national-clinical-guidelines-for-stroke-fourth-edition
national-clinical-guidelines-for-stroke-fourth-edition
national-clinical-guidelines-for-stroke-fourth-edition
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
National <strong>clinical</strong> guideline <strong>for</strong> <strong>stroke</strong><br />
6.20.3.2 Sources<br />
B Any <strong>stroke</strong> patient with severe communication difficulties but reasonable cognition<br />
and language function should be assessed <strong>for</strong> and provided with appropriate<br />
alternative or augmentative communication strategies or aids.<br />
A Aichert and Ziegler 2008; Brendel and Ziegler 2008; Wambaugh et al 2006a;<br />
Wambaugh et al 2006b; consensus<br />
B Consensus; Wambaugh et al 2006a; Wambaugh et al 2006b<br />
6.21 Swallowing problems: assessment and management<br />
The majority of patients presenting with dysphagia following <strong>stroke</strong> will recover, in part<br />
due to bilateral cortical representation of neurological pathways (Hamdy et al 1998).<br />
However, a proportion will have persistent abnormal swallowing physiology and<br />
continued aspiration at 6 months (Mann et al 1999a). A small proportion of patients<br />
with dysphagia, particularly those with brainstem lesions, will have chronic severe<br />
swallowing difficulties. Patients with persistent swallowing problems may avoid eating in<br />
social settings, and thus lose the physical and social pleasures normally associated with<br />
food.<br />
Aspiration and silent aspiration are common after <strong>stroke</strong>. There is good evidence that the<br />
investigation of dysphagia using instrumental assessments that provide direct imaging <strong>for</strong><br />
evaluation of swallowing physiology, helps to predict outcomes and improve treatment<br />
planning.<br />
Evidence to recommendations<br />
A number of treatments are available <strong>for</strong> the management of dysphagia in acute <strong>stroke</strong>,<br />
and several are controversial. Despite this, there is an expanding body of evidence in<br />
relation to dysphagia therapy programmes and a reduced risk of pneumonia in the acute<br />
stage of <strong>stroke</strong> (Foley et al 2008; Speyer et al 2010). Evidence with respect to alternative<br />
treatment modalities such as transcranial magnetic stimulation, black pepper oil,<br />
nifedipine and biofeedback are showing promising results <strong>for</strong> treatment of those with<br />
chronic dysphagia, although more research is needed (Teasell et al 2011). Other<br />
treatments such as neuromuscular electrical stimulation or acupuncture show equivocal<br />
results. Treatments such as thermal tactile stimulation have no supportive evidence in the<br />
literature (Teasell et al 2011; Foley et al 2008).<br />
6.21.1 Recommendations<br />
A Until a safe swallowing method has been established, all patients with identified<br />
swallowing difficulties should:<br />
● be considered <strong>for</strong> alternative fluids with immediate effect<br />
● have a comprehensive assessment of their swallowing function undertaken by a<br />
specialist in dysphagia<br />
● be considered <strong>for</strong> nasogastric tube feeding within 24 hours<br />
● be referred <strong>for</strong> specialist nutritional assessment, advice and monitoring<br />
100 © Royal College of Physicians 2012