05.03.2013 Views

national-clinical-guidelines-for-stroke-fourth-edition

national-clinical-guidelines-for-stroke-fourth-edition

national-clinical-guidelines-for-stroke-fourth-edition

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Speech and language therapy concise guide <strong>for</strong> <strong>stroke</strong> 2012<br />

National <strong>clinical</strong> guideline <strong>for</strong> <strong>stroke</strong><br />

monitored using appropriate <strong>clinical</strong> measures<br />

such as numerical rating scales, visual analogue<br />

scales, goal attainment rating or a standardised<br />

measure appropriate <strong>for</strong> the impairment.<br />

E The nature and consequences of a patient’s<br />

impairments should always be explained to the<br />

patient and to the carer(s), and if necessary<br />

and possible they should be taught strategies or<br />

offered treatments to overcome or compensate<br />

<strong>for</strong> any impairment affecting activities or<br />

safety, or causing distress.<br />

Aphasia (6.20.1.1)<br />

A All patients with communication problems<br />

following <strong>stroke</strong> should have an initial<br />

assessment by a speech and language therapist<br />

to diagnose the communication problem and<br />

to explain the nature and implications to the<br />

patient, family and multidisciplinary team.<br />

Routine reassessment of the impairment or<br />

diagnosis in the early stages of <strong>stroke</strong><br />

(immediate and up to 4 months) should not be<br />

per<strong>for</strong>med unless there is a specific purpose eg<br />

to assess mental capacity.<br />

B In the early stages of <strong>stroke</strong> (immediate and up<br />

to 4 months) patients identified as having<br />

aphasia as the cause of the impairment should<br />

be given the opportunity to practise their<br />

language and communication skills as tolerated<br />

by the patient.<br />

C Beyond the early stages of <strong>stroke</strong> (immediate<br />

and up to 4 months), patients with<br />

communication problems caused by aphasia<br />

should be reassessed to determine whether they<br />

are more suitable <strong>for</strong> more intensive treatment<br />

with the aim of developing greater participation<br />

in social activities. This may include a range of<br />

approaches such as using an assistant or<br />

volunteer, family member or communication<br />

partner guided by the speech and language<br />

therapist, computer-based practice programmes<br />

and other functional methods.<br />

D Patients with impaired communication should<br />

be considered <strong>for</strong> assistive technology and<br />

communication aids by an appropriately<br />

trained clinician.<br />

E Patients with aphasia whose first language is<br />

not English should be offered assessment and<br />

communication practice in their preferred<br />

language.<br />

F Education and training of health/social care<br />

staff, carers and relatives regarding the <strong>stroke</strong><br />

patient’s communication impairments should<br />

be provided by a speech and language<br />

therapist. Any education and training should<br />

enable communication partners to use<br />

appropriate communication strategies to<br />

optimise patient engagement and choice, and<br />

the delivery of other rehabilitation<br />

programmes.<br />

Dysarthria (6.20.2.1)<br />

A Any patient whose speech is unclear or<br />

unintelligible following <strong>stroke</strong> so that<br />

communication is limited or unreliable should<br />

be assessed by a speech and language therapist<br />

to determine the nature and cause of the<br />

speech impairment and communication<br />

restriction.<br />

B Any person who has dysarthria following<br />

<strong>stroke</strong> which is sufficiently severe to limit<br />

communication should:<br />

● be taught techniques to improve the clarity<br />

of their speech<br />

● be assessed <strong>for</strong> compensatory alternative<br />

and augmentative communication<br />

techniques (eg letter board, communication<br />

aids) if speech remains unintelligible.<br />

C The communication partners (eg carers, staff)<br />

of a person with severe dysarthria following<br />

<strong>stroke</strong> should be taught how to assist the<br />

person in their communication.<br />

Apraxia of speech (6.20.3.1)<br />

A Any <strong>stroke</strong> patient who has marked difficulty<br />

articulating words should be <strong>for</strong>mally assessed<br />

<strong>for</strong> apraxia of speech and treated to maximise<br />

articulation of targeted words and rate of<br />

speech to improve intelligibility.<br />

B Any <strong>stroke</strong> patient with severe communication<br />

difficulties but reasonable cognition and<br />

174 © Royal College of Physicians 2012

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!