05.03.2013 Views

national-clinical-guidelines-for-stroke-fourth-edition

national-clinical-guidelines-for-stroke-fourth-edition

national-clinical-guidelines-for-stroke-fourth-edition

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

D Any patient who has developed, or is developing, shoulder subluxation should be<br />

considered <strong>for</strong> functional electrical stimulation of the supraspinatus and deltoid<br />

muscles.<br />

E In the absence of inflammatory disorders, intra-articular steroid injections should not<br />

be used <strong>for</strong> post-<strong>stroke</strong> shoulder pain.<br />

6.19.2.2 Sources<br />

A–C Consensus<br />

D Fil et al 2011; Koyuncu et al 2010<br />

E Kalita et al 2006; Lakse et al 2009<br />

6.19.3 Neuropathic pain (central post-<strong>stroke</strong> pain)<br />

Stroke is one cause of pain following damage to neural tissues (so-called neuropathic<br />

pain, or central post-<strong>stroke</strong> pain). The incidence of neuropathic pain is uncertain, with<br />

estimates varying between 5% and 20%. However, if present it is unpleasant and warrants<br />

treatment. There may be some overlap with both spasticity which can cause pain, and<br />

with sensory loss which can be associated with unpleasant sensory phenomena. It is, in<br />

principle, separate from musculoskeletal pain, which is considered in the next section<br />

(6.19.4).<br />

Evidence to recommendations<br />

There is very little trial evidence on the management of neuropathic pain specific to<br />

post-<strong>stroke</strong> patients, and it may well be that post-<strong>stroke</strong> neuropathic pain is different<br />

from neuropathic pain resulting from other conditions such as peripheral neuropathies<br />

or spinal cord pathology. The recommendations below are largely taken from the NICE<br />

guidance on neuropathic pain. The group that developed the guidance considered that<br />

pregabalin was preferable to gabapentin because evidence from indirect comparisons of<br />

meta-analyses of the two treatments showed that pregabalin has lower number needed<br />

to treat (NNT) values <strong>for</strong> at least 30% pain reduction and at least 50% pain reduction<br />

compared with gabapentin, with a similar adverse-effect profile. Pregabalin also has<br />

simple dosing and titration compared with gabapentin. Cost-effectiveness analysis<br />

conducted by NICE also suggested that pregabalin should be the initial treatment of<br />

choice. There is no evidence to show that simple or opioid analgesics have any role in<br />

the treatment of neuropathic pain.<br />

6.19.3.1 Recommendations<br />

6 Recovery phase from impairments and limited activities: rehabilitation<br />

A Every patient whose pain has been diagnosed by someone with appropriate expertise<br />

in neuropathic pain should be given oral amitriptyline, gabapentin or pregabalin as<br />

first-line treatment:<br />

● amitriptyline: start at 10 mg per day, with gradual upward titration to an effective<br />

dose or the person’s maximum tolerated dose of no higher than 75 mg per day<br />

(higher doses could be considered in consultation with a specialist pain service)<br />

● gabapentin: use 300 mg twice daily increasing to a maximum of 3.6 g per day<br />

© Royal College of Physicians 2012 95

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!