and<br />

execute the multiple skilled oral motor tasks that underlie successful talking; this is<br />

apraxia of speech. It is usually associated with left hemisphere damage, and hence<br />

requires careful separation from aphasia as well as from dysarthria. Studies are often<br />

small, no trials were identified in a Cochrane review (West et al 2005) or in subsequent<br />

searches <strong>for</strong> this guideline, and there<strong>for</strong>e the evidence of treatment effects is limited.<br />

Interventions such as syllable level therapy and metrical pacing have been studied and the<br />

use of computers to increase intensity of practice has been suggested.<br />

6.20.3.1 Recommendations<br />

6 Recovery phase from impairments and limited activities: rehabilitation<br />

A Any <strong>stroke</strong> patient who has marked difficulty articulating words should be <strong>for</strong>mally<br />

assessed <strong>for</strong> apraxia of speech and treated to maximise articulation of targeted words<br />

and rate of speech to improve intelligibility.<br />

© Royal College of Physicians 2012 99

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!