06.03.2013 Views

Artificial Intelligence and Soft Computing: Behavioral ... - Arteimi.info

Artificial Intelligence and Soft Computing: Behavioral ... - Arteimi.info

Artificial Intelligence and Soft Computing: Behavioral ... - Arteimi.info

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

C2 = (C-(C1-{L1})θ1) θ2 -1 ∪ L2. (13.16)<br />

Further, L2 = ¬ L1θ1θ2 -1 . (13.17)<br />

Substituting (13.17) in (13.16) we find<br />

C2 = (C-(C1-{L1})θ1)θ2 -1 ∪ (¬L1θ1θ2 -1 ) (13.18)<br />

The last expression describes an inverse resolution process. It is to be<br />

noted that θ2 -1 st<strong>and</strong>s for inverse substitution, i.e. replacing constants by terms.<br />

As an example, consider the two step inverse resolution shown in fig.<br />

13.14, which ultimately yields a new piece of knowledge:<br />

Gr<strong>and</strong>father (X, Z) ← Mother (Y, Z) ∧ Father (X, Y).<br />

Let us now verify the steps of the computation .<br />

First C1 = Father (janak, sita) =L1 <strong>and</strong><br />

C = Gr<strong>and</strong>father ( janak, lob).<br />

Here, θ1={ } <strong>and</strong> θ2 -1 ={ X / janak }.<br />

So, [C- (C1-{L1}) θ1] θ2 -1<br />

= (Cθ1) θ2 -1<br />

= Gr<strong>and</strong>father (X, lob)<br />

Further, ¬L1θ1 θ2 -1 = ¬Father (X, sita).<br />

Thus the derived clause by (13.18) is Gr<strong>and</strong>father (X, lob) ∨ ¬Father(X, sita).<br />

The second step of inverse resolution can be verified easily in a similar<br />

manner.<br />

13.6 Computational Learning Theory<br />

The main question on machine learning is: how does one know that his<br />

learning algorithm has generated a concept, appropriate for predicting the<br />

future correctly? For instance, in inductive learning how can we assert that our<br />

hypothesis h is sufficiently close to the target function f, when we do not

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!