05.03.2013 Views

national-clinical-guidelines-for-stroke-fourth-edition

national-clinical-guidelines-for-stroke-fourth-edition

national-clinical-guidelines-for-stroke-fourth-edition

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

esources to respond to the need. Protocols should be in place <strong>for</strong> the use of the new oral<br />

anticoagulants in the setting of TIA clinics, with processes to supervise the transition<br />

from acute to longer-term anticoagulation.<br />

4.3 Specialist diagnosis of acute transient event (TIA)<br />

Following the recommendations above, all patients identified as having a potential<br />

transient ischaemic event should be assessed and investigated at a specialist clinic either<br />

within 24 hours or <strong>for</strong> low-risk patients, within a maximum of 1 week. This section<br />

describes the further diagnostic process which has two goals: alternative diagnoses <strong>for</strong> the<br />

transient neurological event must be ruled out as far as possible and the vascular territory<br />

affected must be determined. Both are largely <strong>clinical</strong>ly driven processes depending upon<br />

skilful history taking.<br />

Evidence to recommendations<br />

There is little evidence to guide the use of brain imaging after TIA. The consensus of the<br />

working party is that imaging all patients referred to a neurovascular clinic is not a<br />

<strong>clinical</strong>ly appropriate or cost-effective strategy given the high rate of TIA mimics in<br />

most clinics. Imaging should be restricted to those patients where the results of such<br />

imaging are likely to influence management such as confirming the territory of<br />

ischaemia prior to making a decision about carotid artery surgery, and only once the<br />

patient has been assessed <strong>clinical</strong>ly by a <strong>stroke</strong> specialist. Where imaging is considered<br />

desirable, then the greater sensitivity of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to detect<br />

ischaemic lesions, particularly using diffusion-weighted imaging, makes it the modality<br />

of choice.<br />

4.3.1 Recommendations<br />

A People who have had a suspected TIA should be assessed by a specialist (within 1<br />

week of symptom onset) be<strong>for</strong>e a decision on brain imaging is made.<br />

B People who have had a suspected TIA who need brain imaging (that is, those in<br />

whom vascular territory or pathology is uncertain) should undergo diffusionweighted<br />

MRI except where contraindicated, in which case computed tomography<br />

(CT) should be used.<br />

C People who have a suspected TIA at high risk of <strong>stroke</strong> (eg an ABCD2 score of 4 or<br />

above or with crescendo TIA) in whom vascular territory or pathology is uncertain,<br />

should undergo urgent brain imaging (preferably diffusion-weighted MRI).<br />

D People with a suspected TIA at low risk of <strong>stroke</strong> (eg an ABCD2 score of less than 4)<br />

in whom vascular territory or pathology is uncertain should undergo brain imaging<br />

within 1 week of onset of symptoms (preferably diffusion-weighted MRI).<br />

4.3.2 Sources<br />

A National Institute <strong>for</strong> Health and Clinical Excellence 2008b; Ay et al 2009<br />

B–C National Institute <strong>for</strong> Health and Clinical Excellence 2008b<br />

D National Institute <strong>for</strong> Health and Clinical Excellence 2008b; consensus<br />

4 Acute phase care<br />

© Royal College of Physicians 2012 41

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!