national-clinical-guidelines-for-stroke-fourth-edition
national-clinical-guidelines-for-stroke-fourth-edition
national-clinical-guidelines-for-stroke-fourth-edition
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Evidence to recommendations<br />
There is only one trial on this topic which included a small planned subgroup of 66<br />
people with dysarthria (Bowen et al 2012a). There was no significant difference between<br />
speech and language therapy treatment and attention control <strong>for</strong> people with dysarthria<br />
in the first few months of <strong>stroke</strong>, but a nested, qualitative study found that early, regular<br />
and frequent contact (from a therapist or a visitor) was positively rated by patients and<br />
carers (Young et al 2012).<br />
6.20.2.1 Recommendations<br />
6.20.2.2 Sources<br />
A Any patient whose speech is unclear or unintelligible following <strong>stroke</strong> so that<br />
communication is limited or unreliable should be assessed by a speech and language<br />
therapist to determine the nature and cause of the speech impairment and<br />
communication restriction.<br />
B Any person who has dysarthria following <strong>stroke</strong> which is sufficiently severe to limit<br />
communication should:<br />
● be taught techniques to improve the clarity of their speech<br />
● be assessed <strong>for</strong> compensatory alternative and augmentative communication<br />
techniques (eg letter board, communication aids) if speech remains<br />
unintelligible.<br />
C The communication partners (eg carers, staff) of a person with severe dysarthria<br />
following <strong>stroke</strong> should be taught how to assist the person in their communication.<br />
A Consensus<br />
B King and Gallegos-Santillan 1999; Mackenzie and Lowit 2007; Palmer and Enderby<br />
2007<br />
C King and Gallegos-Santillan 1999<br />
6.20.3 Apraxia of speech<br />
A few patients have specific and relatively isolated impairment of the ability to plan and<br />
execute the multiple skilled oral motor tasks that underlie successful talking; this is<br />
apraxia of speech. It is usually associated with left hemisphere damage, and hence<br />
requires careful separation from aphasia as well as from dysarthria. Studies are often<br />
small, no trials were identified in a Cochrane review (West et al 2005) or in subsequent<br />
searches <strong>for</strong> this guideline, and there<strong>for</strong>e the evidence of treatment effects is limited.<br />
Interventions such as syllable level therapy and metrical pacing have been studied and the<br />
use of computers to increase intensity of practice has been suggested.<br />
6.20.3.1 Recommendations<br />
6 Recovery phase from impairments and limited activities: rehabilitation<br />
A Any <strong>stroke</strong> patient who has marked difficulty articulating words should be <strong>for</strong>mally<br />
assessed <strong>for</strong> apraxia of speech and treated to maximise articulation of targeted words<br />
and rate of speech to improve intelligibility.<br />
© Royal College of Physicians 2012 99